IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v135y2022ics1389934121002525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the externalities of timber production

Author

Listed:
  • Pukkala, Timo

Abstract

Responsible forest policy promotes management that does not impair the multiple uses of forests or decrease their regulative effects and biological diversity. The most important regulative effect of boreal forests is their ability to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. High biological diversity improves the resilience of forest ecosystems and forest-based economies, enhancing the long-term sustainability of forest production. This study developed a method for assessing the performance of forest management in terms of its effects on multiple uses, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration. These externalities were described with 11 indicator variables, which can be calculated for any Finnish forest stand from the current forest inventory data with currently available models and algorithms. The indicator variables were normalized based on the ranges of the indicator variables in Finnish forests on different sites. The forest-level averages of the normalized indicator variables were used to calculate a multiplicative externality score for the forest. The developed method for calculating the forest-wide externality score was used in two forest holdings for alternative silvicultural systems. The case study results suggested that continuous cover management enhances the positive externalities of timber production, as compared to even-aged rotation forestry. Green-tree retention improved the externality score in both silvicultural systems. Maximizing the net present value of timber production in rotation forestry decreased the externality score by about 50% compared to a non-managed forest. The decrease was about 30% smaller in continuous cover forestry.

Suggested Citation

  • Pukkala, Timo, 2022. "Assessing the externalities of timber production," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:135:y:2022:i:c:s1389934121002525
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934121002525
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Koenker, 2017. "Quantile Regression: 40 Years On," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 155-176, September.
    2. Lahdelma, Risto & Hokkanen, Joonas & Salminen, Pekka, 1998. "SMAA - Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 137-143, April.
    3. Roger Koenker, 2017. "Quantile regression 40 years on," CeMMAP working papers CWP36/17, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    4. Juutinen, Artti & Kurttila, Mikko & Pohjanmies, Tähti & Tolvanen, Anne & Kuhlmey, Katharina & Skudnik, Mitja & Triplat, Matevž & Westin, Kerstin & Mäkipää, Raisa, 2021. "Forest owners' preferences for contract-based management to enhance environmental values versus timber production," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    6. Douglas, Paul H, 1976. "The Cobb-Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some New Empirical Values," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(5), pages 903-915, October.
    7. Tamiz, Mehrdad & Jones, Dylan & Romero, Carlos, 1998. "Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 569-581, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pascual, Adrián & Guerra-Hernández, Juan, 2022. "Spatial connectivity in tree-level decision-support models using mathematical optimization and individual tree mapping," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed, Walid M.A., 2021. "Stock market reactions to upside and downside volatility of Bitcoin: A quantile analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. Anne M. Lausier & Shaleen Jain, 2018. "Diversity in global patterns of observed precipitation variability and change on river basin scales," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 261-275, July.
    3. Guillen, Montserrat & Bermúdez, Lluís & Pitarque, Albert, 2021. "Joint generalized quantile and conditional tail expectation regression for insurance risk analysis," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Rui Evangelista & João Andrade E Silva & Esmeralda A. Ramalho, 2021. "How heterogeneous is the impact of energy efficiency on dwelling prices? Evidence from the application of the unconditional quantile hedonic model to the Portuguese residential market," Working Papers REM 2021/0186, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    5. Chen, Xiaohong & Pouzo, Demian & Powell, James L., 2019. "Penalized sieve GEL for weighted average derivatives of nonparametric quantile IV regressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 30-53.
    6. Jayeeta Bhattacharya, 2020. "Quantile regression with generated dependent variable and covariates," Papers 2012.13614, arXiv.org.
    7. Damian Clarke & Manuel Llorca Jaña & Daniel Pailañir, 2023. "The use of quantile methods in economic history," Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 115-132, April.
    8. Petrella, Lea & Raponi, Valentina, 2019. "Joint estimation of conditional quantiles in multivariate linear regression models with an application to financial distress," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 70-84.
    9. Hatice Jenkins & Ezuldeen Alshareef & Amer Mohamad, 2023. "The impact of corruption on commercial banks' credit risk: Evidence from a panel quantile regression," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1364-1375, April.
    10. Avinno Faruk, 2021. "Analysing the glass ceiling and sticky floor effects in Bangladesh: evidence, extent and elements," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(9), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Sánchez Serrano, Antonio, 2021. "The impact of non-performing loans on bank lending in Europe: An empirical analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    12. Vidal-Llana, Xenxo & Guillén, Montserrat, 2022. "Cross-sectional quantile regression for estimating conditional VaR of returns during periods of high volatility," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    13. Chong-Chuo Chang & Oshamah Lin Lin & Oshamah Yu-Cheng Chang & Oshamah Kun-Zhan Hsu, 2023. "Impact of Financial Liberalization on Firm Risk," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 27(3), pages 14-45, September.
    14. Rita Pimentel & Morten Risstad & Sjur Westgaard, 2022. "Predicting interest rate distributions using PCA & quantile regression," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 291-311, December.
    15. Chen, Le-Yu & Lee, Sokbae, 2023. "Sparse quantile regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2195-2217.
    16. Xianling Ren & Xinping Yu, 2024. "Hedging performance analysis of energy markets: Evidence from copula quantile regression," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 432-450, March.
    17. Sulkhan Chavleishvili & Simone Manganelli, 2024. "Forecasting and stress testing with quantile vector autoregression," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 66-85, January.
    18. Holly Brannelly & Andrea Macrina & Gareth W. Peters, 2019. "Quantile Diffusions for Risk Analysis," Papers 1912.10866, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    19. Yingying Jiang & Fuming Lin & Yong Zhou, 2021. "The kth power expectile regression," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(1), pages 83-113, February.
    20. Xenxo Vidal-Llana & Carlos Salort Sánchez & Vincenzo Coia & Montserrat Guillen, 2022. ""Non-Crossing Dual Neural Network: Joint Value at Risk and Conditional Tail Expectation estimations with non-crossing conditions"," IREA Working Papers 202215, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Oct 2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:135:y:2022:i:c:s1389934121002525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.