IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v85y2025ipbs1544612325012383.html

Is it difficult to predict the price movements of high-volatility assets

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Zhichao
  • Xu, Yuhong
  • Zhang, Yue
  • Zhao, Xinyao

Abstract

Predicting the price movements of assets with high volatility is typically considered challenging. However, the hybrid model we propose demonstrates that, for such assets, forecasting the direction of price movement is not significantly more difficult than in low-volatility contexts. Rather, the key challenge lies only in the level accuracy of predicted price. Nevertheless, for trading purposes, the direction of price movement is often more crucial. To capture mixed patterns in price sequences, we first decompose the original time series into several mode components by Time Varying Filtering based Empirical Mode Decomposition (TVF-EMD). Then we employ Deep Extreme Learning Machines (DELM) to model the nonlinearity of the prediction function and utilizes the state-of-the-art Marine Predators Algorithm (MPA), a swarm intelligence algorithm, to optimize both the intrinsic parameters and hyperparameters of the deep network. Moreover, by incorporating a specially designed fitness function that accounts for directional errors, we significantly enhance price trend prediction in high-volatility scenarios. Finally, the trading strategy derived from our hybrid model yields a 69.10% more profit in the back-testing of weekly prediction than the Buy & Hold strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Zhichao & Xu, Yuhong & Zhang, Yue & Zhao, Xinyao, 2025. "Is it difficult to predict the price movements of high-volatility assets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:85:y:2025:i:pb:s1544612325012383
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.107980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325012383
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shifei Ding & Nan Zhang & Xinzheng Xu & Lili Guo & Jian Zhang, 2015. "Deep Extreme Learning Machine and Its Application in EEG Classification," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-11, May.
    2. Du, Pei & Guo, Ju’e & Sun, Shaolong & Wang, Shouyang & Wu, Jing, 2021. "Multi-step metal prices forecasting based on a data preprocessing method and an optimized extreme learning machine by marine predators algorithm," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    4. Liu, Mingxi & Li, Guowen & Li, Jianping & Zhu, Xiaoqian & Yao, Yinhong, 2021. "Forecasting the price of Bitcoin using deep learning," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    5. Mohamed A. M. Shaheen & Dalia Yousri & Ahmed Fathy & Hany M. Hasanien & Abdulaziz Alkuhayli & S. M. Muyeen, 2020. "A Novel Application of Improved Marine Predators Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization for Solving the ORPD Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. An, Jongbong & Jeon, Junkee & Kim, Takwon, 2025. "Optimal portfolio and retirement decisions with costly job switching options," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 491(C).
    2. Anne Lavigne, 2006. "Gouvernance et investissement des fonds de pension privés aux Etats-Unis," Working Papers halshs-00081401, HAL.
    3. An Chen & Thai Nguyen & Thorsten Sehner, 2022. "Unit-Linked Tontine: Utility-Based Design, Pricing and Performance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Alan J. Auerbach, 1981. "Evaluating the Taxation of Risky Assets," NBER Working Papers 0806, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Hong, Claire Yurong & Lu, Xiaomeng & Pan, Jun, 2021. "FinTech adoption and household risk-taking," BOFIT Discussion Papers 14/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    6. Curatola, Giuliano, 2022. "Price impact, strategic interaction and portfolio choice," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Auffret, Philippe, 2001. "An alternative unifying measure of welfare gains from risk-sharing," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2676, The World Bank.
    8. Luca De Gennaro Aquino & Sascha Desmettre & Yevhen Havrylenko & Mogens Steffensen, 2024. "Equilibrium control theory for Kihlstrom-Mirman preferences in continuous time," Papers 2407.16525, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    9. Chen, An & Hieber, Peter & Sureth, Caren, 2022. "Pay for tax certainty? Advance tax rulings for risky investment under multi-dimensional tax uncertainty," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 273, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    10. Ellwanger, Reinhard & Snudden, Stephen, 2025. "Putting VAR forecasts of the real price of crude oil to the test," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Mayank Goel & Suresh Kumar K., 2006. "A Risk-Sensitive Portfolio Optimisation Problem with Stochastic Interest Rate," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 5(3), pages 263-282, December.
    12. Andreas Fagereng & Luigi Guiso & Davide Malacrino & Luigi Pistaferri, 2020. "Heterogeneity and Persistence in Returns to Wealth," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 115-170, January.
    13. Yuqian Xu & Lingjiong Zhu & Michael Pinedo, 2020. "Operational Risk Management: A Stochastic Control Framework with Preventive and Corrective Controls," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1804-1825, November.
    14. Martin Herdegen & David Hobson & Joseph Jerome, 2025. "Proper solutions for Epstein–Zin stochastic differential utility," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 885-932, July.
    15. Yuki SHIGETA, 2022. "A Continuous-Time Utility Maximization Problem with Borrowing Constraints in Macroeconomic Heterogeneous Agent Models:A Case of Regular Controls under Markov Chain Uncertainty," Discussion papers e-22-009, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    16. John H. Cochrane, 1999. "New facts in finance," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 23(Q III), pages 36-58.
    17. Dokuchaev, Nikolai, 2010. "Optimality of myopic strategies for multi-stock discrete time market with management costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 551-556, January.
    18. Mr. Christopher Carroll & Mr. Martin Sommer & Mr. Jiri Slacalek, 2012. "Dissecting Saving Dynamics: Measuring Wealth, Precautionary, and Credit Effects," IMF Working Papers 2012/219, International Monetary Fund.
    19. Bihary, Zsolt & Víg, Attila András, 2018. "Portfólióallokáció csődveszély esetén, korlátolt felelősség mellett [Portfolio allocation in case of failure risk in the presence of limited liability]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 711-725.
    20. Dong, Yinghui & Zheng, Harry, 2019. "Optimal investment of DC pension plan under short-selling constraints and portfolio insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 47-59.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:85:y:2025:i:pb:s1544612325012383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.