IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v68y2020ics0301420719304167.html

Financial and operational efficiencies of national and international oil companies: An empirical investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Al-Mana, Ali A.
  • Nawaz, Waqas
  • Kamal, Athar
  • Koҫ, Muammer

Abstract

The last two decades have seen a shift in market interest in favor of national oil companies (NOCs) to replace the dominance of international oil companies (IOCs). Since approximately 90% of the oil reserves and 75% of oil production is under the control of NOCs, it is imperative to analyze and understand their performance and efficiency in comparison to the successful business and governance model of IOCs in order to have enhanced forecasts in highly fluctuating market conditions. In the past, some studies attempted to understand the influence of different ownership models, i.e., public or private, but these studies are constrained by their assumptions and limitations. Moreover, the previous studies fail to reach a consensus with regards to the effectiveness of a given ownership model in comparison to the other. The present work is an effort to fill this gap by estimating the operational and financial efficiency differentials of NOCs and IOCs. A comprehensive literature review is carried out as a first step, which helped in identifying the relevant performance measures and the statistical methods that should be employed to obtain conclusive results. Overall, 10 indicators (3 financial and 7 operational) are used in this study to perform four analyses: (i) financial analysis; (ii) operational analysis; (iii) Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA); and (iv) Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The sample consists of 50 firms (composed of 16 NOCs and 34 IOCs), and our temporal interest is in fifteen years (2002–2016). The results suggest that, in general, IOCs perform better than NOCs but the role of privatization on the performance and efficiency of NOCs remains contentious since some NOCs perform as good as the best IOCs. Nevertheless, on average, it is safe to imply that privatization may lead to improved performance and efficiency since shareholder-owned firms, generally, perform better than the national players. For that matter, even some partially privatized firms show evidence of better performance in comparison to NOCs. However, since NOCs are mandated to fulfil the non-commercial objectives of the state as well, in addition to commercial obligations, it would be interesting to establish the comparison between NOCs and IOCs based on commercial and non-commercial performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Al-Mana, Ali A. & Nawaz, Waqas & Kamal, Athar & Koҫ, Muammer, 2020. "Financial and operational efficiencies of national and international oil companies: An empirical investigation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:68:y:2020:i:c:s0301420719304167
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420719304167
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aen:journl:ej34-2-02 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Juliet D'souza & William L. Megginson, 1999. "The Financial and Operating Performance of Privatized Firms during the 1990s," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1397-1438, August.
    3. Stacy Eller & Peter Hartley & Kenneth Medlock, 2011. "Empirical evidence on the operational efficiency of National Oil Companies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 623-643, May.
    4. Christian Wolf & Michael G. Pollitt, 2008. "Privatising national oil companies: Assessing the impact on firm performance," Working Papers EPRG 0805, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    5. Megginson, William L & Nash, Robert C & van Randenborgh, Matthias, 1994. "The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(2), pages 403-452, June.
    6. Hartley, Peter & Medlock III, Kenneth B., 2008. "A model of the operation and development of a National Oil Company," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 2459-2485, September.
    7. repec:aen:journl:ej41-1-gong is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Atris, Amani Mohammed & Goto, Mika, 2019. "Vertical structure and efficiency assessment of the US oil and gas companies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Wolf, Christian, 2009. "Does ownership matter? The performance and efficiency of State Oil vs. Private Oil (1987-2006)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2642-2652, July.
    10. Gong, Binlei, 2018. "Different behaviors in natural gas production between national and private oil companies: Economics-driven or environment-driven?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 145-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sungwook Jung & Jaeho Shin & Changhee Kim, 2025. "A study on the operational and competitive efficiency of National Oil Companies using two-stage network DEA model," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 269-283, March.
    2. Silva Gutiérrez, David & Paz, María J. & Moreno Vite, Atziri, 2021. "Factors that explain the results of the national oil companies: The impact of the fiscal role on Pemex's results," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Ali, Muhammad Kashif & Zahoor, Muhammad Khurram & Saeed, Asif & Nosheen, Safia & Thanakijsombat, Thanarerk, 2023. "Institutional and country level determinants of vertical integration: New evidence from the oil and gas industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Sami Jarboui, 2022. "Operational and environmental efficiency of U.S. oil and gas companies towards energy transition policies: A comparative empirical analysis," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 234-257, June.
    5. Sami Jarboui, 2021. "Renewable energies and operational and environmental efficiencies of the US oil and gas companies: A True Fixed Effect model," Post-Print halshs-04233615, HAL.
    6. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Aliasghar Arabmaldar & John Otu Asu, 2022. "Robust productivity growth and efficiency measurement with undesirable outputs: evidence from the oil industry," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(4), pages 1213-1254, December.
    7. Pei Fun Lee & Weng Siew Lam & Weng Hoe Lam, 2023. "Performance Evaluation of the Efficiency of Logistics Companies with Data Envelopment Analysis Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Sami Jarboui & Hind Alofaysan, 2024. "Global Energy Transition and the Efficiency of the Largest Oil and Gas Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Alex Borodin & Irina Mityushina & Mustafa Harputlu & Natalia Kiseleva & Andrey Kulikov, 2023. "Factor Analysis of the Efficiency of Russian Oil and Gas Companies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 172-188, January.
    10. Hatami-Marbini, A. & Arabmaldar, A. & Otu Asu, J., 2022. "Robust productivity growth and efficiency measurement with undesirable outputs: evidence from the oil industry," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 138964, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:aen:journl:ej34-2-02 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Christian Wolf & Michael G. Pollitt, 2008. "Privatising national oil companies: Assessing the impact on firm performance," Working Papers EPRG 0805, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    3. Cabrales, Sergio & Bautista, Rafael & Benavides, Juan, 2017. "A model to assess the impact of employment policy and subsidized domestic fuel prices on national oil companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 566-578.
    4. Binlei Gong & Robin C. Sickles, 2021. "Resource allocation in multi-divisional multi-product firms," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 47-70, April.
    5. Wolf, Christian, 2009. "Does ownership matter? The performance and efficiency of State Oil vs. Private Oil (1987-2006)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2642-2652, July.
    6. Silvana Tordo & Brandon S. Tracy & Noora Arfaa, 2011. "Natural Oil Companies and Value Creation," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 5922, April.
    7. Christian Wolf & Michael G. Pollitt, 2009. "The Welfare Implications of Oil Privatisation: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Norway's Statoil," Working Papers EPRG 0905, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    8. Wolf, C, 2008. "Does Ownership Matter? The Performance and Efficiency of State Oil vs. Private Oil (1987-2006)," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0828, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    9. Gong, Binlei, 2018. "Different behaviors in natural gas production between national and private oil companies: Economics-driven or environment-driven?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 145-152.
    10. Khanna, Arpita Asha, 2017. "Revisiting the Oil Curse: Does Ownership Matter?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 214-229.
    11. Mohammad Kemal, 2016. "Ownership Rights versus Access Rights Allocation to Critical Resources: An Empirical Study of the Economic Impact of Changes in Oil Governance," Working Papers 2016-02, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    12. Gong, Binlei, 2020. "Multi-dimensional interactions in the oilfield market: A jackknife model averaging approach of spatial productivity analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Sungwook Jung & Jaeho Shin & Changhee Kim, 2025. "A study on the operational and competitive efficiency of National Oil Companies using two-stage network DEA model," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 269-283, March.
    14. Chen, Ruiyuan & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Wang, He, 2017. "Do state and foreign ownership affect investment efficiency? Evidence from privatizations," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 408-421.
    15. van der Ploeg, Frederick & Rohner, Dominic, 2012. "War and natural resource exploitation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 1714-1729.
    16. Mahdavi, Paasha, 2014. "Why do leaders nationalize the oil industry? The politics of resource expropriation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 228-243.
    17. Zhang, Qizheng & Qian, Zesen & Wang, Shuo & Yuan, Lingran & Gong, Binlei, 2022. "Productivity drain or productivity gain? The effect of new technology adoption in the oilfield market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Laura Cabeza García & Silvia Gómez Ansón, 2012. "What Drives the Operating Performance of Privatised Firms?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 59(1), pages 1-27, February.
    19. Wolfgang Aussenegg, 1999. "Going Public in Poland: Case-by-Case Privatizations, Mass Privatization and Private Sector Initial Public Offerings," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 292, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    20. Ben-Nasr, Hamdi, 2016. "Labor protection and government control: Evidence from privatized firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 485-498.
    21. Ben Naceur, Samy & Ghazouani, Samir & Omran, Mohammed, 2007. "The performance of newly privatized firms in selected MENA countries: The role of ownership structure, governance and liberalization policies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 332-353.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:68:y:2020:i:c:s0301420719304167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.