IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v122y2018i6p652-659.html

Out-of-pocket costs, primary care frequent attendance and sample selection: Estimates from a longitudinal cohort design

Author

Listed:
  • Pymont, Carly
  • McNamee, Paul
  • Butterworth, Peter

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of out-of-pocket costs on subsequent frequent attendance in primary care using data from the Personality and Total Health (PATH) Through Life Project, a representative community cohort study from Canberra, Australia. The analysis sample comprised 1197 respondents with two or more GP consultations, and uses survey data linked to administrative health service use (Medicare) data which provides data on the number of consultations and out-of-pocket costs. Respondents identified in the highest decile of GP use in a year were defined as Frequent Attenders (FAs). Logistic regression models that did not account for potential selection effects showed that out-of-pocket costs incurred during respondents’ prior two consultations were significantly associated with subsequent FA status. Respondents who incurred higher costs ($15–$35; or >$35) were less likely to become FAs than those who incurred no or low (

Suggested Citation

  • Pymont, Carly & McNamee, Paul & Butterworth, Peter, 2018. "Out-of-pocket costs, primary care frequent attendance and sample selection: Estimates from a longitudinal cohort design," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 652-659.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:122:y:2018:i:6:p:652-659
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016885101830068X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Government of India, 2017. "National Health Policy 2017," Working Papers id:11664, eSocialSciences.
    2. Raz, Iris & Novack, Lena & Yitshak-Sade, Maayan & Shahar, Yemima & Wiznitzer, Arnon & Sergienko, Ruslan & Warshawsky-Livne, Lora, 2015. "Effects of changes in copayment for obstetric emergency room visits on the utilization of obstetric emergency rooms," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(10), pages 1358-1365.
    3. Nolan, Anne & Smith, Samantha, 2012. "The effect of differential eligibility for free GP services on GP utilisation in Ireland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1644-1651.
    4. Aviva Aron-Dine & Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein, 2013. "The RAND Health Insurance Experiment, Three Decades Later," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 197-222, Winter.
    5. Astrid Kiil & Kurt Houlberg, 2014. "How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(8), pages 813-828, November.
    6. Glynn, Adam N. & Quinn, Kevin M., 2010. "An Introduction to the Augmented Inverse Propensity Weighted Estimator," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 36-56, January.
    7. Gourzoulidis, George & Kourlaba, Georgia & Stafylas, Panagiotis & Giamouzis, Gregory & Parissis, John & Maniadakis, Nikolaos, 2017. "Association between copayment, medication adherence and outcomes in the management of patients with diabetes and heart failure," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(4), pages 363-377.
    8. Ferraro, K.F. & Su, Y.-P., 2000. "Physician-evaluated and self-reported morbidity for predicting disability," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(1), pages 103-108.
    9. Vedsted, Peter & Fink, Per & Sørensen, H.T.Henrik Toft & Olesen, Frede, 2004. "Physical, mental and social factors associated with frequent attendance in Danish general practice. A population-based cross-sectional study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 813-823, August.
    10. Knott, Rachel J. & Petrie, Dennis J. & Heeley, Emma L. & Chalmers, John P. & Clarke, Philip M., 2015. "The effects of reduced copayments on discontinuation and adherence failure to statin medication in Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 620-627.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Devereux & Mona Balesh Abadi & Farah Omran, 2019. "Correcting for Transitory Effects in RCTs: Application to the RAND Health Insurance Experiment," Working Papers 201910, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    2. Niklas Jakobsson & Mikael Svensson, 2016. "The effect of copayments on primary care utilization: results from a quasi-experiment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(39), pages 3752-3762, August.
    3. Vanessa Cirulli & Giuliano Resce & Marco Ventura, 2024. "Co-payment exemption and healthcare consumption: quasi-experimental evidence from Italy," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 355-380, July.
    4. Philipp Hafner & Jörg C. Mahlich, 2016. "Determinants of physician's office visits and potential effects of co-payments: evidence from Austria," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 192-203, July.
    5. Jakobsson, Niklas & Svensson, Mikael, 2016. "Copayments and physicians visits: A panel data study of Swedish regions 2003–2012," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(9), pages 1095-1099.
    6. Simona Gamba & Niklas Jakobsson & Mikael Svensson, 2022. "The impact of cost-sharing on prescription drug demand: evidence from a double-difference regression kink design," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(9), pages 1591-1599, December.
    7. Juan, Tzu-Ling & Chang, Li-Chuan & Lee, Yue-Chune, 2022. "Copayment policy reforms and effective care utilization by patients with persistent asthma in Taiwan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 143-150.
    8. Noemi Kreif & Richard Grieve & Rosalba Radice & Zia Sadique & Roland Ramsahai & Jasjeet S. Sekhon, 2012. "Methods for Estimating Subgroup Effects in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses That Use Observational Data," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(6), pages 750-763, November.
    9. Raúl Del Pozo-Rubio & Pablo Moya-Martínez & Marta Ortega-Ortega & Juan Oliva-Moreno, 2020. "Shadow and extended shadow cost sharing associated to informal long-term care: the case of Spain," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Jouko Verho & Jarkko Harju, 2023. "Moral Hazard in Drug Purchases," Working Papers 12, Finnish Centre of Excellence in Tax Systems Research.
    11. Tajul Masron & Mduduzi Biyase & Talent Zwane & Thomas Udimal & Frederich Kirsten, 2023. "Ecological footprint and population health outcomes: an analysis of E7 countries," Economics Working Papers edwrg-07-2023, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, South Africa, revised 2023.
    12. G. Kent Fellows & Daniel J. Dutton & Aidan Hollis, 2018. "Making Sure Orphan Drugs Don’t Get Left Behind," SPP Communique, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 10(6), August.
    13. Sallin, Aurelién, 2021. "Estimating returns to special education: combining machine learning and text analysis to address confounding," Economics Working Paper Series 2109, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    14. Christopher J. Ruhm, 2019. "Shackling the Identification Police?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(4), pages 1016-1026, April.
    15. Shawhan, Daniel L. & Picciano, Paul D., 2019. "Costs and benefits of saving unprofitable generators: A simulation case study for US coal and nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 383-400.
    16. Jones, Ian Rees & Ahmed, Nilufar & Kelly, Moira & Bothamley, Graham & Rajakulasingam, Raja & Victor, Christina & O'Malley, Anne & Griffiths, Chris, 2008. "With an attack I associate it more with going into hospital: Understandings of asthma and psychosocial stressors; are they related to use of services?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 765-775, February.
    17. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Maria Polyakova, 2018. "Private Provision of Social Insurance: Drug-Specific Price Elasticities and Cost Sharing in Medicare Part D," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 122-153, August.
    18. Immaculate Sabelile Muthathi & Mary Kawonga & Laetitia Charmaine Rispel, 2021. "Using social network analysis to examine inter-governmental relations in the implementation of the Ideal Clinic Realisation and Maintenance programme in two South African provinces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Katerina Sherstyuka & Dolgorsuren Dorjb & Gerard Russo, 2014. "Health Insurance and the Labor Market with Wage Rigidities: Insights from a Laboratory Experiment," Working Papers 201427, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
    20. Meghan Jenkins Morales & Stephanie A Robert & Deborah Carr, 0. "Black–White Disparities in Moves to Assisted Living and Nursing Homes Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries," Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(9), pages 1972-1982.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:122:y:2018:i:6:p:652-659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.