IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jaitra/v70y2018icp73-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does gender matter? Considering gender of service in the airline industry

Author

Listed:
  • KurtulmuÅŸoÄŸlu, Feride Bahar
  • Can, Gülin Feryal
  • Pakdil, Fatma
  • Tolon, Metehan

Abstract

Airline firms prioritize service features on the basis of customers' demand. While prioritizing these service features, successful positioning strategies are expected to focus on gender specific concerns. Given the fact that previous literature relies heavily on gender neutral strategies in airline industry, this study particularly addresses critical service features prioritized by female and male passengers by ranking airlines based on a multi-criteria decision-making method. Comfortable chair, seat space and leg room, and flexibility in reservation change were discovered as the three most impactful service features for female passengers. Availability of non-stop flight, frequency of flights, and airfare appeared as the other three most impactful service features among male passengers.

Suggested Citation

  • KurtulmuÅŸoÄŸlu, Feride Bahar & Can, Gülin Feryal & Pakdil, Fatma & Tolon, Metehan, 2018. "Does gender matter? Considering gender of service in the airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 73-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:70:y:2018:i:c:p:73-82
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.04.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699717304994
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.04.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milioti, Christina P. & Karlaftis, Matthew G. & Akkogiounoglou, Eleni, 2015. "Traveler perceptions and airline choice: A multivariate probit approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 46-52.
    2. Forgas, Santiago & Moliner, Miguel A. & Sánchez, Javier & Palau, Ramon, 2010. "Antecedents of airline passenger loyalty: Low-cost versus traditional airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 229-233.
    3. Li, Wenhua & Yu, Suihuai & Pei, Huining & Zhao, Chuan & Tian, Baozhen, 2017. "A hybrid approach based on fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic method for evaluation in-flight service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 49-64.
    4. Aksoy, Safak & Atilgan, Eda & Akinci, Serkan, 2003. "Airline services marketing by domestic and foreign firms: differences from the customers’ viewpoint," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 343-351.
    5. Chen, Hsi-Tien & Chao, Ching-Cheng, 2015. "Airline choice by passengers from Taiwan and China: A case study of outgoing passengers from Kaohsiung International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 53-63.
    6. Park, Jin-Woo, 2007. "Passenger perceptions of service quality: Korean and Australian case studies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 238-242.
    7. O’Connell, John F. & Williams, George, 2005. "Passengers’ perceptions of low cost airlines and full service carriers: A case study involving Ryanair, Aer Lingus, Air Asia and Malaysia Airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 259-272.
    8. Chen, Fang-Yuan & Chang, Yu-Hern, 2005. "Examining airline service quality from a process perspective," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 79-87.
    9. Vlachos, Ilias & Lin, Zhibin, 2014. "Drivers of airline loyalty: Evidence from the business travelers in China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-17.
    10. Liou, James J.H. & Tsai, Chieh-Yuan & Lin, Rong-Ho & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2011. "A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 57-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeon, Mi-Sun & Lee, Jang-Ho, 2020. "Estimation of willingness-to-pay for premium economy class by type of service," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Farzadnia, Siavash & Raeesi Vanani, Iman, 2022. "Identification of opinion trends using sentiment analysis of airlines passengers' reviews," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Rubio-Andrada, Luis & Celemín-Pedroche, María Soledad & Escat-Cortés, María-Dolores & Jiménez-Crisóstomo, Abel, 2023. "Passengers satisfaction with the technologies used in smart airports: An empirical study from a gender perspective," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Ragbir, Nadine K. & Rice, Stephen & Winter, Scott R. & Baugh, Bradley S. & Milner, Mattie N. & Gupta, Madhur Bharat & Valecha, Drishti O. & Candelaria-Oquendo, Karla & Capps, John & Neal, Jan G., 2021. "An examination of consumer bias against female and minority commercial pilots," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samanci, Simge & Didem Atalay, Kumru & Bahar Isin, Feride, 2021. "Focusing on the big picture while observing the concerns of both managers and passengers in the post-covid era," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Maria Grazia Bellizzi & Luigi dell’Olio & Laura Eboli & Carmen Forciniti & Gabriella Mazzulla, 2020. "Passengers’ Expectations on Airlines’ Services: Design of a Stated Preference Survey and Preliminary Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Sezgen, Eren & Mason, Keith J. & Mayer, Robert, 2019. "Voice of airline passenger: A text mining approach to understand customer satisfaction," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 65-74.
    4. Bellizzi, Maria Grazia & dell’Olio, Luigi & Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2021. "Detecting passengers' heterogeneity on airlines’ services using SP data," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Juan de Oña & Rocio de Oña, 2015. "Quality of Service in Public Transport Based on Customer Satisfaction Surveys: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Approaches," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 605-622, August.
    6. Özlem Atalık & Mahmut Bakır & Şahap Akan, 2019. "The Role of In-Flight Service Quality on Value for Money in Business Class: A Logit Model on the Airline Industry," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Kurtulmuşoğlu, Feride Bahar & Can, Gülin Feryal & Tolon, Metehan, 2016. "A voice in the skies: Listening to airline passenger preferences," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 130-137.
    8. Medina-Muñoz, Diego Ramón & Medina-Muñoz, Rita Dolores & Suárez-Cabrera, Miguel à ngel, 2018. "Determining important attributes for assessing the attractiveness of airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 45-56.
    9. Atalay, Kumru Didem & Atalay, Buket & Isin, Feride Bahar, 2019. "FIPIA with information entropy: A new hybrid method to assess airline service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 67-77.
    10. Henderson, Isaac Levi & Tsui, Kan Wai Hong & Ngo, Thanh & Gilbey, Andrew & Avis, Mark, 2019. "Airline brand choice in a duopolistic market: The case of New Zealand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 147-163.
    11. Gupta, Himanshu, 2018. "Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 35-47.
    12. Perçin, Selçuk, 2018. "Evaluating airline service quality using a combined fuzzy decision-making approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 48-60.
    13. Yalcin Kavus, Bahar & Gulum Tas, Pelin & Ayyildiz, Ertugrul & Taskin, Alev, 2022. "A three-level framework to evaluate airline service quality based on interval valued neutrosophic AHP considering the new dimensions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Chen, I-Shuo, 2016. "A combined MCDM model based on DEMATEL and ANP for the selection of airline service quality improvement criteria: A study based on the Taiwanese airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 7-18.
    15. Kuljanin, Jovana & Paskota, Mira & Kalić, Milica, 2018. "Methodological framework for the investigation on the rapidly growing air travel market – An application of multivariate statistical analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 86-91.
    16. Truong, Dothang & Pan, Jing Yu & Buaphiban, Thapanat, 2020. "Low cost carriers in Southeast Asia: How does ticket price change the way passengers make their airline selection?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    17. Hunt, Jennifer & Truong, Dothang, 2019. "Low-fare flights across the Atlantic: Impact of low-cost, long-haul trans-Atlantic flights on passenger choice of Carrier," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 170-184.
    18. Patricia Lippitt & Nadine Itani & John F. O’Connell & David Warnock-Smith & Marina Efthymiou, 2023. "Investigating Airline Service Quality from a Business Traveller Perspective through the Integration of the Kano Model and Importance–Satisfaction Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Shah, Faisal Tehseen & Syed, Zaineb & Imam, Abeer & Raza, Aiman, 2020. "The impact of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioral intentions using passenger satisfaction as a mediator," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Farooq, Muhammad Shoaib & Salam, Maimoona & Fayolle, Alain & Jaafar, Norizan & Ayupp, Kartinah, 2018. "Impact of service quality on customer satisfaction in Malaysia airlines: A PLS-SEM approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 169-180.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:70:y:2018:i:c:p:73-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-air-transport-management/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.