IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v49y2013icp47-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive finite element simulation of stack pollutant emissions over complex terrains

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver, A.
  • Montero, G.
  • Montenegro, R.
  • Rodríguez, E.
  • Escobar, J.M.
  • Pérez-Foguet, A.

Abstract

A three-dimensional finite element model for the pollutant dispersion is presented. In these environmental processes over a complex terrain, a mesh generator capable of adapting itself to the topographic characteristics is essential. The first stage of the model consists on the construction of an adaptive tetrahedral mesh of a rectangular region bounded in its lower part by the terrain and in its upper part by a horizontal plane. Once the mesh is constructed, an adaptive local refinement of tetrahedra is used in order to capture the plume rise. Wind measurements are used to compute an interpolated wind field, that is modified by using a mass-consistent model and perturbing its vertical component to introduce the plume rise effect. Then, we use an Eulerian convection–diffusion–reaction model to simulate the pollutant dispersion. In this work, the transport of pollutants is considered and dry deposition is formulated as a boundary condition. The discretization of the stack geometry allows to define the emissions as boundary conditions. The proposed model uses an adaptive finite element space discretization, a Crank-Nicolson time scheme, and a splitting operator. This approach has been applied in La Palma island. Finally, numerical results and conclusions are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver, A. & Montero, G. & Montenegro, R. & Rodríguez, E. & Escobar, J.M. & Pérez-Foguet, A., 2013. "Adaptive finite element simulation of stack pollutant emissions over complex terrains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 47-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:49:y:2013:i:c:p:47-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544212008316
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Czarnowska, Lucyna & Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2012. "Dispersion of pollutants, environmental externalities due to a pulverized coal power plant and their effect on the cost of electricity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 212-219.
    2. Hanjalić, K. & Kenjereš, S., 2005. "Dynamic simulation of pollutant dispersion over complex urban terrains: A tool for sustainable development, control and management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1481-1497.
    3. Nazari, S. & Shahhoseini, O. & Sohrabi-Kashani, A. & Davari, S. & Paydar, R. & Delavar-Moghadam, Z., 2010. "Experimental determination and analysis of CO2, SO2 and NOx emission factors in Iran’s thermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 2992-2998.
    4. He, K. & Lei, Y. & Pan, X. & Zhang, Y. & Zhang, Q. & Chen, D., 2010. "Co-benefits from energy policies in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 4265-4272.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mojtaba Jorli & Steven Van Passel & Hossein Sadeghi & Alireza Nasseri & Lotfali Agheli, 2017. "Estimating Human Health Impacts and Costs Due to Iranian Fossil Fuel Power Plant Emissions through the Impact Pathway Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Kiriyama, Eriko & Kajikawa, Yuya & Fujita, Katsuhide & Iwata, Shuichi, 2013. "A lead for transvaluation of global nuclear energy research and funded projects in Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 145-153.
    3. Qian, Yuan & Scherer, Laura & Tukker, Arnold & Behrens, Paul, 2020. "China's potential SO2 emissions from coal by 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Meng, Ming & Niu, Dongxiao, 2011. "Modeling CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion using the logistic equation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3355-3359.
    5. Bachmann, Till M. & van der Kamp, Jonathan, 2014. "Environmental cost-benefit analysis and the EU (European Union) Industrial Emissions Directive: Exploring the societal efficiency of a DeNOx retrofit at a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 125-139.
    6. Xin-gang, Zhao & Xin, Meng & Ying, Zhou & Pei-ling, Li, 2020. "Policy inducement effect in energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Mu, Yaqian & Wang, Can & Cai, Wenjia, 2018. "The economic impact of China's INDC: Distinguishing the roles of the renewable energy quota and the carbon market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2955-2966.
    8. Safieddin Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad, 2020. "Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 29-37.
    9. Jingbiao Yang & Shengxiang Deng & Hui Xu & Ye Zhao & Changda Nie & Yongju He, 2021. "Investigation and Practical Application of Silica Nanoparticles Composite Underwater Repairing Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-10, April.
    10. Luo, D.K. & Dai, Y.J. & Xia, L.Y., 2011. "Economic evaluation based policy analysis for coalbed methane industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 360-368.
    11. Akpan, P.U. & Fuls, W.F., 2021. "Cycling of coal fired power plants: A generic CO2 emissions factor model for predicting CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    12. Zhongyao Cai & Xiaohui Yang & Huaxing Lin & Xinyu Yang & Ping Jiang, 2022. "Study on the Co-Benefits of Air Pollution Control and Carbon Reduction in the Yellow River Basin: An Assessment Based on a Spatial Econometric Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Zvingilaite, Erika, 2013. "Modelling energy savings in the Danish building sector combined with internalisation of health related externalities in a heat and power system optimisation model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 57-72.
    14. Wei, Xinyang & Tong, Qing & Magill, Iain & Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat & Betz, Regina, 2020. "Evaluation of potential co-benefits of air pollution control and climate mitigation policies for China's electricity sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Halkos, George & Tzeremes, Panagiotis, 2015. "Scenario analysis on greenhouse gas emissions reduction in Southeast Balkans' energy system," MPRA Paper 65280, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Zhang, Yanxia & Wang, Haikun & Liang, Sai & Xu, Ming & Zhang, Qiang & Zhao, Hongyan & Bi, Jun, 2015. "A dual strategy for controlling energy consumption and air pollution in China's metropolis of Beijing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 294-303.
    17. Julien Chevallier, 2013. "At the crossroads: can China grow in a low-carbon way?," Chapters, in: Roger Fouquet (ed.), Handbook on Energy and Climate Change, chapter 31, pages 666-681, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Ma, Ding & Chen, Wenying & Yin, Xiang & Wang, Lining, 2016. "Quantifying the co-benefits of decarbonisation in China’s steel sector: An integrated assessment approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1225-1237.
    19. Jiehui Yuan & Xunmin Ou & Gehua Wang, 2017. "Establishing a Framework to Evaluate the Effect of Energy Countermeasures Tackling Climate Change and Air Pollution: The Example of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Wang, Xingwei & Cai, Yanpeng & Chen, Jiajun & Dai, Chao, 2013. "A grey-forecasting interval-parameter mixed-integer programming approach for integrated electric-environmental management–A case study of Beijing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 334-344.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:49:y:2013:i:c:p:47-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.