IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v83y2020ics0149718920301786.html

Implementation of physically active lessons: A 2-year follow-up

Author

Listed:
  • Skage, Ingrid
  • Ertesvåg, Sigrun K.
  • Roland, Pål
  • Dyrstad, Sindre M.

Abstract

Combining physical activity and academic content is a promising way to improve health and academic learning in schoolchildren. This paper examined the continuation of physically active lessons (PAL) in five Norwegian elementary schools, two years after a 10-month intervention period, which consisted of weekly minimum 2 x 45 min of PAL. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with nine teachers and five school leaders. The Level of Use instrument was used to assess how the teachers integrated PAL into the school day. Two years after the intervention period, seven of nine teachers conducted PAL regularly, on average one lesson per week. Teachers’ implementation progress varied from struggling with logistics, to stable routine and creative adaption. Perceived benefits for the children, active leadership, and ongoing implementation support seem important for continuation. Introduction of PAL as a school development project, systematic planning from the onset and a gradual introduction of PAL, can be an effective strategy for continuation and long-term sustainability. In addition, the Level of Use instrument was useful to better understand which support mechanisms are needed at different stages in the implementation of PAL.

Suggested Citation

  • Skage, Ingrid & Ertesvåg, Sigrun K. & Roland, Pål & Dyrstad, Sindre M., 2020. "Implementation of physically active lessons: A 2-year follow-up," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:83:y:2020:i:c:s0149718920301786
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718920301786
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnson, Knowlton & Hays, Carol & Center, Hayden & Daley, Charlotte, 2004. "Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: a sustainability planning model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 135-149, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glover, Wiljeana J. & Farris, Jennifer A. & Van Aken, Eileen M. & Doolen, Toni L., 2011. "Critical success factors for the sustainability of Kaizen event human resource outcomes: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 197-213, August.
    2. Krishnadas Nanath & R Radhakrishna Pillai, 2021. "Towards a framework for sustaining Green IT initiatives: an empirical investigation," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 193-206, September.
    3. Davies-Colley, Christian & Smith, Willie, 2012. "Implementing environmental technologies in development situations: The example of ecological toilets," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-8.
    4. Lai, Wen-Hsiang & Lin, Chiu-Ching & Wang, Ting-Chu, 2015. "Exploring the interoperability of innovation capability and corporate sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 867-871.
    5. Alfonso, Moya L. & Nickelson, Jen & Hogeboom, David L. & French, Jennifer & Bryant, Carol A. & McDermott, Robert J. & Baldwin, Julie A., 2008. "Assessing local capacity for health intervention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 145-159, May.
    6. Anees Ikramullah & Niki Koutrou, 2025. "“People Have Nowhere to Go”: Stakeholder Perceptions on Sustainability of Funded Community Sport Programmes," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    7. Velasco, Veronica & Griffin, Kenneth W. & Antichi, Mariella & Celata, Corrado, 2015. "A large-scale initiative to disseminate an evidence-based drug abuse prevention program in Italy: Lessons learned for practitioners and researchers," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 27-38.
    8. Riki Savaya & Gerald Elsworth & Patricia Rogers, 2009. "Projected Sustainability of Innovative Social Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 33(2), pages 189-205, April.
    9. Ahmet Koç & Mert Bastas, 2019. "The Evaluation of the Project School Model in Terms of Organizational Sustainability and Its Effect on Teachers’ Organizational Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Cameron Estrich & Carla L. DeSisto & Ellen Pliska & Christine N. Mackie & Alisa Velonis & Keriann Uesugi & Lisa F. Waddell & Kristin M. Rankin, 2022. "Roles of Social Networking in Complex Multi-agency Implementation Efforts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    11. Baoan Song & Qiyu Sun & Ying Li & Chuanqi Que, 2016. "Evaluating the Sustainability of Community-Based Long-Term Care Programmes: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Roberts-Gray, Cynthia & Gingiss, Phyllis M. & Boerm, Melynda, 2007. "Evaluating school capacity to implement new programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 247-257, August.
    13. Mooss, Angela & Hartman, Megan & Ibañez, Gladys, 2015. "Manual development: A strategy for identifying core components of integrated health programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 57-64.
    14. Jerrard, Jane, 2016. "What does “quality” look like for post-2015 education provision in low-income countries? An exploration of stakeholders’ perspectives of school benefits in village LEAP schools, rural Sindh, Pakistan," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 82-93.
    15. Rosenberg, Alana & Hartwig, Kari & Merson, Michael, 2008. "Government-NGO collaboration and sustainability of orphans and vulnerable children projects in southern Africa," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 51-60, February.
    16. Scheirer, Mary Ann & Hartling, Gretchen & Hagerman, Diane, 2008. "Defining sustainability outcomes of health programs: Illustrations from an on-line survey," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 335-346, November.
    17. Khan, Mishal S. & Pullan, Rachel & Okello, George & Nyikuri, Mary & McKee, Martin & Balabanova, Dina, 2019. "“For how long are we going to take the tablets?” Kenyan stakeholders’ views on priority investments to sustainably tackle soil-transmitted helminths," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 51-59.
    18. Schalock, Robert L. & Lee, Tim & Verdugo, Miguel & Swart, Kees & Claes, Claudia & van Loon, Jos & Lee, Chun-Shin, 2014. "An evidence-based approach to organization evaluation and change in human service organizations evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 110-118.
    19. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Go, Sodam & Zinzow, Heidi & Gray, Aracelis & Gutierrez Barrett, Melissa, 2007. "Analysis of strategic plans to assess planning for sustainability of comprehensive community initiatives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 105-113, February.
    20. Meyers, Duncan C. & Domitrovich, Celene E. & Dissi, Rawan & Trejo, Jordan & Greenberg, Mark T., 2019. "Supporting systemic social and emotional learning with a schoolwide implementation model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 53-61.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:83:y:2020:i:c:s0149718920301786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.