IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v107y2022icp180-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximum weighted likelihood estimator for robust heavy-tail modelling of finite mixture models

Author

Listed:
  • Fung, Tsz Chai

Abstract

Insurance claim severity data are characterized by complex distributional phenomenons, where flexible density estimation tools such as the finite mixture models (FMM) are necessary. However, maximum likelihood estimations (MLE) often produce unstable tail estimates for the FMM. Motivated by this challenge, this article presents a maximum weighted likelihood estimator (MWLE) for robust estimations of heavy-tailed FMM. Under some regularity conditions, the proposed MWLE is consistent and asymptotically normal. Since the MWLE has a probabilistic interpretation, we are able to develop two distinctive versions of the Generalized Expectation-Maximization (GEM) algorithm to estimate the MWLE parameters more efficiently and reliably than the standard gradient-based algorithms. We apply the proposed MWLE to two simulation studies and a real motor insurance dataset to demonstrate that it better extrapolates the extreme losses than the MLE, without sacrificing the flexibility of the FMM in capturing the small attritional claims.

Suggested Citation

  • Fung, Tsz Chai, 2022. "Maximum weighted likelihood estimator for robust heavy-tail modelling of finite mixture models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 180-198.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:107:y:2022:i:c:p:180-198
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.08.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668722001007
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.08.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Gyemin & Scott, Clayton, 2012. "EM algorithms for multivariate Gaussian mixture models with truncated and censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 2816-2829.
    2. Blostein, Martin & Miljkovic, Tatjana, 2019. "On modeling left-truncated loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 35-46.
    3. Jan Beran & Bikramjit Das & Dieter Schell, 2012. "On robust tail index estimation for linear long‐memory processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 406-423, May.
    4. Beran, Jan & Schell, Dieter, 2012. "On robust tail index estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3430-3443.
    5. Zhao, Qian & Brazauskas, Vytaras & Ghorai, Jugal, 2018. "Robust And Efficient Fitting Of Severity Models And The Method Of Winsorized Moments," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(1), pages 275-309, January.
    6. Vytaras Brazauskas & Robert Serfling, 2000. "Robust and Efficient Estimation of the Tail Index of a Single-Parameter Pareto Distribution," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 12-27.
    7. Poudyal, Chudamani, 2021. "Robust Estimation Of Loss Models For Lognormal Insurance Payment Severity Data," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(2), pages 475-507, May.
    8. Verbelen, Roel & Gong, Lan & Antonio, Katrien & Badescu, Andrei & Lin, Sheldon, 2015. "Fitting Mixtures Of Erlangs To Censored And Truncated Data Using The Em Algorithm," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 729-758, September.
    9. Harald Dornheim & Vytaras Brazauskas, 2007. "Robust and Efficient Methods for Credibility When Claims Are Approximately Gamma-Distributed," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 138-158.
    10. Abu Bakar, S.A. & Hamzah, N.A. & Maghsoudi, M. & Nadarajah, S., 2015. "Modeling loss data using composite models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 146-154.
    11. Tsz Chai Fung & Andrei L. Badescu & X. Sheldon Lin, 2022. "Fitting Censored and Truncated Regression Data Using the Mixture of Experts Models," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 496-520, November.
    12. Marianthi Markatou, 2000. "Mixture Models, Robustness, and the Weighted Likelihood Methodology," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 483-486, June.
    13. Robert Serfling, 2002. "Efficient and Robust Fitting of Lognormal Distributions," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 95-109.
    14. Simon Lee & X. Lin, 2010. "Modeling and Evaluating Insurance Losses Via Mixtures of Erlang Distributions," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 107-130.
    15. Miljkovic, Tatjana & Grün, Bettina, 2016. "Modeling loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 387-396.
    16. Chengping Gong & Chengxiu Ling, 2018. "Robust Estimations for the Tail Index of Weibull-Type Distribution," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Mortaza Jamshidian & Robert I. Jennrich, 1997. "Acceleration of the EM Algorithm by using Quasi‐Newton Methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(3), pages 569-587.
    18. Vytaras Brazauskas, 2009. "Robust and Efficient Fitting of Loss Models," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 356-369.
    19. Paul Embrechts & Sidney Resnick & Gennady Samorodnitsky, 1999. "Extreme Value Theory as a Risk Management Tool," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 30-41.
    20. Brazauskas, Vytaras & Serfling, Robert, 2003. "Favorable Estimators for Fitting Pareto Models: A Study Using Goodness-of-fit Measures with Actual Data," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 365-381, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Semhar Michael & Tatjana Miljkovic & Volodymyr Melnykov, 2020. "Mixture modeling of data with multiple partial right-censoring levels," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 355-378, June.
    2. Reynkens, Tom & Verbelen, Roel & Beirlant, Jan & Antonio, Katrien, 2017. "Modelling censored losses using splicing: A global fit strategy with mixed Erlang and extreme value distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 65-77.
    3. Delong, Łukasz & Lindholm, Mathias & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2021. "Gamma Mixture Density Networks and their application to modelling insurance claim amounts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 240-261.
    4. Počuča, Nikola & Jevtić, Petar & McNicholas, Paul D. & Miljkovic, Tatjana, 2020. "Modeling frequency and severity of claims with the zero-inflated generalized cluster-weighted models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 79-93.
    5. Bhati, Deepesh & Ravi, Sreenivasan, 2018. "On generalized log-Moyal distribution: A new heavy tailed size distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 247-259.
    6. Blostein, Martin & Miljkovic, Tatjana, 2019. "On modeling left-truncated loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 35-46.
    7. Igor Fedotenkov, 2020. "A Review of More than One Hundred Pareto-Tail Index Estimators," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 80(3), pages 245-299.
    8. Miljkovic, Tatjana & Grün, Bettina, 2016. "Modeling loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 387-396.
    9. Shi, Yue & Punzo, Antonio & Otneim, Håkon & Maruotti, Antonello, 2023. "Hidden semi-Markov models for rainfall-related insurance claims," Discussion Papers 2023/17, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    10. Roel Verbelen & Katrien Antonio & Gerda Claeskens, 2016. "Multivariate mixtures of Erlangs for density estimation under censoring," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 429-455, July.
    11. Chengping Gong & Chengxiu Ling, 2018. "Robust Estimations for the Tail Index of Weibull-Type Distribution," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Milan Stehlík & Rastislav Potocký & Helmut Waldl & Zdeněk Fabián, 2010. "On the favorable estimation for fitting heavy tailed data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 485-503, September.
    13. Brazauskas, Vytaras & Kleefeld, Andreas, 2009. "Robust and efficient fitting of the generalized Pareto distribution with actuarial applications in view," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 424-435, December.
    14. Alessandro Staino & Emilio Russo & Massimo Costabile & Arturo Leccadito, 2023. "Minimum capital requirement and portfolio allocation for non-life insurance: a semiparametric model with Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) constraint," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-32, December.
    15. Luis Rincón & David J. Santana, 2022. "Ruin Probability for Finite Erlang Mixture Claims Via Recurrence Sequences," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 2213-2236, September.
    16. Jan Beran & Dieter Schell & Milan Stehlík, 2014. "The harmonic moment tail index estimator: asymptotic distribution and robustness," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 66(1), pages 193-220, February.
    17. Sebastian Calcetero-Vanegas & Andrei L. Badescu & X. Sheldon Lin, 2023. "Claim Reserving via Inverse Probability Weighting: A Micro-Level Chain-Ladder Method," Papers 2307.10808, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    18. Ahmed Z. Afify & Ahmed M. Gemeay & Noor Akma Ibrahim, 2020. "The Heavy-Tailed Exponential Distribution: Risk Measures, Estimation, and Application to Actuarial Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-28, August.
    19. Mohamed E. Ghitany & Emilio Gómez-Déniz & Saralees Nadarajah, 2018. "A New Generalization of the Pareto Distribution and Its Application to Insurance Data," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Ruben Dewitte & Michel Dumont & Glenn Rayp & Peter Willemé, 2022. "Unobserved heterogeneity in the productivity distribution and gains from trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 1566-1597, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Generalized expectation-maximization algorithm; M-estimator; Random truncation; Regularly varying function; Multimodal distribution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:107:y:2022:i:c:p:180-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.