IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v101y2025ics0047235225001722.html

Sellin and Wolfgang revisited: A partial replication and expansion considering cybercrime

Author

Listed:
  • Engle, Timothy A.
  • Maher, Cooper A.
  • Nedelec, Joseph L.

Abstract

Perceptions of the seriousness of crime play a significant role in how stakeholders and victims respond to crime. Seminal work in this area was provided by Sellin and Wolfgang (1964) who sampled judges, police officers, and college students to assess perceptions of seriousness for a variety of crimes. Since that time, however, crime has evolved. While prior research has expanded Sellin and Wolfgang's work, previous examinations have not considered the emergence of cybercrime. The current study partially replicated and expanded upon Sellin and Wolfgang's analysis using a large online opt-in survey sample (n = 479). Respondents rated their perceptions of crime seriousness across a range of both terrestrial and cyber-based crime. The results generally replicated the findings of Sellin and Wolfgang and other previous works, with physically consequential crimes rated most serious relative to theft and nonviolent crimes. Additionally, certain cybercrime types were perceived as highly serious, relative to both online and terrestrial crimes. Multivariable regression analyses illustrated that a variety of correlates, including perceived victimization risk and some demographic characteristics, were associated with crime seriousness rankings. The findings are discussed in light of previous research and limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Engle, Timothy A. & Maher, Cooper A. & Nedelec, Joseph L., 2025. "Sellin and Wolfgang revisited: A partial replication and expansion considering cybercrime," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001722
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001722
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stylianou, Stelios, 2003. "Measuring crime seriousness perceptions: What have we learned and what else do we want to know," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 37-56.
    2. Page, Benjamin I. & Shapiro, Robert Y., 1983. "Effects of Public Opinion on Policy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(1), pages 175-190, March.
    3. Andrew J. Thompson & Justin T. Pickett, 2020. "Are Relational Inferences from Crowdsourced and Opt-in Samples Generalizable? Comparing Criminal Justice Attitudes in the GSS and Five Online Samples," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 907-932, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McNealey, Rachel L. & Figueroa, Camille I. & Maher, Cooper A., 2025. "“Police can't help you”: Exploring influences on perceptions of policing cybercrime," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McNealey, Rachel L. & Figueroa, Camille I. & Maher, Cooper A., 2025. "“Police can't help you”: Exploring influences on perceptions of policing cybercrime," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Cornelius Wright Cappelen & Hakan G. Sicakkan & Pierre Georges Van Wolleghem, 2023. "The trade-off between admitting and paying: Experimental evidence on attitudes towards asylum responsibility-sharing," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(3), pages 470-493, September.
    3. Lamberova, Natalia, 2021. "The puzzling politics of R&D: Signaling competence through risky projects," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 801-818.
    4. Eugene C.X. Ikejemba & Peter C. Schuur, 2018. "Analyzing the Impact of Theft and Vandalism in Relation to the Sustainability of Renewable Energy Development Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Niklas Harring & Sverker C. Jagers, 2013. "Should We Trust in Values? Explaining Public Support for Pro-Environmental Taxes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Christopher J Williams, 2016. "Issuing reasoned opinions: The effect of public attitudes towards the European Union on the usage of the 'Early Warning System'," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(3), pages 504-521, September.
    7. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Schumacher, Kira & Fichtner, Wolf, 2021. "Topic Modeling Uncovers Shifts in Media Framing of the German Renewable Energy Act," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2(1).
    8. Douhou, Salima & Magnus, Jan R. & van Soest, Arthur, 2011. "The perception of small crime," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 749-763.
    9. Xiao Tang & Weiwei Chen & Tian Wu, 2018. "Do Authoritarian Governments Respond to Public Opinion on the Environment? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Flory, Christopher M. & May, David C. & Minor, Kevin I. & Wood, Peter B., 2006. "A comparison of punishment exchange rates between offenders under supervision and their supervising officers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 39-50.
    11. An, Youngeun & Lee, Youngsun & Oh, Soon-young & Lee, Jeong Youn, 2024. "How can young adults be civically engaged? The role of academic achievement standards in enhancing civic and social engagement in the case of South Korea," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    12. Mitchell B. Chamlin & Andrew J. Myer, 2009. "Disentangling the Crime-arrest Relationship: The Influence of Social Context," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 371-389, December.
    13. Jensen, Carsten & Naumann, Elias, 2016. "Increasing pressures and support for public healthcare in Europe," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(6), pages 698-705.
    14. Anirudh Burman & Bhargavi Zaveri, 2016. "Regulatory responsiveness in India: A normative and empirical framework for assessment," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2016-025, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    15. Donald L. Jordan & Benjamin I. Page, 1992. "Shaping Foreign Policy Opinions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(2), pages 227-241, June.
    16. Benjamin Michallet & Giuseppe Lucio Gaeta & François Facchini, 2015. "Greening Up or Not? The Determinants Political Parties’ Environmental Concern: An Empirical Analysis Based on European Data (1970-2008)," Working Papers 2015.25, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    17. Liza G. Steele, 2015. "Income Inequality, Equal Opportunity, and Attitudes About Redistribution," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(2), pages 444-464, June.
    18. Qiu, Y.Q. & Tsan Sheng Ng, Adam & Zhou, P., 2022. "Optimizing urban electric vehicle incentive policy mixes in China: Perspective of residential preference heterogeneity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    19. Najam uz Zehra Gardezi & Brent S. Steel & Angela Lavado, 2020. "The Impact of Efficacy, Values, and Knowledge on Public Preferences Concerning Food–Water–Energy Policy Tradeoffs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
    20. James W. Stoutenborough & Arnold Vedlitz & Xinsheng Liu, 2015. "The Influence of Specific Risk Perceptions on Public Policy Support," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 658(1), pages 102-120, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.