IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v170y2025ics1389934124002429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing homestead agroforestry-based livelihoods in Sivasagar District of Assam, India, using livelihood significance index (LSI)

Author

Listed:
  • Das, Barasha Rani
  • Bhuyan, Manash Jyoti
  • Deka, Nityananda
  • Bhattacharya, Prasanta

Abstract

This study evaluates the significance of homestead agroforestry (HAF) systems for rural livelihoods in Sivasagar District of Assam, India, using Livelihood Significance Index (LSI). The research integrates both quantitative and qualitative methods to offer a comprehensive analysis of how HAF systems contribute to rural livelihoods. The study reveals that the importance of various HAF plant species has undergone significant shifts over the past decade due to socio-economic changes, such as rising household expenses, market-oriented economic transitions, and urbanization. Among these species, Bambusa arundinacea has the highest livelihood significance, with an average LSI of 2.79, although this has decreased by 0.71 % from 2012 to 2022. Conversely, Tectona grandis, despite its low livelihood significance, has experienced a decadal increase in LSI of 20.5 %. This indicates that, while such species currently play a lesser role in community livelihoods, their importance is gradually increasing due to their economic benefits. The study also identifies several challenges, including the loss of traditional knowledge, the vulnerability of agroforestry systems to environmental changes, and difficulties in maintaining biodiversity amidst market pressures. To address these issues, the study advocates for sustainable agroforestry practices in the district that integrate both traditional and economically valuable species while improving market access for traditional products. In flood-prone villages like Afala, introducing flood-resistant species such as Mangifera indica, Artocarpus heterophyllus, and Bambusa arundinacea, along with training in value-added production, can enhance resilience and livelihood sustainability. Together, these approaches aim to cultivate a resilient and sustainable agroforestry landscape in Sivasagar District and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Das, Barasha Rani & Bhuyan, Manash Jyoti & Deka, Nityananda & Bhattacharya, Prasanta, 2025. "Assessing homestead agroforestry-based livelihoods in Sivasagar District of Assam, India, using livelihood significance index (LSI)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:170:y:2025:i:c:s1389934124002429
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124002429
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel deHaan & Helen Hambly Odame & Naresh Thevathasan & Sarath P. Nissanka, 2020. "Local Knowledge and Perspectives of Change in Homegardens: A Photovoice Study in Kandy District, Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Chambers, Robert, 1994. "Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(9), pages 1253-1268, September.
    3. Habtewold Atiso & Fekadu Fanjana, 2020. "Contribution of Agroforestry Home gardens to Household Income Generation in Boloso Bombe District, Southern Ethiopia," Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 25(1), pages 52-63, October.
    4. Chambers, Robert, 1994. "Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(10), pages 1437-1454, October.
    5. Chambers, Robert, 1994. "The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 953-969, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chilombo, Andrew & Van Der Horst, Dan, 2021. "Livelihoods and coping strategies of local communities on previous customary land in limbo of commercial agricultural development: Lessons from the farm block program in Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Glyn Williams & Manoj Srivastava & Stuart Corbridge & René Véron, 2003. "Enhancing pro-poor governance in Eastern India: participation, politics and action research," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 3(2), pages 159-178, April.
    3. Palash Kamruzzaman, 2020. "Exploring the Nexus Between Participation and Empowerment," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 5(1), pages 32-53, January.
    4. Jinnat Ara & Dipanwita Sarkar & Jayanta Sarkar, 2021. "Like mother like daughter? Occupational mobility among children under asset transfer program in Bangladesh," QuBE Working Papers 061, QUT Business School.
    5. Thomas, David H. L. & Adams, William M., 1999. "Adapting to Dams: Agrarian Change Downstream of the Tiga Dam, Northern Nigeria," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 919-935, June.
    6. Bond, Richard & Hulme, David, 1999. "Process Approaches to Development: Theory and Sri Lankan Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 1339-1358, August.
    7. García-Ponce, E. & Gómez-Macpherson, H. & Diallo, O. & Djibril, M. & Baba, C. & Porcel, O. & Mathieu, B. & Comas, J. & Mateos, L. & Connor, D.J., 2013. "Contribution of sorghum to productivity of small-holder irrigation schemes: On-farm research in the Senegal River Valley, Mauritania," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 72-82.
    8. Alix-Garcia, Jennifer M. & Sims, Katharine R.E. & Costica, Laura, 2021. "Better to be indirect? Testing the accuracy and cost-savings of indirect surveys," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Gladwin, Christina H. & Peterson, Jennifer S. & Mwale, Abiud C., 2002. "The Quality of Science in Participatory Research: A Case Study from Eastern Zambia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 523-543, April.
    10. Loader, R. & Amartya, L., 1999. "Participatory Rural Appraisal: extending the research methods base," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 73-85, November.
    11. Coffin, Jeanne L. & Monje, Fred & Asiimwe-Karimu, Grace & Amuguni, Hellen Janetrix & Odoch, Terence, 2015. "A One Health, participatory epidemiology assessment of anthrax (Bacillus anthracis) management in Western Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 44-50.
    12. Alastair Orr & Takuji Tsusaka & Sabine Homann Kee‐Tui & Harry Msere, 2016. "What Do We Mean by ‘Women's Crops'? Commercialisation, Gender and the Power to Name," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 919-937, August.
    13. John Thompson, 1996. "Moving the Indigenous Knowledge Debate Forward?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 14(1), pages 105-112, March.
    14. Shibu Das & Kaushal Kumar Sharma & Suranjan Majumder & Indrajit Roy Chowdhury, 2025. "Evaluating sustainable agricultural livelihood security in West Bengal, India: a principal component analysis approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4769-4816, February.
    15. Varma, Deepak Suresh & Nandanan, Krishna & P C, Vishakh Raja & B, Soundharajan & Pérez, Mireia López & K A, Sidharth & Ramesh, Maneesha Vinodini, 2021. "Participatory design approach to address water crisis in the village of Karkatta, Jharkhand, India," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    16. Alexandra Titz & Terry Cannon & Fred Krüger, 2018. "Uncovering ‘Community’: Challenging an Elusive Concept in Development and Disaster Related Work," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-28, August.
    17. Jinnat Ara & Dipanwita Sarkar, 2021. "Customized Credit Transfer and Women Empowerment: Evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials in Bangladesh," QuBE Working Papers 062, QUT Business School.
    18. Michener, Victoria J., 1998. "The participatory approach: Contradiction and co-option in Burkina Faso," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(12), pages 2105-2118, December.
    19. Toan, Dang Ngoc, 2012. "Participation in Development: A Case Study on Local Participation in Rural Water Supply and Sanitation in Vietnam," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 2(03), pages 1-25, September.
    20. Ross, Heather M. & Pine, Kathleen H. & Curran, Sarah & Augusta, Dawn, 2022. "Pathway mapping as a tool to address police use of force in behavioral health crisis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:170:y:2025:i:c:s1389934124002429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.