IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v90y2020ics0264837718318362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness and feasibility of different management practices to reduce soil erosion in an agricultural watershed

Author

Listed:
  • Ricci, G.F.
  • Jeong, J.
  • De Girolamo, A.M.
  • Gentile, F.

Abstract

Erosion is the most widespread form of soil degradation in Europe. EU Member States are called to identify areas prone to high risk of soil erosion and to adopt Best Management Practices (BMPs) to decrease land degradation. This study is aimed at identifying effective BMPs and their economic feasibility for controlling soil erosion in south-central Italy where lands are largely cultivated with winter wheat. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was applied to simulate the baseline hydrologic and soil erosion processes of the Carapelle basin in the Puglia region, Italy. Calibrated sediment loads were reasonably accurate when statistically evaluated against measured data (R2 = 0.5, NSE = 0.5, PBIAS=−2.8 %). The model performed equally well for simulating stream flow rates (R2 = 0.6, NSE = 0.6, PBIAS = 5.3 %). The model maintained reliable performance during the validation period as well. Average annual specific sediment load was estimated 5.95 t ha-1 yr-1 mostly contributed by cultivated croplands. Based on regional agricultural policies, four management scenarios were implemented using the calibrated SWAT model: contour farming (BMP1), no tillage (BMP2); reforestation (BMP3) and contour farming and reforestation (BMP4). A threshold of sediment yield greater than 10 t ha-1yr-1 was selected to discretize target treatment areas where these BMPs were applied. Result show that combining contour farming and reforestation (BMP4) was the most effective (38 % reduction; from 5.95 to 3.70 t ha-1) for erosion control, followed by BMP2 (29 %; from 5.95 to 4.20 t ha-1), BMP1 (22 %; from 5.95 to 4.61 t ha-1) and BMP3 (15 %; from 5.95 to 5.04 t ha-1). An analysis of the farmer return-production cost ratio (FR/PC) indicated that the baseline (conventional tillage) and BMP1 were both economically sustainable in areas with slope <20 % (FR/PC = 1.12 and 1.11, respectively). BMP2 received the highest FR/PC rating of 1.67 in areas with slope <20 %. The baseline scenario had no economic advantage (FR/PC = 0.93) in steep slope areas. BMP3 was ranked at the top (FR/PC = 1.49) followed by BMP2 (FR/PC = 1.41) in areas with slope>20 %. The results show that a program of measures can be effective for controlling soil erosion but it must be implemented over long time frames and it requires relevant investments from the public and private sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricci, G.F. & Jeong, J. & De Girolamo, A.M. & Gentile, F., 2020. "Effectiveness and feasibility of different management practices to reduce soil erosion in an agricultural watershed," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s0264837718318362
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718318362
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prager, Katrin & Schuler, Johannes & Helming, Katharina & Zander, Peter & Ratinger, Tomas & Hagedorn, Konrad, 2011. "An analytical framework for soil degradation, farming practices, institutions and policy responses," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114773, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Pushpa Tuppad & Narayanan Kannan & Raghavan Srinivasan & Colleen Rossi & Jeffrey Arnold, 2010. "Simulation of Agricultural Management Alternatives for Watershed Protection," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(12), pages 3115-3144, September.
    3. Jaehak Jeong & Narayanan Kannan & Jeff Arnold & Roger Glick & Leila Gosselink & Raghavan Srinivasan, 2010. "Development and Integration of Sub-hourly Rainfall–Runoff Modeling Capability Within a Watershed Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(15), pages 4505-4527, December.
    4. De Girolamo, Anna Maria & Barca, Emanuele & Pappagallo, Giuseppe & Lo Porto, Antonio, 2017. "Simulating ecologically relevant hydrological indicators in a temporary river system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PB), pages 194-204.
    5. Ullrich, Antje & Volk, Martin, 2009. "Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to predict the impact of alternative management practices on water quality and quantity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(8), pages 1207-1217, August.
    6. David Pimentel & Michael Burgess, 2013. "Soil Erosion Threatens Food Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Parajuli, P.B. & Mankin, K.R. & Barnes, P.L., 2008. "Applicability of targeting vegetative filter strips to abate fecal bacteria and sediment yield using SWAT," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1189-1200, October.
    8. Liu, Ruimin & Zhang, Peipei & Wang, Xiujuan & Chen, Yaxin & Shen, Zhenyao, 2013. "Assessment of effects of best management practices on agricultural non-point source pollution in Xiangxi River watershed," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 9-18.
    9. Vastola, Antonella & Zdruli, Pandi & D’Amico, Mario & Pappalardo, Gioacchino & Viccaro, Mauro & Di Napoli, Francesco & Cozzi, Mario & Romano, Severino, 2017. "A comparative multidimensional evaluation of conservation agriculture systems: A case study from a Mediterranean area of Southern Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 326-333.
    10. Rattan Lal, 2015. "Restoring Soil Quality to Mitigate Soil Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hadi Nazaripouya & Mehdi Sepehri & Abbas Atapourfard & Bagher Ghermezcheshme & Celso Augusto Guimarães Santos & Mehdi Khoshbakht & Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram & Vikas Kumar Rana & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh & Q, 2023. "Evaluating Sediment Yield Response to Watershed Management Practices (WMP) by Employing the Concept of Sediment Connectivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Wu, Lei & Liu, Xia & Chen, Junlai & Li, Jinfeng & Yu, Yang & Ma, Xiaoyi, 2022. "Efficiency assessment of best management practices in sediment reduction by investigating cost-effective tradeoffs," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    3. Abazar Esmali Ouri & Mohammad Golshan & Saeid Janizadeh & Artemi Cerdà & Assefa M. Melesse, 2020. "Soil Erosion Susceptibility Mapping in Kozetopraghi Catchment, Iran: A Mixed Approach Using Rainfall Simulator and Data Mining Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Tsun-Hua Yang & Wen-Cheng Liu, 2020. "A General Overview of the Risk-Reduction Strategies for Floods and Droughts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Ricci, Giovanni Francesco & D’Ambrosio, Ersilia & De Girolamo, Anna Maria & Gentile, Francesco, 2022. "Efficiency and feasibility of Best Management Practices to reduce nutrient loads in an agricultural river basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Bořivoj Šarapatka & Marek Bednář, 2022. "Rainfall Erosivity Impact on Sustainable Management of Agricultural Land in Changing Climate Conditions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, March.
    7. Nina Noreika & Tailin Li & Julie Winterova & Josef Krasa & Tomas Dostal, 2022. "The Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on the Small Water Cycle: From the Farm- to the Management-Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricci, Giovanni Francesco & D’Ambrosio, Ersilia & De Girolamo, Anna Maria & Gentile, Francesco, 2022. "Efficiency and feasibility of Best Management Practices to reduce nutrient loads in an agricultural river basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Xiukang Wang, 2022. "Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Pignalosa, Antonio & Silvestri, Nicola & Pugliese, Francesco & Corniello, Alfonso & Gerundo, Carlo & Del Seppia, Nicola & Lucchesi, Massimo & Coscini, Nicola & De Paola, Francesco & Giugni, Maurizio, 2022. "Long-term simulations of Nature-Based Solutions effects on runoff and soil losses in a flat agricultural area within the catchment of Lake Massaciuccoli (Central Italy)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Melese Baye Hailu & Surendra Kumar Mishra & Sanjay K. Jain, 2023. "Evaluation of Spatial-Temporal Variation of Soil Loss and Best Conservation Measures in an East Africa Catchment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Hadi Nazaripouya & Mehdi Sepehri & Abbas Atapourfard & Bagher Ghermezcheshme & Celso Augusto Guimarães Santos & Mehdi Khoshbakht & Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram & Vikas Kumar Rana & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh & Q, 2023. "Evaluating Sediment Yield Response to Watershed Management Practices (WMP) by Employing the Concept of Sediment Connectivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Maharjan, Ganga Ram & Ruidisch, Marianne & Shope, Christopher L. & Choi, Kwanghun & Huwe, Bernd & Kim, Seong Joon & Tenhunen, John & Arnhold, Sebastian, 2016. "Assessing the effectiveness of split fertilization and cover crop cultivation in order to conserve soil and water resources and improve crop productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 305-318.
    7. Alcon, Francisco & de-Miguel, María Dolores & Martínez-Paz, José Miguel, 2021. "Assessment of real and perceived cost-effectiveness to inform agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Everton Rocha & Maria Calijuri & Aníbal Santiago & Leonardo Assis & Luna Alves, 2012. "The Contribution of Conservation Practices in Reducing Runoff, Soil Loss, and Transport of Nutrients at the Watershed Level," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(13), pages 3831-3852, October.
    9. Nina Noreika & Tailin Li & Julie Winterova & Josef Krasa & Tomas Dostal, 2022. "The Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on the Small Water Cycle: From the Farm- to the Management-Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Tiziano Gomiero, 2016. "Soil Degradation, Land Scarcity and Food Security: Reviewing a Complex Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-41, March.
    11. Ziauddin Safari & Sayed Tamim Rahimi & Kamal Ahmed & Ahmad Sharafati & Ghaith Falah Ziarh & Shamsuddin Shahid & Tarmizi Ismail & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Eun-Sung Chung & Xiaojun Wang, 2021. "Estimation of Spatial and Seasonal Variability of Soil Erosion in a Cold Arid River Basin in Hindu Kush Mountainous Region Using Remote Sensing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Alberts Auzins & Ieva Leimane & Agnese Krievina & Inga Morozova & Andris Miglavs & Peteris Lakovskis, 2023. "Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Performance of Crop Production in Relation to Crop Rotation, Catch Crops, and Tillage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    13. Puertes, Cristina & Bautista, Inmaculada & Lidón, Antonio & Francés, Félix, 2021. "Best management practices scenario analysis to reduce agricultural nitrogen loads and sediment yield to the semiarid Mar Menor coastal lagoon (Spain)," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Wallace, Carlington W. & Flanagan, Dennis C. & Engel, Bernard A., 2017. "Quantifying the effects of conservation practice implementation on predicted runoff and chemical losses under climate change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 51-65.
    15. Yiannis Panagopoulos & Christos Makropoulos & Maria Mimikou, 2011. "Diffuse Surface Water Pollution: Driving Factors for Different Geoclimatic Regions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(14), pages 3635-3660, November.
    16. Jang, Sun Sook & Ahn, So Ra & Kim, Seong Joon, 2017. "Evaluation of executable best management practices in Haean highland agricultural catchment of South Korea using SWAT," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PB), pages 224-234.
    17. Dipesh Nepal & Prem B. Parajuli, 2022. "Assessment of Best Management Practices on Hydrology and Sediment Yield at Watershed Scale in Mississippi Using SWAT," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Jiang, Jingyuan & Li, Shiyu & Hu, Jiatang & Huang, Jia, 2014. "A modeling approach to evaluating the impacts of policy-induced land management practices on non-point source pollution: A case study of the Liuxi River watershed, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-16.
    19. Ahmad A. Al-Ghamdi & Yilma Tadesse & Nuru Adgaba & Abdulaziz G. Alghamdi, 2021. "Soil Degradation and Restoration in Southwestern Saudi Arabia through Investigation of Soil Physiochemical Characteristics and Nutrient Status as Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Yang, Lin & Pang, Shujiang & Wang, Xiaoyan & Du, Yi & Huang, Jieyu & Melching, Charles S., 2021. "Optimal allocation of best management practices based on receiving water capacity constraints," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s0264837718318362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.