IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v115y2026ics0149718925002162.html

Planning for implementation scale-up of a medication for opioid use disorder program across rural Colorado: Ensuring fit to context

Author

Listed:
  • Amura, Claudia R.
  • Techau, Aimee
  • Ritchie, Natalie D.
  • Sorrell, Tanya R.
  • Weber, Mary
  • Kwan, Bethany M.
  • Morrato, Elaine H.
  • Cook, Paul F.

Abstract

Opioid use is a major public health crisis in the United States. Colorado’s Medication for Opioid Use Disorders (MOUD) program expansion was funded to address this problem in rural counties, which are disproportionately affected. Aligning with a Fit to Context Framework for Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability (F2C D4DS), we used customer discovery and value proposition methods to engage partners in an iterative process of conceptualization and design of a MOUD program to guide implementation scale-up and dissemination plans. Interviews (N = 26) with target adopters and influencers (e.g. pilot and prospective agencies, community partners) revealed expansion barriers of greatest priority to solve: 1) organizations’ capacity to provide MOUD; (2) access to treatment and patient-centered care; (3) service and system coordination; (4) stigma associated with OUD; (5) concerns about financial sustainability; and (6) mandated reporting systems. We used process mapping to analyze each organization’s context, structure, and workflows. This phase of conceptualization led to the design of new MOUD program elements to enhance its value: a clinical toolkit and guidelines, an enhanced data collection system for reporting, a process map, and implementation logic models for integrated patient-centered MOUD treatment and reporting. The F2C D4DS process allowed us to identify needs and benefits of greatest value for adopters, and informed MOUD expansion into areas with high OUD overdose risk across the state, to maximize patient outcomes. This study also contributes to evaluation literature by systematically integrating the pre-implementation phase to enhance contextual fit and sustainability for large-scale MOUD initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Amura, Claudia R. & Techau, Aimee & Ritchie, Natalie D. & Sorrell, Tanya R. & Weber, Mary & Kwan, Bethany M. & Morrato, Elaine H. & Cook, Paul F., 2026. "Planning for implementation scale-up of a medication for opioid use disorder program across rural Colorado: Ensuring fit to context," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:115:y:2026:i:c:s0149718925002162
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925002162
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Ni, 2023. "Handbook of Bayesian Variable Selection," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 118(542), pages 1449-1450, April.
    2. Jin Li & Ye Luo & Xiaowei Zhang, 2021. "Dynamic Selection in Algorithmic Decision-making," Papers 2108.12547, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    3. Xiaoping Liu & Xiao-Bai Li & Sumit Sarkar, 2023. "Cost-Restricted Feature Selection for Data Acquisition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3976-3992, July.
    4. Anh Nguyen & Teck Yong Tan, 2023. "Markets with Within-Type Adverse Selection," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 699-726, May.
    5. Olivier Accominotti & Thilo N H Albers & Kim Oosterlinck, 2024. "Selective Default Expectations," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 37(6), pages 1979-2015.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brander, Michael & Abro, Zewdu & Kassie, Menale & Mittmann, Wolfgang & Stiefel, Lukas & Huss, Matthias, 2025. "Small policy changes can accelerate the adoption of improved on-farm storage among smallholder farmers," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Ma, Xuejiao & Che, Tianqi & Jiang, Qichuan, 2025. "A three-stage prediction model for firm default risk: An integration of text sentiment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Quinn Keefer, 2026. "The spending consequences of COVID-19 stimulus payments: the case of baseball cards," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 1-43, March.
    4. Bloomfield, Adam & Goodman, Lucas & Rao, Manita & Slavov, Sita, 2025. "State Auto-IRA policies and firm behavior: Lessons from administrative tax data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    5. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-03831210 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Liu, Lin, 2024. "The unintended consequence of school suspension: How school suspension impacted future grades and misconduct," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Dmitry Sharapov & Linus Dahlander, 2025. "Selection Regimes and Selection Errors," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 2324-2348, November.
    8. Xinyu Dai, 2025. "Dynamic Decision-Making under Model Misspecification," Papers 2505.14913, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:115:y:2026:i:c:s0149718925002162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.