IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved Estimation in Measurement Error Models Through Stein Rule Procedure


  • Shalabh


This paper examines the role of Stein estimation in a linear ultrastructural form of the measurement errors model. It is demonstrated that the application of Stein rule estimation to the matrix of true values of regressors leads to the overcoming of the inconsistency of the least squares procedure and yields consistent estimators of regression coefficients. A further application may improve the efficiency properties of the estimators of regression coefficients. It is observed that the proposed family of estimators under some constraint on the characterizing scalar dominates the conventional consistent estimator with respect to the criterion of asymptotic risk under a specific quadratic loss function. Then the problem of prediction of the values of the study variable within the sample is considered, and it is found that the predictors based on the proposed family of estimators are always more efficient than the predictors based on the conventional estimator according to asymptotic predictive mean squared error criterion, although both are biased.

Suggested Citation

  • Shalabh, 1998. "Improved Estimation in Measurement Error Models Through Stein Rule Procedure," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 35-48, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:67:y:1998:i:1:p:35-48

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Srivastava, Anil K. & Shalabh, 1997. "A new property of Stein procedure in measurement error model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 231-234, March.
    2. H. SchneeweiƟ, 1976. "Consistent estimation of a regression with errors in the variables," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 101-115, December.
    3. Moran, P. A. P., 1971. "Estimating structural and functional relationships," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 232-255, June.
    4. Guilkey, David K. & Price, J. Michael, 1981. "On comparing restricted least squares estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 397-404, April.
    5. Van Hoa, Tran, 1986. "Improved estimators in some linear errors-in-variables models in finite samples," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 355-358.
    6. Zheng, Z., 1986. "On estimation of matrix of normal mean," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 70-82, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Shalabh & Garg, Gaurav & Misra, Neeraj, 2009. "Use of prior information in the consistent estimation of regression coefficients in measurement error models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(7), pages 1498-1520, August.
    2. Hayat, Aziz & Bhatti, M. Ishaq, 2013. "Masking of volatility by seasonal adjustment methods," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 676-688.
    3. A. Saleh & B. Kibria, 2013. "Improved ridge regression estimators for the logistic regression model," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2519-2558, December.
    4. Sukhbir Singh & Kanchan Jain & Suresh Sharma, 2014. "Replicated measurement error model under exact linear restrictions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 253-274, May.
    5. Saleh, A.K.Md. Ehsanes & Shalabh,, 2014. "A ridge regression estimation approach to the measurement error model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 68-84.
    6. Cheng, C.-L. & Shalabh, & Garg, G., 2016. "Goodness of fit in restricted measurement error models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 101-116.
    7. Liang, Hua & Song, Weixing, 2009. "Improved estimation in multiple linear regression models with measurement error and general constraint," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(4), pages 726-741, April.
    8. Kim, H.M. & Saleh, A.K.Md.Ehsanes, 2005. "Improved estimation of regression parameters in measurement error models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 273-300, August.
    9. Cheng, C.-L. & Shalabh, & Garg, G., 2014. "Coefficient of determination for multiple measurement error models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 137-152.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:67:y:1998:i:1:p:35-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.