IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jaitra/v99y2022ics0969699721001599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A three-level framework to evaluate airline service quality based on interval valued neutrosophic AHP considering the new dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Yalcin Kavus, Bahar
  • Gulum Tas, Pelin
  • Ayyildiz, Ertugrul
  • Taskin, Alev

Abstract

Measuring customer satisfaction in service businesses is very important in terms of both increasing service quality and meeting customer expectations. Up-to-date and comprehensive quality of service measurement techniques provide important information to the companies about the way customers perceive the quality and their service quality expectations. It is critical to measure the service quality for airline transportation, which is becoming more popular compared to other types of transportation and therefore increasing competition. In order to compete in the market and improve their service quality, companies should know their customers well and make improvements by analysing their expectations correctly. In this context, the SERVQUAL method is one of the frequently preferred and effective tools in service quality measurement. However, it is not possible to deal with the effects of radical changes such as the development and transformations of technology, events and trends under the influence of the world with the conventional SERVQUAL method. For this purpose, the traditional method consisting of five dimensions has been extended to nine dimensions by adding four more dimensions, namely Environment, Pandemic, Digital Technology and Information Systems. While it is possible to perform a more detailed service quality measurement with the proposed method, companies are provided with an effective and up-to-date tool to determine which dimensions are more important. In this study after structuring main dimensions and its inner levels hierarchically, Modified Delphi method is applied to a group of experts and the main criteria are evaluated with Best Worst Method and sub-criteria are evaluated with Interval-Valued Neutrosophic AHP method. After subjecting the criteria, whose importance are determined, to sensitivity analysis, the results obtained are evaluated in terms of airline transportation and recommendations are presented. In addition to the extended approach it proposes, this study is the most detailed research on airline service quality as far as we know.

Suggested Citation

  • Yalcin Kavus, Bahar & Gulum Tas, Pelin & Ayyildiz, Ertugrul & Taskin, Alev, 2022. "A three-level framework to evaluate airline service quality based on interval valued neutrosophic AHP considering the new dimensions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:99:y:2022:i:c:s0969699721001599
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699721001599
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pakdil, Fatma & Aydın, Özlem, 2007. "Expectations and perceptions in airline services: An analysis using weighted SERVQUAL scores," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 229-237.
    2. Li, Wenhua & Yu, Suihuai & Pei, Huining & Zhao, Chuan & Tian, Baozhen, 2017. "A hybrid approach based on fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic method for evaluation in-flight service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 49-64.
    3. Mattila, Juri & Seppälä, Timo, 2016. "Digital Trust, Platforms, and Policy," ETLA Brief 42, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    4. Dong-Shang Chang & Sheng-Hung Chen & Chia-Wei Hsu & Allen H. Hu, 2015. "Identifying Strategic Factors of the Implantation CSR in the Airline Industry: The Case of Asia-Pacific Airlines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Yeh, Chung-Hsing & Kuo, Yu-Liang, 2003. "Evaluating passenger services of Asia-Pacific international airports," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 35-48, January.
    6. Jiang, Hongwei & Zhang, Yahua, 2016. "An investigation of service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty in China's airline market," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 80-88.
    7. Shpëtim Çerri, 2012. "Assessing The Quality Of Higher Education Services Using A Modified Servqual Scale," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(14), pages 1-32.
    8. Park, Jin-Woo & Robertson, Rodger & Wu, Cheng-Lung, 2004. "The effect of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioural intentions: a Korean case study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 435-439.
    9. Rico Merkert & James Pearson, 2015. "A Non-parametric Efficiency Measure Incorporating Perceived Airline Service Levels and Profitability," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 49(2), pages 261-275, April.
    10. Omrani, Hashem & Alizadeh, Arash & Amini, Mohaddeseh, 2020. "A new approach based on BWM and MULTIMOORA methods for calculating semi-human development index: An application for provinces of Iran," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Chen, Fang-Yuan & Chang, Yu-Hern, 2005. "Examining airline service quality from a process perspective," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 79-87.
    12. Choi, Jong Hae, 2021. "Changes in airport operating procedures and implications for airport strategies post-COVID-19," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Ming-Chih Tsai & Rico Merkert & Jiana-Fu Wang, 0. "What drives freight transportation customer loyalty? Diverging marketing approaches for the air freight express industry," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    14. Hussain, Rahim & Al Nasser, Amjad & Hussain, Yomna K., 2015. "Service quality and customer satisfaction of a UAE-based airline: An empirical investigation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 167-175.
    15. Basfirinci, Cigdem & Mitra, Amitava, 2015. "A cross cultural investigation of airlines service quality through integration of Servqual and the Kano model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 239-248.
    16. Liou, James J.H. & Tsai, Chieh-Yuan & Lin, Rong-Ho & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2011. "A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 57-61.
    17. Kheybari, Siamak & Kazemi, Mostafa & Rezaei, Jafar, 2019. "Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 612-623.
    18. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Havle, Celal Alpay & Feyzioğlu, Orhan, 2020. "A new digital service quality model and its strategic analysis in aviation industry using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    19. Ming-Chih Tsai & Rico Merkert & Jiana-Fu Wang, 2021. "What drives freight transportation customer loyalty? Diverging marketing approaches for the air freight express industry," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1503-1521, June.
    20. Suzana Markovic & Sanja Raspor, 2010. "Measuring Perceived Service Quality Using SERVQUAL: A Case Study of the Croatian Hotel Industry," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 5(3), pages 195-209.
    21. Mengyuan Sun & Yong Tian & Yao Zhang & Muhammad Nadeem & Can Xu, 2021. "Environmental Impact and External Costs Associated with Hub-and-Spoke Network in Air Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    22. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    23. Sarbast Moslem & Tiziana Campisi & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz & Szabolcs Duleba & Kh Md Nahiduzzaman & Giovanni Tesoriere, 2020. "Best–Worst Method for Modelling Mobility Choice after COVID-19: Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sahin, Aleyna & Imamoglu, Gul & Murat, Mirac & Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2024. "A holistic decision-making approach to assessing service quality in higher education institutions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Dehnavi, Morteza Narimani & Yazdian, Seyed Ahmad & Sadjadi, Seyed Jafar, 2023. "Evaluating effective criteria on customer satisfaction using the best-worst method and optimizing resource allocation, case study Iran aseman airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bellizzi, Maria Grazia & dell’Olio, Luigi & Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2021. "Detecting passengers' heterogeneity on airlines’ services using SP data," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Gupta, Himanshu, 2018. "Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 35-47.
    3. Maria Grazia Bellizzi & Luigi dell’Olio & Laura Eboli & Carmen Forciniti & Gabriella Mazzulla, 2020. "Passengers’ Expectations on Airlines’ Services: Design of a Stated Preference Survey and Preliminary Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Li, Wenhua & Yu, Suihuai & Pei, Huining & Zhao, Chuan & Tian, Baozhen, 2017. "A hybrid approach based on fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic method for evaluation in-flight service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 49-64.
    5. Shah, Faisal Tehseen & Syed, Zaineb & Imam, Abeer & Raza, Aiman, 2020. "The impact of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioral intentions using passenger satisfaction as a mediator," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Tsafarakis, Stelios & Kokotas, Theodosios & Pantouvakis, Angelos, 2018. "A multiple criteria approach for airline passenger satisfaction measurement and service quality improvement," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 61-75.
    7. Tahanisaz, Sahar & shokuhyar, Sajjad, 2020. "Evaluation of passenger satisfaction with service quality: A consecutive method applied to the airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Samanci, Simge & Didem Atalay, Kumru & Bahar Isin, Feride, 2021. "Focusing on the big picture while observing the concerns of both managers and passengers in the post-covid era," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Kazim Sari & Abdullah Alper Sener, 2022. "Service quality and intention to recommend in low-cost and full-service airlines in Turkey," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(3), pages 297-309, September.
    10. Chandra Mahapatra, Subas & Bellamkonda, Raja Shekhar, 2023. "Higher expectations of passengers do really sense: Development and validation a multiple scale-FliQual for air transport service quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Ko, Young Dae & Kwag, Sung Il & Oh, Yonghui, 2020. "An efficient airline seat reallocation algorithm considering customer dissatisfaction," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. Juan de Oña & Rocio de Oña, 2015. "Quality of Service in Public Transport Based on Customer Satisfaction Surveys: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Approaches," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 605-622, August.
    13. Deveci, Muhammet & Özcan, Ender & John, Robert & Öner, Sultan Ceren, 2018. "Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy set method for improving the service quality of domestic airlines in Turkey," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 83-98.
    14. Eunil Park & Sanghoon Lee & Sang Jib Kwon & Angel P. Del Pobil, 2015. "Determinants of Behavioral Intention to Use South Korean Airline Services: Effects of Service Quality and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Kurtulmuşoğlu, Feride Bahar & Can, Gülin Feryal & Tolon, Metehan, 2016. "A voice in the skies: Listening to airline passenger preferences," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 130-137.
    16. Patricia Lippitt & Nadine Itani & John F. O’Connell & David Warnock-Smith & Marina Efthymiou, 2023. "Investigating Airline Service Quality from a Business Traveller Perspective through the Integration of the Kano Model and Importance–Satisfaction Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Basfirinci, Cigdem & Mitra, Amitava, 2015. "A cross cultural investigation of airlines service quality through integration of Servqual and the Kano model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 239-248.
    18. Atalay, Kumru Didem & Atalay, Buket & Isin, Feride Bahar, 2019. "FIPIA with information entropy: A new hybrid method to assess airline service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 67-77.
    19. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi & Amiri, Maghsoud & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Turskis, Zenonas & Antucheviciene, Jurgita, 2017. "A new hybrid simulation-based assignment approach for evaluating airlines with multiple service quality criteria," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 45-60.
    20. Kattreeya Chanpariyavatevong & Warit Wipulanusat & Thanapong Champahom & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Dissakoon Chonsalasin & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2021. "Predicting Airline Customer Loyalty by Integrating Structural Equation Modeling and Bayesian Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:99:y:2022:i:c:s0969699721001599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-air-transport-management/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.