IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v78y2014icp122-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of Solidago canadensis L. biomass and cattle slurry

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Yiqing
  • Sheng, Hongmei
  • Luo, Yang
  • He, Mulan
  • Li, Xiangkai
  • Zhang, Hua
  • He, Wenliang
  • An, Lizhe

Abstract

SC (Solidago canadensis L.) was digested with CS (cattle slurry). The process stability, methane production by anaerobic digestion, and the efficiency of organic matter removal were measured. The maximum methane production of 143.7 L/kg volatile solids was obtained at a SC:CS ratio of 1:3 and a substrate concentration of 6% (based on volatile solids); however, the difference between total methane production for SC:CS ratios of 1:1 and 1:3 was not significant (p > 0.05). Therefore, based on the SC treatment capacity, the optimum SC:CS ratio is 1:1 for this application. For a 6% substrate concentration, the total methane production (129.6 L/kg volatile solids) at a SC:CS ratio of 1:1 was 123.5% higher than that of a control. The pH was fairly constant (6.8–7.6). The removal efficiencies of total solids, volatile solids, cellulose, hemicellulose, and soluble chemical oxygen demand were 37.3, 41.6, 23.6, 34.8, and 38.8%, respectively, and the T80 was 30.0% shorter than that for maximum methane production. These results indicate that the process stability and methane production efficiency of SC can be improved by CS addition.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Yiqing & Sheng, Hongmei & Luo, Yang & He, Mulan & Li, Xiangkai & Zhang, Hua & He, Wenliang & An, Lizhe, 2014. "Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of Solidago canadensis L. biomass and cattle slurry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 122-127.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:78:y:2014:i:c:p:122-127
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421401069X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krishania, M. & Vijay, V.K. & Chandra, R., 2013. "Methane fermentation and kinetics of wheat straw pretreated substrates co-digested with cattle manure in batch assay," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 359-367.
    2. Jiang, Y. & Heaven, S. & Banks, C.J., 2012. "Strategies for stable anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 206-214.
    3. Gong, Wei-jia & Liang, Heng & Li, Wen-zhe & Wang, Zhen-zhen, 2011. "Selection and evaluation of biofilm carrier in anaerobic digestion treatment of cattle manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3572-3578.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fei Wang & Mengfu Pei & Ling Qiu & Yiqing Yao & Congguang Zhang & Hong Qiang, 2019. "Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Li, Wanwu & Khalid, Habiba & Amin, Farrukh Raza & Zhang, Han & Dai, Zhuangqiang & Chen, Chang & Liu, Guangqing, 2020. "Biomethane production characteristics, kinetic analysis, and energy potential of different paper wastes in anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1081-1088.
    3. Wang, Ruikun & Zhao, Zhenghui & Liu, Jianzhong & Lv, Yukun & Ye, Xuemin, 2016. "Enhancing the storage stability of petroleum coke slurry by producing biogas from sludge fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 319-327.
    4. Yao, Zhiyi & Li, Wangliang & Kan, Xiang & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2017. "Anaerobic digestion and gasification hybrid system for potential energy recovery from yard waste and woody biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 133-145.
    5. Yao, Yiqing & Bergeron, Andre David & Davaritouchaee, Maryam, 2018. "Methane recovery from anaerobic digestion of urea-pretreated wheat straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 139-148.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao, Yiqing & Zhou, Jianye & An, Lizhe & Kafle, Gopi Krishna & Chen, Shulin & Qiu, Ling, 2018. "Role of soil in improving process performance and methane yield of anaerobic digestion with corn straw as substrate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 998-1006.
    2. Sohail Khan & Fuzhi Lu & Muhammad Kashif & Peihong Shen, 2021. "Multiple Effects of Different Nickel Concentrations on the Stability of Anaerobic Digestion of Molasses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Ali, Ghaffar & Nitivattananon, Vilas & Abbas, Sawaid & Sabir, Muazzam, 2012. "Green waste to biogas: Renewable energy possibilities for Thailand's green markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5423-5429.
    5. Coultry, James & Walsh, Eilín & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Energy and economic implications of anaerobic digestion pasteurisation regulations in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 125-128.
    6. Li, Kun & Liu, Ronghou & Sun, Chen, 2016. "A review of methane production from agricultural residues in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 857-865.
    7. Chiu, Su-Fang & Chiu, Juei-Yu & Kuo, Wen-Chien, 2013. "Biological stoichiometric analysis of nutrition and ammonia toxicity in thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of organic substrates under different organic loading rates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 323-329.
    8. Gulhane, Madhuri & Pandit, Prabhakar & Khardenavis, Anshuman & Singh, Dharmesh & Purohit, Hemant, 2017. "Study of microbial community plasticity for anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste in Anaerobic Baffled Reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 59-66.
    9. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    10. Simioni, Taysnara & Agustini, Caroline Borges & Dettmer, Aline & Gutterres, Mariliz, 2022. "Enhancement of biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of leather waste with raw and pretreated wheat straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    11. Amina Mohamed Ali & Md Alam Zahangir & Fatouma Mohamed Abdoul-Latif & Mohammed Saedi Jami & Jalludin Mohamed & Tarik Ainane, 2023. "Hydrolysis of Food Waste with Immobilized Biofilm as a Pretreatment Method for the Enhancement of Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Masebinu, S.O. & Akinlabi, E.T. & Muzenda, E. & Aboyade, A.O., 2019. "A review of biochar properties and their roles in mitigating challenges with anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 291-307.
    13. Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Tassou, Savvas A. & Florides, Georgios, 2012. "An assessment of the biomass potential of Cyprus for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 253-261.
    14. Adhirashree Vannarath & Arun Kumar Thalla, 2020. "Evaluation, ranking, and selection of pretreatment methods for the conversion of biomass to biogas using multi-criteria decision-making approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 510-525, December.
    15. Mosleh Uddin, Md & Wen, Zhiyou & Mba Wright, Mark, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of using corn stover biochar for manure derived renewable natural gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    16. Yao, Yiqing & Luo, Yang & Yang, Yingxue & Sheng, Hongmei & Li, Xiangkai & Li, Tian & Song, Yuan & Zhang, Hua & Chen, Shuyan & He, Wenliang & He, Mulan & Ren, Yubing & Gao, Jiangli & Wei, Yali & An, Li, 2014. "Water free anaerobic co-digestion of vegetable processing waste with cattle slurry for methane production at high total solid content," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 309-313.
    17. Yong, Zihan & Dong, Yulin & Zhang, Xu & Tan, Tianwei, 2015. "Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 527-530.
    18. Sánchez-Sánchez, Consolación & González-González, Almudena & Cuadros-Salcedo, Francisco & Gómez-Serrano, Vicente & Cuadros-Blázquez, Francisco, 2019. "Charcoal as a bacteriological adherent for biomethanation of organic wastes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 336-342.
    19. Hassan, Muhammad & Ding, Weimin & Umar, Muhammad & Hei, Kunlun & Bi, Jinhua & Shi, Zhendan, 2017. "Methane enhancement and asynchronism minimization through co-digestion of goose manure and NaOH solubilized corn stover with waste activated sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1256-1263.
    20. Grosser, Anna, 2018. "Determination of methane potential of mixtures composed of sewage sludge, organic fraction of municipal waste and grease trap sludge using biochemical methane potential assays. A comparison of BMP tes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 488-499.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:78:y:2014:i:c:p:122-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.