IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intfor/v41y2025i2p702-715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partisan bias, attribute substitution, and the benefits of an indirect format for eliciting forecasts and judgments of trend

Author

Listed:
  • Comerford, David A.
  • Soll, Jack B.

Abstract

A majority of Americans reported the economy to be worsening when objective indicators showed it to be recovering. We show that this is symptomatic of attribute substitution—people answer a taxing question as though asked a related easy-to-answer question. An implication of attribute substitution is that forecasts will vary across a direct format, which asks whether the economy will be better in 12 months, versus an indirect format, which asks respondents to rate both current conditions and the conditions they expect for 12 months’ time. We compare these formats in three studies and over 2,000 respondents. Relative to the direct format, the indirect format delivers trends that show greater consensus across Republicans and Democrats; are less equivocal about the course of the US economy; and are more realistic about the magnitude of change in opinion poll data.

Suggested Citation

  • Comerford, David A. & Soll, Jack B., 2025. "Partisan bias, attribute substitution, and the benefits of an indirect format for eliciting forecasts and judgments of trend," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 702-715.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:41:y:2025:i:2:p:702-715
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.11.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207024001092
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.11.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:41:y:2025:i:2:p:702-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijforecast .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.