IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v94y2022ics0160289622000642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Latin square tasks: A multi-study evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Hartung, Johanna
  • Goecke, Benjamin
  • Schroeders, Ulrich
  • Schmitz, Florian
  • Wilhelm, Oliver

Abstract

The Latin Square Task (LST) was proposed as a theoretically well-grounded paradigm for measuring fluid intelligence. In four studies (total N = 3,439) we systematically investigated the psychometric properties of LSTs. Results provided evidence that (a) the construct is unidimensional, (b) the administered stimulus types and the rotation of the item matrix only played a minor role, and (c) the relations with other measures of reasoning ability were in the expected range (about r = .50), confirming the validity of LSTs. For unsupervised automated test construction, item difficulty was only insufficiently accounted for by relational complexity and the number of steps that need to be memorized for solving an item. We discuss possible remedies for improving the paradigm including its generalizability. Furthermore, we propose that the binding-hypothesis of working memory is theoretically suited to account for item difficulties in LSTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartung, Johanna & Goecke, Benjamin & Schroeders, Ulrich & Schmitz, Florian & Wilhelm, Oliver, 2022. "Latin square tasks: A multi-study evaluation," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0160289622000642
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2022.101683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289622000642
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2022.101683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goecke, B. & Weiss, S. & Steger, D. & Schroeders, U. & Wilhelm, O., 2020. "Testing competing claims about overclaiming," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Klaas Sijtsma, 2009. "On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 107-120, March.
    3. L. Thurstone, 1937. "Ability, motivation, and speed," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 2(4), pages 249-254, December.
    4. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    5. Hao Wu & Ryne Estabrook, 2016. "Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1014-1045, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Ziqin Liang & Elisa Delvecchio & Adriana Lis & Claudia Mazzeschi, 2023. "Italian Validation of the Delaying Gratification Inventory in Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Carlos Miguel Lemos & Ross Joseph Gore & Ivan Puga-Gonzalez & F LeRon Shults, 2019. "Dimensionality and factorial invariance of religiosity among Christians and the religiously unaffiliated: A cross-cultural analysis based on the International Social Survey Programme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-36, May.
    4. Attanasio, Orazio & Blundell, Richard & Conti, Gabriella & Mason, Giacomo, 2020. "Inequality in socio-emotional skills: A cross-cohort comparison," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Mercy Gloria Ashepet & Liesbet Vranken & Caroline Michellier & Olivier Dewitte & Rodgers Mutyebere & Clovis Kabaseke & Ronald Twongyirwe & Violet Kanyiginya & Grace Kagoro-Rugunda & Tine Huyse & Liesb, 2024. "Assessing scale reliability in citizen science motivational research: lessons learned from two case studies in Uganda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Érika Martins Silva Ramos & Cecilia Jakobsson Bergstad, 2021. "The Psychology of Sharing: Multigroup Analysis among Users and Non-Users of Carsharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Dandara Gabriela Haag & Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago & Davi Manzini Macedo & João Luiz Bastos & Yin Paradies & Lisa Jamieson, 2020. "Development and initial psychometric assessment of the race-related attitudes and multiculturalism scale in Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Hernán Bejarano & Pedro Hancevic & Yadira Peralta, 2024. "Pro-Environmental Values and Energy Practices in Mexican Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Insights from the New Ecological Paradigm," Working Papers DTE 636, CIDE, División de Economía.
    9. Pietschnig, Jakob & Deimann, Pia & Hirschmann, Nicole & Kastner-Koller, Ursula, 2021. "The Flynn effect in Germanophone preschoolers (1996–2018): Small effects, erratic directions, and questionable interpretations," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Gregor Sočan & Gaja Zager Kocjan, 2022. "Person-level assessment of measurement invariance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3481-3503, October.
    11. Veljko Jovanović & Maksim Rudnev & Naved Iqbal & Sean P. M. Rice & Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska, 2022. "Cross-Cultural Measurement of Positive and Negative Emotions in Adolescence: Evidence from Three Countries," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 3143-3160, October.
    12. Lena Busch & Till Utesch & Bernd Strauss, 2019. "Validation of the vignette-based German Exercise Causality Orientation Scale (G-ECOS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Tormod Bøe & Mari Hysing & Jens Christoffer Skogen & Kyrre Breivik, 2016. "The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Factor Structure and Gender Equivalence in Norwegian Adolescents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Tomas Lazdauskas & Sean C. McDevitt, 2023. "The Chess–Thomas Adult Temperament Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties of the Lithuanian Version," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, January.
    15. Lazaridis, Alexandros & Vetter, Marco & Pietschnig, Jakob, 2022. "Domain-specificity of Flynn effects in the CHC-model: Stratum II test score changes in Germanophone samples (1996–2018)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Pascal Jordan & Meike C Shedden-Mora & Bernd Löwe, 2017. "Psychometric analysis of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) in primary care using modern item response theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Ulrich Schroeders & Oliver Wilhelm & Gabriel Olaru, 2016. "Meta-Heuristics in Short Scale Construction: Ant Colony Optimization and Genetic Algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Nathaniel Oliver Iotti & Damiano Menin & Tomas Jungert, 2022. "Early Adolescents’ Motivations to Defend Victims of Cyberbullying," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-9, July.
    20. Christoph Dworschak, 2024. "Bias mitigation in empirical peace and conflict studies: A short primer on posttreatment variables," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(3), pages 462-476, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0160289622000642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.