IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v86y2021ics0149718921000094.html

An evaluation of undergraduate public administration programs at Turkish Universities: Reviewing the literature and proposing a model of cultural competence development

Author

Listed:
  • Hergüner, Burak

Abstract

This study aims to identify the main predictors of cultural competence (CC). In the study, the cultural competence of the public administration students was analyzed. A total of 599 public administration students from twenty public and two foundation universities in eighteen different provinces of Turkey responded to a survey. The questionnaire survey was derived from a literature review; validated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The study proposes a CC evaluation model with five principal attributes: political awareness, civic action, belief in collective action, social justice attitudes, and ethical leadership. Accordingly, the model included 29 items that address all aspects of cultural competence. The model can be used to evaluate the CC level of public administration students. Besides, this model can also be applied in public organizations to evaluate their responsiveness to the public. Because public institutions today are supposed to be responsive to the cultural needs of citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Hergüner, Burak, 2021. "An evaluation of undergraduate public administration programs at Turkish Universities: Reviewing the literature and proposing a model of cultural competence development," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:86:y:2021:i:c:s0149718921000094
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718921000094
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Noordhoek & Raymond Saner, 2005. "Beyond New Public Management. Answering the Claims of both Politics and Society," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 35-53, December.
    2. Yates, Brian T. & Marra, Mita, 2017. "Introduction: Social Return On Investment (SROI)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 95-97.
    3. Vengrin, Courtney & Westfall-Rudd, Donna & Archibald, Thomas & Rudd, Rick & Singh, Kusum, 2018. "Factors affecting evaluation culture within a non-formal educational organization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 75-81.
    4. Jasuja, Guneet Kaur & Chou, Chih-Ping & Bernstein, Karen & Wang, Eric & McClure, Maykami & Pentz, Mary Ann, 2005. "Using structural characteristics of community coalitions to predict progress in adopting evidence-based prevention programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 173-184, May.
    5. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asif Mohammad Shahan & Ferdous Jahan & Rizwan Khair, 2021. "A glimpse of light in darkness: Performance‐based accountability in Bangladesh public administration," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 191-202, October.
    2. Ngarava, Saul & Mushunje, Abbyssinia & Chaminuka, Petronella, 2020. "Qualitative benefits of livestock development programmes. Evidence from the Kaonafatso ya Dikgomo (KyD) Scheme in South Africa," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Tamara Guerrero-Gómez & Andrés Navarro-Galera & David Ortiz-Rodríguez, 2021. "Promoting Online Transparency to Help Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals: An Empirical Study of Local Governments in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Rinor F. Kurteshi, 2018. "Information Sources Supporting Innovation In The Public Sector: The Case Of Kosovo," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3(2), pages 22-31, September.
    5. Dietrich Budäus & Dennis Hilgers, 2009. "Reform des öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesens in Deutschland," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 377-396, January.
    6. Dixon, Keith, 2009. "Calculative practices in higher education: a retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning," MPRA Paper 18295, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Kemmerling, Achim & Bruttel, Oliver, 2005. "New politics in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2005-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Claudiu CICEA, 2020. "Performance In Public Management. A Research Agenda With Bibliometric Approach," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 109-123, December.
    9. Budäus, Dietrich, 2009. "Manifest zum öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesen in Deutschland – Mehr Transparenz, Effektivität und Effizienz in Politik und Verwaltungen durch ein einheitliches doppisches Haushalts- und Rechnungswesen," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 32(3), pages 282-318.
    10. Jari Stenvall & Petri Virtanen, 2017. "Intelligent Public Organisations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 195-209, June.
    11. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    12. Leroux, Erick & Pupion, Pierre-Charles, 2022. "Smart territories and IoT adoption by local authorities: A question of trust, efficiency, and relationship with the citizen-user-taxpayer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. John Wanna, 2010. "Investigating the Reality of Reform in Modern Budgeting," Chapters, in: John Wanna & Lotte Jensen & Jouke de Vries (ed.), The Reality of Budgetary Reform in OECD Nations, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    15. repec:aif:journl:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:64-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Naumenko, Raisa, 2016. "Study Of The Current Status Of Training Of Applicants For Higher Education On The Specialty “Public Management And Administration”," EUREKA: Social and Humanities, Scientific Route OÜ, issue 3, pages 21-28.
    17. Bellò, Benedetta & Spano, Alessandro, 2015. "Governing the purple zone: How politicians influence public managers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 354-365.
    18. Deborah Wilson, 2011. "Comparative Analysis in Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 293-308, February.
    19. Bryan DUFOUR & Francesca PETRELLA & Nadine RICHEZ-BATTESTI, 2020. "Understanding social impact assessment through public value theory: A comparative analysis on work integration social enterprises (WISEs) in France and Denmark," CIRIEC Working Papers 2012, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    20. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6484, April.
    21. Di Virgilio, Francesca & Capalbo, Francesco & Doronzo, Emanuele, 2024. "A bibliometric analysis of digitalization in public sector and human resources management studies. What happened to the trial court organization?," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp24097, University of Molise, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:86:y:2021:i:c:s0149718921000094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.