IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v347y2026ics0360544226004019.html

Compression scheme comparison for a carbon dioxide energy storage system

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Xintao
  • Jiao, Yuwei
  • Liu, Zhan

Abstract

The gas-liquid type compressed carbon dioxide energy storage is an emerging potential energy storage technology to stable the renewable power output. The trying improvements that this paper is focused on are effective realization of the gas-liquid conversion of the high pressure CO2 without utilizing extra cold sources and efficient allocating the pressure ratio in the compression/expansion lines. Two self-condensing systems with qual pressure ratio and equal outlet temperature arrangements are proposed and evaluated. Numerical simulations to the considered systems are conducted on an in-house code that is compiled with the established energy, exergy and economic mathematical models. Results indicate that the equal outlet temperature system is more suggested due to its lower levelized cost of storage at the optimized operating conditions, being 0.11329 $/kWh when the high-pressure cooler cold-side temperature difference is 11 °C, liquid CO2 temperature is 16 °C and throttling pressure is 7.8 MPa. In the component level, the gas holder and liquid CO2 tank constitute the highest portion to the overall system purchase cost. The compressors, turbines, evaporator and condenser account for the largest share of thermodynamic inefficiencies in sequence. The pinch temperature difference of the condenser and evaporator should not be higher than 8 °C.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Xintao & Jiao, Yuwei & Liu, Zhan, 2026. "Compression scheme comparison for a carbon dioxide energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:347:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226004019
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544226004019
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2026.140298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:347:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226004019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.