IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeborg/v237y2025ics0167268125002550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do religious people cope better in a crisis? Evidence from the UK pandemic lockdowns

Author

Listed:
  • Iyer, Sriya
  • Larcom, Shaun
  • Shah, Jaimin
  • She, Po-Wen

Abstract

We measure whether religious people in the UK coped better during the nationwide pandemic lockdowns using the Understanding Society longitudinal dataset. Using religious belonging and religious intensity, both measured before the pandemic, we find that those who belonged to a religion, and those who stated that religion made a difference to their life, coped better during the pandemic. The magnitude of the difference is sizeable. For the Caseness aggregate measure of psychological distress, the coefficient on religious belonging is around one fifth of the lockdown coefficient. We also estimate the aggregate relationship between religious intensity and coping among those who belong to a religion. Here we find no evidence that intensity of faith is related to better coping. However, we do find some heterogeneity among religions, where intensity is associated with better coping among Christians, while among Muslims we find the opposite relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Iyer, Sriya & Larcom, Shaun & Shah, Jaimin & She, Po-Wen, 2025. "Do religious people cope better in a crisis? Evidence from the UK pandemic lockdowns," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:237:y:2025:i:c:s0167268125002550
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125002550
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:237:y:2025:i:c:s0167268125002550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jebo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.