Hayek, Samuelson, and the logic of the mixed economy?
In 1980 Friedrich Hayek wrote to Paul Samuelson complaining about the role that Economics had played in discrediting the thesis of Hayek's The Road to Serfdom. In the 11th edition of Economics, Samuelson had written that "each step away from the market system and towards the social reform of the welfare state is inevitably a journey that must end in a totalitarian state." Given the apparent prevalence of this reading of Hayek's thesis, we assess the dispute over Hayek's 'inevitability thesis' and whether Hayek's complaints were justified.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- E. Roy Weintraub & Evelyn L. Forget, 2007. "Introduction," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 39(5), pages 1-6, Supplemen.
- anonymous, 1980. "What’s wrong with macroeconomics," Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, issue Sum.
- Bruce Caldwell, 1997. "Hayek and Socialism," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(4), pages 1856-1890, December.
- Rosser, J. Jr., 2005. "The Road to Serfdom and the world economy: 60 years later," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 1012-1025, December.
- Boettke, Peter J., 2005. "On reading Hayek: Choice, consequences and The Road to Serfdom," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 1042-1053, December.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:69:y:2009:i:1:p:5-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.