IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v56y2025ics1467089525000107.html

Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in auditing: Evidence from the field

Author

Listed:
  • Kokina, Julia
  • Blanchette, Shay
  • Davenport, Thomas H.
  • Pachamanova, Dessislava

Abstract

In this study we research the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in auditing by large public accounting firms, with emphasis on its challenges and opportunities. Some previous studies point to delayed adoption of AI in auditing due to regulations and the need for additional safeguards while others document extensive AI implementation. To address this dissensus, we conducted 22 interviews with experienced audit professionals. We find that “simple AI” technologies such as key data extraction from documents and optical character recognition are used widely in audits while “complex AI” tools are only being developed. We find RPA is used to automate repetitive administrative processes while the use of RPA for audit tasks is not as common. We also find that the main AI adoption challenges are related to transparency and explainability, AI bias, data privacy, robustness and reliability, fear of auditor overreliance on AI, and the need for AI guidance. We present ideas for addressing these challenges based on our research and lessons from other fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Kokina, Julia & Blanchette, Shay & Davenport, Thomas H. & Pachamanova, Dessislava, 2025. "Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in auditing: Evidence from the field," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:56:y:2025:i:c:s1467089525000107
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089525000107
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James A. Diao & Jason K. Wang & Wan Fung Chui & Victoria Mountain & Sai Chowdary Gullapally & Ramprakash Srinivasan & Richard N. Mitchell & Benjamin Glass & Sara Hoffman & Sudha K. Rao & Chirag Mahesh, 2021. "Human-interpretable image features derived from densely mapped cancer pathology slides predict diverse molecular phenotypes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Esan, Oladapo Christopher & Shi, Xingyi & Dai, Yichen & An, Liang & Zhao, T.S., 2022. "Operation of liquid e-fuel cells using air as oxidant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    3. Anastassia Fedyk & James Hodson & Natalya Khimich & Tatiana Fedyk, 2022. "Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 938-985, September.
    4. Davenport, Thomas H., 2018. "The AI Advantage: How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262039176, December.
    5. Changyu Hu & Yuetong Li & Xiaojia Zheng, 2022. "Data assets, information uses, and operational efficiency," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(60), pages 6887-6900, December.
    6. Huang, Xiaowei & Li, Lvzhou, 2022. "Query complexity of unitary operation discrimination," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    7. Sarah Lebovitz & Hila Lifshitz-Assaf & Natalia Levina, 2022. "To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 126-148, January.
    8. Arnold, Vicky & Collier, Philip A. & Leech, Stewart A. & Rose, Jacob M. & Sutton, Steve G., 2023. "Can knowledge based systems be designed to counteract deskilling effects?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Yaxiao Lian & Dongchen Lan & Shiyu Xing & Bingbing Guo & Zhixiang Ren & Runchen Lai & Chen Zou & Baodan Zhao & Richard H. Friend & Dawei Di, 2022. "Ultralow-voltage operation of light-emitting diodes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Huafeng (Jason) Chen & Jason V Chen & Feng Li & Pengfei Li, 2022. "Measuring Operating Leverage [Measuring economic policy uncertainty]," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 112-154.
    11. Ivy Munoko & Helen L. Brown-Liburd & Miklos Vasarhelyi, 2020. "The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 209-234, November.
    12. Huaiyang Zhong & Margaret L. Brandeau & Golnaz Eftekhari Yazdi & Jianing Wang & Shayla Nolen & Liesl Hagan & William W. Thompson & Sabrina A. Assoumou & Benjamin P. Linas & Joshua A. Salomon, 2022. "Metamodeling for Policy Simulations with Multivariate Outcomes," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(7), pages 872-884, October.
    13. Leonid Kogan & Jun Li & Harold Zhang, 2022. "Operating Hedge and Gross Profitability Premium," NBER Working Papers 30241, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Praz, 2022. "Scaling Operations," Springer Books, in: Link Technology to Your Long-Term Business Goals, chapter 0, pages 91-101, Springer.
    15. Mukund Sundararajan & Amir Najmi, 2019. "The many Shapley values for model explanation," Papers 1908.08474, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.
    16. Perdana, Arif & Lee, W. Eric & Mui Kim, Chu, 2023. "Prototyping and implementing Robotic Process Automation in accounting firms: Benefits, challenges and opportunities to audit automation," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    17. Zhang, Chanyuan (Abigail) & Cho, Soohyun & Vasarhelyi, Miklos, 2022. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    18. Kokina, Julia & Blanchette, Shay, 2019. "Early evidence of digital labor in accounting: Innovation with Robotic Process Automation," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Farooq, Fatima & Jadoon, Atif Khan & Ali, Amjad & Audi, Marc, 2026. "Artificial Intelligence Controls and Earnings Management Intention: The Mediating Role of Ethical Decision-Making," MPRA Paper 129349, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Osama Abouelela & Ahmed Diab & Safaa Saleh, 2025. "The Relationship Between AI and Audit Planning in Emerging Economies: Does Audit Firm Size Matter?," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    3. Stratopoulos, Theophanis C. & Wang, Victor Xiaoqi, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and accounting research: a framework and agenda," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    4. Elsayed, Nader, 2025. "Strategic AI disclosures and legitimacy: Impression management in UK FTSE100 annual reports," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed, Faroque & Gurdgiev, Constantin & Sohag, Kazi & Islam, Md. Monirul & Zeqiraj, Veton, 2024. "Global, local, or glocal? Unravelling the interplay of geopolitical risks and financial stress," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Carmen Elena Stoenoiu, 2025. "Perspectives on the development of digital techniques and tools with implications for accounting and financial audit services," GATR Journals jfbr232, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    3. Delia DELIU, 2024. "Professional Judgment and Skepticism Amidst the Interaction of Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 22(176), pages 724-741, October.
    4. Vitali, Sonia & Giuliani, Marco, 2024. "Emerging digital technologies and auditing firms: Opportunities and challenges," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Karim, Mohammed Shamsul & Nahar, Sharmin & Demirbag, Mehmet, 2022. "Resource-Based Perspective on ICT Use and Firm Performance: A Meta-analysis Investigating the Moderating Role of Cross-Country ICT Development Status," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    6. Sebastian Bartsch & Oliver Behn & Alexander Benlian & Roger Brownsword & Sebastian Bücker & Marcus Düwell & Nico Formánek & Marc Jungtäubl & Michael Leyer & Alexander Richter & Jan-Hendrik Schmidt & M, 2025. "Governance of High-Risk AI Systems in Healthcare and Credit Scoring," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 67(4), pages 563-581, August.
    7. Li, Yueqi & Goel, Sanjay, 2025. "Bridging IT auditors and AI auditing: Understanding pathways to effective IT audits of AI-driven processes," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    8. Sutton, Steve G. & Arnold, Vicky & Holt, Matthew, 2023. "An extension of the theory of technology dominance: Capturing the underlying causal complexity," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Stratopoulos, Theophanis C. & Wang, Victor Xiaoqi, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and accounting research: a framework and agenda," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    10. Marc Eulerich & Aida Sanatizadeh & Hamid Vakilzadeh & David A. Wood, 2024. "Is it all hype? ChatGPT’s performance and disruptive potential in the accounting and auditing industries," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 2318-2349, September.
    11. Fotoh, Lazarus Elad & Mugwira, Tatenda, 2025. "Exploring Large Language Models in external audits: Implications and ethical considerations," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    12. repec:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:10:p:2406-2413 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Lombardi, Danielle R. & Kim, Meehyun & Sipior, Janice C. & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2025. "The increased role of advanced technology and automation in audit: A delphi study," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Tian, Xinci & Ma, Yueyue, 2026. "Digital asset intensity and strategic disclosure effects on firm performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Dinko Herman BOIKANYO, 2024. "Utilization Of 4ir Technologies To Enhance Strategic Intelligence And Dynamic Capabilities For A Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 5-24, March.
    16. Annika Mies & Tim Gruchmann & Stefan Gold, 2026. "Conceptualising the Socio-material Context: An Ethical Enquiry into the Contextual Materialisation of Paradoxes in Transport Logistics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 107-139, January.
    17. Yang, Liguo & Li, Jingjing & Liu, Xintong, 2026. "Can corporate data assets gain preference? Evidence from supply chain financing," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    19. Shrutika Mishra & A. R. Tripathi, 2021. "AI business model: an integrative business approach," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Uklańska Anna, 2023. "Robotic Process Automation (RPA) – Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 129-140, January.
    21. Cong Cheng & Hongfang Cui, 2024. "Combining digital and legacy technologies: firm digital transformation strategies—evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:56:y:2025:i:c:s1467089525000107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.