IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v56y2025ics1467089525000302.html

A practical guide to implementing ChatGPT as a secondary coder in qualitative research

Author

Listed:
  • Blondeel, Eva
  • Everaert, Patricia
  • Opdecam, Evelien

Abstract

Analyzing interview data provides in-depth insights into qualitative research topics, but is often a time-consuming and costly process. This research aims to enhance this process by leveraging transformative technologies influencing the accounting field, like ChatGPT. ChatGPT is capable of generating human-like text and performing text-based analyses by using a pre-trained model. Specifically, this research illustrates ChatGPT’s role as a secondary coder in deductive qualitative accounting research, analyzing interview transcripts using content analysis with a predefined coding scheme. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 36 business economics students. First, the primary researcher manually analyzed the data using a deductive approach. Next, a second human researcher and ChatGPT (ChatGPT-4o Plus) were appointed as secondary coders to independently verify and validate the coding. The paper demonstrates ChatGPT’s potential to assist in coding interview transcripts, emphasizing its role as a supplementary tool in qualitative research. The coding results from both secondary coders were compared with those of the primary human coder, revealing over 99% agreement for both secondary coders. In addition, a step-by-step illustration, best practices, prompts, and critical reflections are shared. This study serves as a foundational step in understanding and leveraging ChatGPT’s use in the analysis of interview transcripts.

Suggested Citation

  • Blondeel, Eva & Everaert, Patricia & Opdecam, Evelien, 2025. "A practical guide to implementing ChatGPT as a secondary coder in qualitative research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:56:y:2025:i:c:s1467089525000302
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089525000302
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee D. Parker & Deryl Northcott, 2016. "Qualitative generalising in accounting research: concepts and strategies," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 1100-1131, August.
    2. Lies Bouten & Patricia Everaert & Luc Van Liedekerke & Lieven De Moor & Johan Christiaens, 2011. "Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 187-204, September.
    3. Lee Parker, 2014. "Qualitative perspectives: through a methodological lens," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 13-28, April.
    4. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-04-2015-2026 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-06-2020-4609 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Julian Junyan Wang & Victor Xiaoqi Wang, 2025. "Assessing Consistency and Reproducibility in the Outputs of Large Language Models: Evidence Across Diverse Finance and Accounting Tasks," Papers 2503.16974, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    7. Downen, Tom & Kim, Sarah & Lee, Lorraine, 2024. "Algorithm aversion, emotions, and investor reaction: Does disclosing the use of AI influence investment decisions?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    8. Lee D. Parker, 2020. "The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(8), pages 1943-1967, July.
    9. Gu, Hanchi & Schreyer, Marco & Moffitt, Kevin & Vasarhelyi, Miklos, 2024. "Artificial intelligence co-piloted auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Lee D. Parker & Deryl Northcott, 2016. "Qualitative generalising in accounting research: concepts and strategies," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 1100-1131, August.
    11. Murphy, Brid & Feeney, Orla & Rosati, Pierangelo & Lynn, Theo, 2024. "Exploring accounting and AI using topic modelling," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    12. Lee Parker, 2014. "Qualitative perspectives: through a methodological lens," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 13-28, April.
    13. Fabio Motoki & Valdemar Pinho Neto & Victor Rodrigues, 2024. "More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 3-23, January.
    14. Ties de Kok, 2025. "ChatGPT for Textual Analysis? How to Use Generative LLMs in Accounting Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7888-7906, September.
    15. Sutton, Steve G. & Arnold, Vicky & Holt, Matthew, 2023. "An extension of the theory of technology dominance: Capturing the underlying causal complexity," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    16. Booker, Adam & Chiu, Victoria & Groff, Nathan & Richardson, Vernon J., 2024. "AIS research opportunities utilizing Machine Learning: From a Meta-Theory of accounting literature," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    17. Lukka, Kari & Modell, Sven, 2010. "Validation in interpretive management accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 462-477, May.
    18. Wood, David A. & Achhpilia, Muskan P. & Adams, Mollie T. & Aghazadeh, Sanaz & Akinyele, Kazeem & Akpan, Mfon & Allee, Kristian D. & Allen, Abigail M. & Almer, Elizabeth D. & Ames, Daniel & Arity, Vikt, 2023. "The ChatGPT artificial intelligence chatbot: How well does it answer accounting assessment questions?," Other publications TiSEM b4a29b3e-18a1-4259-a70c-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sun, Yijia & Zheng, Chundong & Ma, Ke, 2026. "Speaking of facts or experiences? The interaction effect between description types of virtual influencers and product types on endorsement effectiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Stratopoulos, Theophanis C. & Wang, Victor Xiaoqi, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and accounting research: a framework and agenda," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Blondeel, Eva & Bullock, Taylor & Gaskin, James & Schuetzler, Ryan & Serre, Rachel & Steffen, Jacob & Wells, Taylor M. & Wood, David A., 2025. "The effects of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on learning in an accounting data analytics course," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stratopoulos, Theophanis C. & Wang, Victor Xiaoqi, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and accounting research: a framework and agenda," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    2. Simon Jehnen & Joaqu'in Ordieres-Mer'e & Javier Villalba-D'iez, 2025. "FinTextSim: Enhancing Financial Text Analysis with BERTopic," Papers 2504.15683, arXiv.org.
    3. Golyagina, Alena & Valuckas, Danielius, 2020. "Boundary-work in management accounting: The case of hybrid professionalism," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    4. Bamber, Matthew & Tekathen, Matthäus, 2023. "Beyond the pages of the ‘how-to’ textbook: A study of the lived experiences of the accounting ethnographer," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Janie Bérubé & Yves Gendron, 2023. "Developing Ethical Sensitivity in Future Accounting Practitioners: The Case of a Dialogic Learning for Final-Year Undergraduates," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 763-781, March.
    6. Chiara Civera & Sara Moggi & Valentina Chiaudano & Edward R. Freeman, 2025. "Stakeholder Relationships in the Circular Economy. Conceptualizing Relational Approaches Through Systematic Literature Review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10698-10722, December.
    7. Bianchi, Lara & Passetti, Emilio & Contrafatto, Massimo, 2025. "The (non)enactment of intelligent accountability through stakeholder engagement: A micro-processual perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(6).
    8. Craft Amanda & Brimble Mark & Cull Michelle & MacDonald Kirsten & Hunt Katherine, 2025. "Practice-Based Knowledge Perspectives of Cultural Competence in Australian Financial Advice," Financial Planning Research Journal, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25.
    9. Dominik Anderhofstadt & Nicolene Wesson & Suzette Viviers, 2025. "Corporate governance and the internationalisation of African firms: An institutional investor perspective," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 644-657, September.
    10. Melinda Timea Fülöp & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Dan Ioan Topor, 2025. "Digital business world and ethical dilemmas: a systematic literature review," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 23-41, March.
    11. van Erp, Wil & Roozen, Frans & Vosselman, Ed, 2019. "The performativity of a management accounting and control system: Exploring the dynamic relational consequences of a design," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    12. Fotoh, Lazarus Elad & Mugwira, Tatenda, 2025. "Exploring Large Language Models in external audits: Implications and ethical considerations," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Sumit Lodhia, 2019. "What about your qualitative cousins? Adapting the pitching template to qualitative research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 309-329, March.
    14. Martin R. W. Hiebl & Barbara Mayrleitner, 2019. "Professionalization of management accounting in family firms: the impact of family members," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 1037-1068, November.
    15. Loai Ali Zeenalabden Ali Alsaid & Jean Claude Mutiganda, 2023. "ABC as a Multi-Lens Sustainability Reporting System in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Kingston, Kylie L. & Furneaux, Craig & de Zwaan, Laura & Alderman, Lyn, 2023. "Avoiding the accountability ‘sham-ritual’: An agonistic approach to beneficiaries’ participation in evaluation within nonprofit organisations," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Modell, Sven & Yang, ChunLei, 2018. "Financialisation as a strategic action field: An historically informed field study of governance reforms in Chinese state-owned enterprises," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-59.
    19. van Weeren, Michelle & Bluntz, Clarence, 2025. "What makes a rating useable? Shifting epistemic practices in the ESG rating field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Maha Faisal Alsayegh, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:56:y:2025:i:c:s1467089525000302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.