IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v77y2025ics1544612325002454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The “Betting” behavior of mutual fund families

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Yanran
  • Meng, Lili

Abstract

In a world where investors often gamble on the next “big win,” this study exposes the hidden motives and conflicts of interest driving mutual fund families to adopt lottery-like stock strategies. Using a sample of Chinese open-end mutual funds from 2004 to 2022, we find that fund families engage in “betting” by encouraging most, if not all, of their affiliated funds to pursue aggressive lottery-based investments. Although Chinese fund investors do not exhibit a distinct preference for lottery-like stocks, they do chase short-term performance. Our findings suggest that whether fund families can boost fund inflows through a lottery-based strategy hinges on their ability to deliver strong performance. However, fund investors do not hold the entire family of funds, and the performance of individual funds reverses in the latter half of the year—even for those within the most aggressive fund families. As a result, while fund families secure a “double win,” the associated risks and potential losses are ultimately borne by the investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Yanran & Meng, Lili, 2025. "The “Betting” behavior of mutual fund families," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:77:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325002454
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.106981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325002454
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.106981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jang, Jeewon & Kang, Jangkoo, 2019. "Probability of price crashes, rational speculative bubbles, and the cross-section of stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 222-247.
    2. Bali, Turan G. & Cakici, Nusret & Whitelaw, Robert F., 2011. "Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 427-446, February.
    3. Agarwal, Vikas & Jiang, Lei & Wen, Quan, 2022. "Why Do Mutual Funds Hold Lottery Stocks?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(3), pages 825-856, May.
    4. Li, Jennifer (Jie) & Massa, Massimo & Zhang, Hong & Zhang, Jian, 2021. "Air pollution, behavioral bias, and the disposition effect in China," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 641-673.
    5. K. J. Martijn Cremers & Antti Petajisto, 2009. "How Active Is Your Fund Manager? A New Measure That Predicts Performance," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(9), pages 3329-3365, September.
    6. Itzhak Ben-David & Jiacui Li & Andrea Rossi & Yang Song, 2022. "What Do Mutual Fund Investors Really Care About?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(4), pages 1723-1774.
    7. repec:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:5:p:1589-1622 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Samuel M. Hartzmark, 2015. "The Worst, the Best, Ignoring All the Rest: The Rank Effect and Trading Behavior," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 28(4), pages 1024-1059.
    9. Martijn Cremers & Antti Petajisto, 2006. "How Active is Your Fund Manager? A New Measure That Predicts Performance," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2370, Yale School of Management, revised 01 May 2009.
    10. Chengdong Yin, 2016. "The Optimal Size of Hedge Funds: Conflict between Investors and Fund Managers," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 71(4), pages 1857-1894, August.
    11. Akbas, Ferhat & Genc, Egemen, 2020. "Do Mutual Fund Investors Overweight the Probability of Extreme Payoffs in the Return Distribution?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(1), pages 223-261, February.
    12. Martijn Cremers & Antti Petajisto, 2006. "How Active is Your Fund Manager? A New Measure That Predicts Performance," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2370, Yale School of Management, revised 01 May 2009.
    13. Chua, Angeline Kim Pei & Tam, On Kit, 2020. "The shrouded business of style drift in active mutual funds," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Alok Kumar, 2009. "Who Gambles in the Stock Market?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(4), pages 1889-1933, August.
    15. Jie Jiang & David G. Shrider & Huangwen Ting & Yanran Wu, 2021. "Are mutual fund investors loss averse? Evidence from China," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 56(2), pages 231-250, May.
    16. Christopher P. Clifford & Jon A. Fulkerson & Russell Jame & Bradford D. Jordan, 2021. "Salience and Mutual Fund Investor Demand for Idiosyncratic Volatility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 5234-5254, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Bin & Shen, Yifan & Jin, Xuejun & Xu, Qi, 2022. "Does prospect theory explain mutual fund performance? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Chang, Xiaochen & Guo, Songlin & Huang, Junkai, 2022. "Kidnapped mutual funds: Irrational preference of naive investors and fund incentive distortion," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Yi, Li & Yan, Yuelin, 2024. "Fund tournaments and style drift," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    4. Stein, Roberto, 2023. "Are mutual fund managers good gamblers?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Chen, Qi & Wang, Peng & Yang, Dong, 2025. "Mutual fund style drift measured using higher moments and its cash flow incentive," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Aineas Mallios & Taylan Mavruk, 2025. "Do ESG funds engage in portfolio pumping to gain higher flows? An application of Benford's Law," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 1540-1563, April.
    7. Li, Zhiyong & Rao, Xiao, 2023. "Exploring the zoo of predictors for mutual fund performance in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Li, C. Wei & Tiwari, Ashish & Tong, Lin, 2022. "Mutual fund tournaments and fund Active Share," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. Zhang, Ping & Lv, Zi-Xu, 2024. "Is style drift informative? Evidence from mutual funds in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    10. Peng, Cameron & Wang, Chen, 2021. "Factor demand and factor returns," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118884, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Døskeland, Trond & Sjuve, André Wattø & Ørpetveit, Andreas, 2025. "Do fees matter? Investor’s sensitivity to active management fees," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Lai, Chong, 2022. "Investment dynamics of fund managers under evolutionary games," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    13. Yi, Li & Xiao, Li & Liao, Yinkai, 2024. "Network centrality, style drift, and mutual fund performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    14. Yaozhi Chen & Honghong Wei, 2025. "Fund style drift and fund performance: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Agarwal, Vikas & Jiang, Lei & Wen, Quan, 2020. "Why do mutual funds hold lottery stocks?," CFR Working Papers 20-08, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    16. Giuseppe Galloppo, 2021. "Size," Springer Books, in: Asset Allocation Strategies for Mutual Funds, chapter 0, pages 151-190, Springer.
    17. Roy, Suvra & Nguyen, Harvey & Visaltanachoti, Nuttawat, 2023. "Be nice to the air: Severe haze pollution and mutual fund risk," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    18. Kaniel, Ron & Lin, Zihan & Pelger, Markus & Van Nieuwerburgh, Stijn, 2023. "Machine-learning the skill of mutual fund managers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 94-138.
    19. Antoniou, Constantinos & Mitali, Shema F., 2023. "Do stock-level experienced returns influence security selection?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    20. Dallin M. Alldredge, 2020. "Institutional trading, investor sentiment, and lottery‐like stock preferences," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 603-624, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:77:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325002454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.