IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v40y2018icp42-53.html

Does knowledge retrieval improves work efficiency? An investigation under multiple systems use

Author

Listed:
  • Sutanto, Juliana
  • Liu, Yi
  • Grigore, Mihai
  • Lemmik, Rivo

Abstract

Organizations encourage active knowledge retrieval from knowledge management systems; however, this does not always lead to higher work efficiency. Anchoring on uses and gratifications theory and psychology of sunk cost, this study investigates knowledge workers’ knowledge retrieval behavior and its subsequent impact on their work efficiency under three knowledge management systems, which differ in the creators of the systems and their related contents. Survey and interview data were collected from an IT call-center company. The results show knowledge workers who actively retrieved knowledge from the organization-created system that contains self-created content exhibited higher work efficiency. The results also show they obtained gratifications from actively retrieving knowledge from a self-made system; however, due to the workers’ biased perceptions toward that system, knowledge retrieval from a self-made system did not induce higher work efficiency. The findings provide organizations suggestions for designing knowledge management systems and their related contents.

Suggested Citation

  • Sutanto, Juliana & Liu, Yi & Grigore, Mihai & Lemmik, Rivo, 2018. "Does knowledge retrieval improves work efficiency? An investigation under multiple systems use," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 42-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:40:y:2018:i:c:p:42-53
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401217309301
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atreyi Kankanhalli & Bernard C.Y. Tan & Kwok‐Kee Wei, 2005. "Understanding seeking from electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical study," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 56(11), pages 1156-1166, September.
    2. Sarma Nidumolu, 1995. "The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 191-219, September.
    3. Wei He & Yulin Fang & Kwok‐Kee Wei, 2009. "The role of trust in promoting organizational knowledge seeking using knowledge management systems: An empirical investigation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(3), pages 526-537, March.
    4. Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio, 2017. "Using knowledge management systems: A taxonomy of SME strategies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1551-1562.
    5. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    6. Samuelson, William & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1988. "Status Quo Bias in Decision Making," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 7-59, March.
    7. Chunke Su & Noshir Contractor, 2011. "A multidimensional network approach to studying team members' information seeking from human and digital knowledge sources in consulting firms," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1257-1275, July.
    8. Jon Hartwick & Henri Barki, 1994. "Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 440-465, April.
    9. Jung‐Yu Lai, 2009. "How reward, computer self‐efficacy, and perceived power security affect knowledge management systems success: An empirical investigation in high‐tech companies," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(2), pages 332-347, February.
    10. Chunke Su & Noshir Contractor, 2011. "A multidimensional network approach to studying team members' information seeking from human and digital knowledge sources in consulting firms," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1257-1275, July.
    11. Dong-Gil Ko & Alan R. Dennis, 2011. "Profiting from Knowledge Management: The Impact of Time and Experience," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 134-152, March.
    12. Ivy L.B. Liu & Christy M.K. Cheung & Matthew K.O. Lee, 2016. "User satisfaction with microblogging: Information dissemination versus social networking," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(1), pages 56-70, January.
    13. Chen, Chung-Jen & Huang, Jing-Wen, 2009. "Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance -- The mediating role of knowledge management capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 104-114, January.
    14. Sharon Watson & Kelly Hewett, 2006. "A Multi‐Theoretical Model of Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Determinants of Knowledge Contribution and Knowledge Reuse," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 141-173, March.
    15. Peter H. Gray & Darren B. Meister, 2004. "Knowledge Sourcing Effectiveness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(6), pages 821-834, June.
    16. John C. Henderson & Soonchul Lee, 1992. "Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 757-777, June.
    17. Arkes, Hal R. & Blumer, Catherine, 1985. "The psychology of sunk cost," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 124-140, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ni, Zi-jian & Rong, Lili & Wang, Ning & Cao, Shuo, 2019. "Knowledge model for emergency response based on contingency planning system of China," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 10-22.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Akansha Mer & Amarpreet Singh Virdi, 2023. "Modeling Millennials’ Adoption Intentions of E-banking: Extending UTAUT with Perceived Risk and Trust," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 12(4), pages 425-438, December.
    3. Alexandra Durcikova & Kelly J. Fadel & Brian S. Butler & Dennis F. Galletta, 2011. "Research Note ---Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation: The Impacts of Psychological Climate and Knowledge Management System Access," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 855-866, December.
    4. Chulmo Koo & Namho Chung & Juyeon Ham, 2017. "Assessing the User Resistance to Recommender Systems in Exhibition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Donglin Han & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Hao Wu & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Modelling Tourists’ Acceptance of Hotel Experience-Enhancement Smart Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Xiaoxiao Gong & Yang Zhang & Menghan Wang & Xuetao Jiang, 2025. "Understanding Individuals’ Adoption of Digital Currency Electronic Payment in China: A Dual-Stage Analysis of PLS-SEM and BPNN," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    7. Ann-Frances Cameron & Jane Webster, 2013. "Multicommunicating: Juggling Multiple Conversations in the Workplace," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 352-371, June.
    8. Zhang, Yixiang & Fang, Yulin & Wei, Kwok-Kee & Chen, Huaping, 2010. "Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 425-436.
    9. Gartner, Johannes & Fink, Matthias & Maresch, Daniela, 2022. "The Role of Fear of Missing Out and Experience in the Formation of SME Decision Makers’ Intentions to Adopt New Manufacturing Technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    10. Kovic, Marko, 2020. "Rationalität in der Praxis: Definitionen, Herausforderungen, Optimierungsstrategien," SocArXiv a9436, Center for Open Science.
    11. Aurora I. Maynez Guaderrama & Judith Cavazos Arroyo & Santiago Ibarreche Suarez & Jose Pablo Nuno de la Parra, 2012. "Identification Of Common Factors In Tacit Knowledge Transference Within Organizations, Identificacion De Factores Comunes Estudiados, Relacionados Con La Transferencia De Conocimiento Tacito Dentro De Las Organizaciones," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 103-117.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13000 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Xiaoyang Long & Javad Nasiry & Yaozhong Wu, 2020. "A Behavioral Study on Abandonment Decisions in Multistage Projects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 1999-2016, May.
    14. Dmitry Khanin & Raj V. Mahto, 2013. "Do Venture Capitalists Have a Continuation Bias?," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 22(2), pages 203-222, September.
    15. He, Xin & Mittal, Vikas, 2007. "The effect of decision risk and project stage on escalation of commitment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 225-237, July.
    16. Kathryn Kadous & Lisa M. Sedor, 2004. "The Efficacy of Third†Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role of Mental Representations," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 55-82, March.
    17. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Wastyn, Annelies, 2009. "Does professional knowledge management improve innovation performance at the firm level?," ZEW Discussion Papers 09-067, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Julia Blasch & Claudio Daminato, 2018. "Behavioral anomalies and energy-related individual choices: the role of status-quo bias," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 18/300, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    19. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & J. Sánchez-Fernández, 2018. "A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 25-64, March.
    20. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13613 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Sánchez-Fernández, Juan & Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco, 2014. "The moderating effect of experience in the adoption of mobile payment tools in Virtual Social Networks: The m-Payment Acceptance Model in Virtual Social Networks (MPAM-VSN)," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 151-166.
    22. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Davis, Fred D. & Zhu, Yaping, 2022. "A cultural contingency model of knowledge sharing and job performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 202-219.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:40:y:2018:i:c:p:42-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.