IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/finprj/v11y2025i1p25n1002.html

Practice-Based Knowledge Perspectives of Cultural Competence in Australian Financial Advice

Author

Listed:
  • Craft Amanda

    (Western Sydney University Parramatta, NSW AUSTRALIA)

  • Brimble Mark

    (Griffith University)

  • Cull Michelle

    (Western Sydney University Parramatta, NSW AUSTRALIA)

  • MacDonald Kirsten

    (Griffith University)

  • Hunt Katherine

    (Ardentura Consulting)

Abstract

Cultural competence has been cited as a key contributor to the pursuit of ethical and professional standards in a variety of professions (Tully 2020; Osborn & Karandikar 2023). There has, however, been little attention in the literature on the implications of cultural competence concerning the provision of financial advice. The discussion about the operationalisation of culturally aware approaches and behaviours in professional advice settings may be advanced by using practice-based knowledge. This qualitative study is a first attempt to assemble the experiences and insights of financial advice professionals across Australia to identify key aspects of adapting to the cultural diversity of Australian society. The experiences and views of 21 Australian financial advisers from various backgrounds using a combination of narrative and thematic analytic methodologies was applied. Four distinct themes were identified within the separate domains of 1) lack of visible diversity, 2) concerns of bias and labels, 3) perceived limitations and challenges in cultural competence, and 4) pathways to acquiring cultural competence. We conclude that the profession needs to do more to lift the cultural confidence and competence of financial advice practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Craft Amanda & Brimble Mark & Cull Michelle & MacDonald Kirsten & Hunt Katherine, 2025. "Practice-Based Knowledge Perspectives of Cultural Competence in Australian Financial Advice," Financial Planning Research Journal, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:finprj:v:11:y:2025:i:1:p:25:n:1002
    DOI: 10.2478/fprj-2025-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/fprj-2025-0001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/fprj-2025-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee D. Parker & Deryl Northcott, 2016. "Qualitative generalising in accounting research: concepts and strategies," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 1100-1131, August.
    2. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-04-2015-2026 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Lee D. Parker & Deryl Northcott, 2016. "Qualitative generalising in accounting research: concepts and strategies," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 1100-1131, August.
    4. Michelle Cull & Glenda Davis, 2013. "Students' Perceptions of a Scaffolded Approach to Learning Financial Planning: An Empirical Study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 125-146, April.
    5. Yan Chen & Sherry Xin Li, 2009. "Group Identity and Social Preferences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(1), pages 431-457, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bianchi, Lara & Passetti, Emilio & Contrafatto, Massimo, 2025. "The (non)enactment of intelligent accountability through stakeholder engagement: A micro-processual perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(6).
    2. Dominik Anderhofstadt & Nicolene Wesson & Suzette Viviers, 2025. "Corporate governance and the internationalisation of African firms: An institutional investor perspective," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 644-657, September.
    3. Melinda Timea Fülöp & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Dan Ioan Topor, 2025. "Digital business world and ethical dilemmas: a systematic literature review," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 23-41, March.
    4. Loai Ali Zeenalabden Ali Alsaid & Jean Claude Mutiganda, 2023. "ABC as a Multi-Lens Sustainability Reporting System in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Blondeel, Eva & Everaert, Patricia & Opdecam, Evelien, 2025. "A practical guide to implementing ChatGPT as a secondary coder in qualitative research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    6. Bamber, Matthew & Tekathen, Matthäus, 2023. "Beyond the pages of the ‘how-to’ textbook: A study of the lived experiences of the accounting ethnographer," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Janie Bérubé & Yves Gendron, 2023. "Developing Ethical Sensitivity in Future Accounting Practitioners: The Case of a Dialogic Learning for Final-Year Undergraduates," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 763-781, March.
    8. Kingston, Kylie L. & Furneaux, Craig & de Zwaan, Laura & Alderman, Lyn, 2023. "Avoiding the accountability ‘sham-ritual’: An agonistic approach to beneficiaries’ participation in evaluation within nonprofit organisations," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Chiara Civera & Sara Moggi & Valentina Chiaudano & Edward R. Freeman, 2025. "Stakeholder Relationships in the Circular Economy. Conceptualizing Relational Approaches Through Systematic Literature Review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10698-10722, December.
    10. David J. Cooper & Krista Saral & Marie Claire Villeval, 2021. "Why Join a Team?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6980-6997, November.
    11. Delaney, Jason & Jacobson, Sarah, 2014. "Those outsiders: How downstream externalities affect public good provision," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 340-352.
    12. Tommaso Colussi & Ingo E. Isphording & Nico Pestel, 2021. "Minority Salience and Political Extremism," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(3), pages 237-271, July.
    13. Astrid Dannenberg & Carlo Gallier, 2020. "The choice of institutions to solve cooperation problems: a survey of experimental research," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(3), pages 716-749, September.
    14. Victor Gay, 2023. "Culture: An Empirical Investigation of Beliefs, Work, and Fertility. A Verification and Reproduction of Fernández and Fogli (2009)," Post-Print hal-04194417, HAL.
    15. Gantner, Anita & Horn, Kristian & Kerschbamer, Rudolf, 2016. "Fair and efficient division through unanimity bargaining when claims are subjective," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 56-73.
    16. Nattavudh Powdthavee & Yohanes E Riyanto & Erwin C L Wong & Jonathan X W Yeo & Qi Yu Chan, 2021. "When face masks signal social identity: Explaining the deep face-mask divide during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, June.
    17. Karl McShane, 2017. "Getting Used to Diversity? Immigration and Trust in Sweden," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 1895-1910.
    18. Martin G. Kocher & Fangfang Tan & Jing Yu, 2018. "Providing Global Public Goods: Electoral Delegation And Cooperation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 381-397, January.
    19. Abraham Aldama & Daniel Draganoff & Gantavya Pahwa, 2024. "An experiment in the role of identity in fostering coordination," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 10(2), pages 294-309, December.
    20. Alan P. Kwan & S. Alex Yang & Angela Huyue Zhang, 2024. "Crowd-Judging on Two-Sided Platforms: An Analysis of In-Group Bias," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2459-2476, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:finprj:v:11:y:2025:i:1:p:25:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.