IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v114y2026ics0160289625000893.html

Exploring exceptional minds: Political orientations of gifted adults

Author

Listed:
  • Krolo, Maximilian
  • Sparfeldt, Jörn R.
  • Rost, Detlef H.

Abstract

Gifted individuals are influential in shaping the success of societies in areas such as economics, science, and politics. However, prior research on the relationship between intelligence and political orientations yielded inconsistent results. The political orientations of gifted adults remain yet underexplored. Therefore, we examined the political orientations of gifted and non-gifted adults using both, a single-dimensional left-right self-placement and a multi-dimensional questionnaire. From 7023 non-preselected third graders, gifted students (IQ ≥ 130) and a matched sample of non-gifted students (IQ ≈ 100) were initially identified and re-identified in ninth grade following another intelligence testing within the scope of the Marburg Giftedness Project. About 35 years after the initial identification, 87 gifted and 71 non-gifted adults participated in our follow-up survey. In a 2 × 2 ANOVA with the independent variables giftedness and the control variable sex, no significant effects were found in the left-right self-placement. In a 2 × 2 MANOVA and subsequent ANOVAs with the four scales of the multi-dimensional questionnaire (economic libertarianism, liberalism, conservatism, socialism), no significant main or interaction effect emerged, except a significant interaction effect of giftedness and sex for conservatism. Specifically, non-gifted men showed higher conservatism scores than gifted men, whereas gifted and non-gifted women did not differ significantly. The results from supplementary Bayesian analyses were in accordance with these interpretations. The relevance of these findings is discussed, underscoring the nuanced relationship between giftedness and political orientations.

Suggested Citation

  • Krolo, Maximilian & Sparfeldt, Jörn R. & Rost, Detlef H., 2026. "Exploring exceptional minds: Political orientations of gifted adults," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:114:y:2026:i:c:s0160289625000893
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2025.101986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289625000893
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2025.101986?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johanna Mollerstrom & David Seim, 2014. "Cognitive Ability and the Demand for Redistribution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-7, October.
    2. Lin, Chien-An & Bates, Timothy C., 2022. "Sophisticated deviants: Intelligence and radical economic attitudes," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Bell, Edward & Dawes, Christopher T. & Weinschenk, Aaron & Riemann, Rainer & Kandler, Christian, 2020. "Patterns and sources of the association between intelligence, party identification, and political orientations," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Sterling, Joanna & Jost, John T. & Pennycook, Gordon, 2016. "Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(4), pages 352-360, July.
    5. Lewis, Gary J. & Bates, Timothy C., 2018. "Higher levels of childhood intelligence predict increased support for economic conservatism in adulthood," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 36-41.
    6. Joanna Sterling & John T. Jost & Gordon Pennycook, 2016. "Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(4), pages 352-360, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Chien-An & Bates, Timothy C., 2022. "Sophisticated deviants: Intelligence and radical economic attitudes," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0201474 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Serena Iacobucci & Roberta De Cicco, 2022. "A literature review of bullshit receptivity: Perspectives for an informed policy making against misinformation," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 6(S1), pages 23-40, July.
    4. Onurcan Yilmaz & Sinan Alper, 2019. "The link between intuitive thinking and social conservatism is stronger in WEIRD societies," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(2), pages 156-169, March.
    5. Bell, Edward & Dawes, Christopher T. & Weinschenk, Aaron & Riemann, Rainer & Kandler, Christian, 2020. "Patterns and sources of the association between intelligence, party identification, and political orientations," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Lin, Chien-An & Bates, Timothy C., 2022. "Smart people know how the economy works: Cognitive ability, economic knowledge and financial literacy," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Alexander C. Walker & Martin Harry Turpin & Jennifer A. Stolz & Jonathan A. Fugelsang & Derek J. Koehler, 2019. "Finding meaning in the clouds: Illusory pattern perception predicts receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(2), pages 109-119, March.
    8. Marino, Maria & Iacono, Roberto & Mollerstrom, Johanna, 2024. "(Mis-)Perceptions, information, and political polarization: A survey and a systematic literature review," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Gärtner, Manja & Mollerstrom, Johanna & Seim, David, 2017. "Individual risk preferences and the demand for redistribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 49-55.
    10. Yamagishi, Atsushi, 2020. "School bullying is positively associated with support for redistribution in adulthood," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Andreea-Oana Iacobuță & Mihaela Ifrim, 2020. "Welfare Mentality as a Challenge to European Sustainable Development. What Role for Youth Inclusion and Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Friederike Mengel & Elke Weidenholzer, 2023. "Preferences for redistribution," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1660-1677, December.
    13. Dietmar Fehr & Johanna Mollerstrom & Ricardo Perez-Truglia, 2022. "Your Place in the World: Relative Income and Global Inequality," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 232-268, November.
    14. Carl, Noah, 2018. "IQ and political attitudes across British regions and local authorities," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 169-175.
    15. Lau Lilleholt, 2019. "Cognitive ability and risk aversion: A systematic review and meta analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(3), pages 234-279, May.
    16. Lewis, Gary J. & Bates, Timothy C., 2018. "Higher levels of childhood intelligence predict increased support for economic conservatism in adulthood," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 36-41.
    17. Zakharin, Michael & Bates, Timothy C., 2025. "Higher cognitive ability linked to weaker moral foundations in UK adults," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. Onurcan Yilmaz & S. Adil Saribay, 2017. "The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(2), pages 140-147, March.
    19. Brun, Martín & D'Ambrosio, Conchita & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada & Ramos, Xavier, 2023. "After You. Cognition and Health-Distribution Preferences," IZA Discussion Papers 16126, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Ludeke, Steven G. & Rasmussen, Stig H.R., 2018. "Different political systems suppress or facilitate the impact of intelligence on how you vote: A comparison of the U.S. and Denmark," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-6.
    21. Edwards, Tobias & Dawes, Christopher T. & Willoughby, Emily A. & McGue, Matt & Lee, James J., 2025. "More than g: Verbal and performance IQ as predictors of socio-political attitudes," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:114:y:2026:i:c:s0160289625000893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.