IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v90y2026ics0969698925004692.html

Skincare satisfaction goes green? A comparative textual analysis of vegan and conventional product reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Park, In-Hyoung
  • Suk, Jaehye
  • Kim, Hayoung
  • Kang, Seunghyun
  • Chung, Jae-Eun

Abstract

This study compares post-purchase satisfaction between five categories of vegan and conventional skincare products and examines how product attributes relate to consumer ratings. We analyzed over 110,000 Ulta Beauty reviews using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation modeling technique and hierarchical regression. Eleven key attributes were identified, with intrinsic efficacy and sensory attributes prevailing over extrinsic attributes, while sustainability topics were absent. Drawing on expectation-confirmation theory (ECT) and the zone of tolerance (ZOT) framework, this study yields three main findings. First, vegan products received higher ratings in the pooled sample, moisturizers, and creams—reflecting assimilation effects—but lower ratings in serums, consistent with the ZOT framework, with no differences between mists and oils. Second, sustainability claims generally enhanced ratings for conventional products but not for vegan items, indicating differing expectation thresholds. Finally, a comparative analysis of non-sustainability attributes and rating associations across vegan and conventional cosmetics showed that 53 % of the cases supported the assimilation-contrast effects predicted by ECT, varying with the magnitude of expectation-performance gaps. The findings elucidate comparative post-purchase satisfaction mechanisms grounded in ECT and ZOT and offer practical insights for vegan and conventional skincare marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, In-Hyoung & Suk, Jaehye & Kim, Hayoung & Kang, Seunghyun & Chung, Jae-Eun, 2026. "Skincare satisfaction goes green? A comparative textual analysis of vegan and conventional product reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:90:y:2026:i:c:s0969698925004692
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925004692
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacobi, Liana & Wagner, Helga & Frühwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia, 2016. "Bayesian treatment effects models with variable selection for panel outcomes with an application to earnings effects of maternity leave," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 234-250.
    2. Huyen Ngo-Thi-Ngoc & Bang Nguyen-Viet & Hao Hong-Thach, 2024. "Purchase Intention for Vegan Cosmetics: Applying an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, March.
    3. MacKinnon, James G. & White, Halbert, 1985. "Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 305-325, September.
    4. Chatterjee, Swagato & Goyal, Divesh & Prakash, Atul & Sharma, Jiwan, 2021. "Exploring healthcare/health-product ecommerce satisfaction: A text mining and machine learning application," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 815-825.
    5. Gerrit Antonides & Lies Hovestadt, 2021. "Product Attributes, Evaluability, and Consumer Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Rosillo-Díaz, Elena & Muñoz-Rosas, Juan Francisco & Blanco-Encomienda, Francisco Javier, 2024. "Impact of heuristic–systematic cues on the purchase intention of the electronic commerce consumer through the perception of product quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Cindy G Grappe & Cindy Lombart & Didier Louis & Fabien Durif, 2021. ""Not tested on animals": How consumers react to cruelty-free cosmetics proposed by manufacturers and retailers?," Post-Print hal-03379593, HAL.
    8. Wu, Jia-Jhou & Chang, Sue-Ting, 2020. "Exploring customer sentiment regarding online retail services: A topic-based approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    9. Margaret E. Roberts & Brandon M. Stewart & Dustin Tingley & Christopher Lucas & Jetson Leder‐Luis & Shana Kushner Gadarian & Bethany Albertson & David G. Rand, 2014. "Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 1064-1082, October.
    10. Muhammad Mazhar & Ding Hooi Ting & Amir Zaib Abbasi & Muhammad Aamir Nadeem & Haider Ali Abbasi, 2022. "Gauging customers’ negative disconfirmation in online post-purchase behaviour: The moderating role of service recovery," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2072186-207, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bellary, Sreevatsa & Bala, Pradip Kumar & Chakraborty, Shibashish, 2024. "Exploring cognitive-behavioral drivers impacting consumer continuance intention of fitness apps using a hybrid approach of text mining, SEM, and ANN," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Tyrväinen, Timo, 1991. "Unions, wages and employment: evidence from Finland," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 16/1991, Bank of Finland.
    3. Gu, Chen & Kurov, Alexander & Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2018. "Relief Rallies after FOMC Announcements as a Resolution of Uncertainty," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-18.
    4. Marc Poitras, 2004. "The Impact of Macroeconomic Announcements on Stock Prices: In Search of State Dependence," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 70(3), pages 549-565, January.
    5. Goncalves, Silvia & Kilian, Lutz, 2004. "Bootstrapping autoregressions with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 89-120, November.
    6. Sandra Wankmüller, 2023. "A comparison of approaches for imbalanced classification problems in the context of retrieving relevant documents for an analysis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 91-163, April.
    7. Angrist, Josh & Lavy, Victor, 2002. "The Effect of High School Matriculation Awards: Evidence from Randomized Trials," CEPR Discussion Papers 3827, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    8. Koetter, Michael & Krause, Thomas & Tonzer, Lena, 2019. "Delay determinants of European Banking Union implementation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-20.
    9. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2020. "Sampling‐Based versus Design‐Based Uncertainty in Regression Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 265-296, January.
    10. Cooney, John W. & Moeller, Thomas & Stegemoller, Mike, 2009. "The underpricing of private targets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 51-66, July.
    11. Everett, Jeff & Shiraz Rahaman, Abu & Neu, Dean & Saxton, Gregory, 2024. "Letters to the editor, institutional experimentation, and the public accounting professional," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Minchul Lee & Min Song, 2020. "Incorporating citation impact into analysis of research trends," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1191-1224, August.
    13. Matthias Pelster & Stefan Schaltegger, 2022. "The dark triad and corporate sustainability: An empirical analysis of personality traits of sustainability managers," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 80-99, January.
    14. Gerlinde Mauerer & Eva-Maria Schmidt, 2019. "Parents’ Strategies in Dealing with Constructions of Gendered Responsibilities at Their Workplaces," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    15. R. R. Croes & Y. J. F. M. Krabbe-Alkemade & M. C. Mikkers, 2018. "Competition and quality indicators in the health care sector: empirical evidence from the Dutch hospital sector," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(1), pages 5-19, January.
    16. James G. MacKinnon & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Matthew D. Webb, 2023. "Fast and reliable jackknife and bootstrap methods for cluster‐robust inference," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(5), pages 671-694, August.
    17. Smimou, K. & Abrokwah, M. & Drougas, A., 2025. "Corporate investment decisions and related commodities: International evidence from energy and mining industries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    18. Lichner, Ivan & Lyócsa, Štefan & Výrostová, Eva, 2022. "Nominal and discretionary household income convergence: The effect of a crisis in a small open economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 18-31.
    19. Neil R. Ericsson & James G. MacKinnon, 2002. "Distributions of error correction tests for cointegration," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 5(2), pages 285-318, June.
    20. Bagnara, Matteo & Vaucher, Benoit, 2025. "Risk diversification and extreme risk mitigation," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:90:y:2026:i:c:s0969698925004692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.