IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond New Public Management. Answering the Claims of both Politics and Society


  • Peter Noordhoek


  • Raymond Saner



New Public Management held the promise of changing traditional bureaucracies into a results-oriented and transparent form of government. Though many of the principles of NPM are being implemented as a way of thinking about government it has been largely discredited. This paper gives examples from Switzerland and The Netherlands where the premises of NPM have either explicitly or implicitly been rejected. The paper concludes by suggesting reasons that led to the decline of NPM and concludes by offering a ‘conceptual restart’ of public administrative reform. This is based on a constructive mix between aspects of NPM and traditional administration, leading to a New Public Administration. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Noordhoek & Raymond Saner, 2005. "Beyond New Public Management. Answering the Claims of both Politics and Society," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 35-53, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:35-53
    DOI: 10.1007/s1115-004-6133-5

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Justice Nyigmah Bawole & Mohammed Ibrahim, 2016. "Contesting Claims on Measuring Performance in the Public Sector Using Performance Audits: Evidence from the Literature," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 285-299, September.
    2. Ali Farazmand, 2005. "Role of Government in an Era of Total Quality Management (TQM) and Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 201-217, September.
    3. repec:eee:crpeac:v:31:y:2015:i:c:p:44-63 is not listed on IDEAS


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:35-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.