IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeeman/v34y1997i3p187-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conservative versus Mean Risk Assessments: Implications for Superfund Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Viscusi, W. Kip
  • Hamilton, James T.
  • Dockins, P. Christen

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Viscusi, W. Kip & Hamilton, James T. & Dockins, P. Christen, 1997. "Conservative versus Mean Risk Assessments: Implications for Superfund Policies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 187-206, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:34:y:1997:i:3:p:187-206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095-0696(97)91012-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krier, James E, 1990. "Risk and Design," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(2), pages 781-790, June.
    2. Ann M. Roseberry & David E. Burmaster, 1992. "Lognormal Distributions for Water Intake by Children and Adults," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 99-104, March.
    3. Noll, Roger G & Krier, James E, 1990. "Some Implications of Cognitive Psychology for Risk Regulation," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(2), pages 747-779, June.
    4. Roy L. Smith, 1994. "Use of Monte Carlo Simulation for Human Exposure Assessment at a Superfund Site," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 433-439, August.
    5. Brent Finley & Deborah Proctor & Paul Scott & Natalie Harrington & Dennis Paustenbach & Paul Price, 1994. "Recommended Distributions for Exposure Factors Frequently Used in Health Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 533-553, August.
    6. Kenneth T. Bogen, 1994. "A Note on Compounded Conservatism," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 379-381, August.
    7. Alison C. Cullen, 1994. "Measures of Compounding Conservatism in Probabilistic Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 389-393, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Woodward, Richard T., 1998. "Should Agricultural And Resource Economists Care That The Subjective Expected Utility Hypothesis Is False?," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20941, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Sigman, Hilary, 2001. "The Pace of Progress at Superfund Sites: Policy Goals and Interest Group Influence," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(1), pages 315-344, April.
    3. Goeschl, Timo & Heyen, Daniel, 2016. "Precision requirements in pesticide risk assessments: Contrasting value-of-information recommendations with the regulatory practice in the EU," Working Papers 0607, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    4. Forslund, Johanna & Samakovlis, Eva & Vredin Johansson, Maria & Barregård, Lars, 2009. "Does remediation save lives? On the cost of cleaning up arsenic-contaminated sites in Sweden," Working Papers 108, National Institute of Economic Research.
    5. Aven, Terje, 2016. "On the use of conservatism in risk assessments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 33-38.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles N. Haas, 1997. "Importance of Distributional Form in Characterizing Inputs to Monte Carlo Risk Assessments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 107-113, February.
    2. Maged M. Hamed & Philip B. Bedient, 1997. "On the Effect of Probability Distributions of Input Variables in Public Health Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 97-105, February.
    3. Monika Filipsson & Tomas Öberg & Bo Bergbäck, 2011. "Variability and Uncertainty in Swedish Exposure Factors for Use in Quantitative Exposure Assessments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 108-119, January.
    4. Brent Finley & Deborah Proctor & Paul Scott & Natalie Harrington & Dennis Paustenbach & Paul Price, 1994. "Recommended Distributions for Exposure Factors Frequently Used in Health Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 533-553, August.
    5. Simon K Chiu & Louise Freebairn & Louise A Baur & L. Kurt Kreuger & Adam Skinner & Jo‐An Occhipinti, 2023. "Modeling distribution parameters in system dynamics: an application in childhood obesity," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 103-124, April.
    6. Dale Hattis & J Prerna Banati & Rob Goble & David E. Burmaster, 1999. "Human Interindividual Variability in Parameters Related to Health Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 711-726, August.
    7. Jane G. Pouzou & Alison C. Cullen & Michael G. Yost & John C. Kissel & Richard A. Fenske, 2018. "Comparative Probabilistic Assessment of Occupational Pesticide Exposures Based on Regulatory Assessments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(6), pages 1223-1238, June.
    8. Louis Jaeck, 2011. "Information and political failures: to what extent does rational ignorance explain irrational beliefs formation?," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 287-301, September.
    9. Lisa M. Funk & Richard Sedman & Jill A. J. Beals & Robert Fountain, 1998. "Quantifying the Distribution of Inhalation Exposure in Human Populations: 2. Distributions of Time Spent by Adults, Adolescents, and Children at Home, at Work, and at School," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 47-56, February.
    10. Dale Hattis & David E. Burmaster, 1994. "Assessment of Variability and Uncertainty Distributions for Practical Risk Analyses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(5), pages 713-730, October.
    11. Roy L. Smith, 1994. "Use of Monte Carlo Simulation for Human Exposure Assessment at a Superfund Site," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 433-439, August.
    12. Wout Slob, 1994. "Uncertainty Analysis in Multiplicative Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 571-576, August.
    13. Roger G. Noll, 1996. "Reforming Risk Regulation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 545(1), pages 165-175, May.
    14. Qi Zhou, 2009. "Economic analysis of the legal standard for deceit in English tort law," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 83-102, August.
    15. S.Y. Jimmy Chan, 1993. "An Alternative Approach to the Modeling of Probability Distributions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 97-102, February.
    16. Arkadiy Larionov & Ekaterina Nezhnikova & Elena Smirnova, 2021. "Risk Assessment Models to Improve Environmental Safety in the Field of the Economy and Organization of Construction: A Case Study of Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-37, December.
    17. David E. Burmaster, 1998. "Lognormal Distributions for Total Water Intake and Tap Water Intake by Pregnant and Lactating Women in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 215-219, April.
    18. Matthew Kahn, 2007. "Environmental disasters as risk regulation catalysts? The role of Bhopal, Chernobyl, Exxon Valdez, Love Canal, and Three Mile Island in shaping U.S. environmental law," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 17-43, August.
    19. S. N. Rai & D. Krewski, 1998. "Uncertainty and Variability Analysis in Multiplicative Risk Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 37-45, February.
    20. Paul S. Price & Paul K. Scott & Natalie D. Wilson & Dennis J. Paustenbach, 1998. "An Empirical Approach for Deriving Information on Total Duration of Exposure from Information on Historical Exposure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(5), pages 611-619, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:34:y:1997:i:3:p:187-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622870 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.