IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v32y2007i1p35-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Erdal, Gülistan
  • Esengün, Kemal
  • Erdal, Hilmi
  • Gündüz, Orhan

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine energy consumption of input and output used in sugar beet production, and to make a cost analysis in Tokat, Turkey. Data were collected from 146 sugar beet farms in Tokat, Turkey by using a face-to-face questionnaire performed in January and February 2005. Farms were selected based on random sampling method. The results revealed that total energy consumption in sugar beet production was 39685.51MJha−1, and accounted for 49.33% of fertilizer energy, and 24.16% of diesel energy. The output/input energy ratio was 25.75 and energy productivity was 1.53kgMJha−1. Results further indicated that 82.43% of total energy input was in non-renewable energy form, and only 12.82% was in renewable form. Economic analyses showed that profit–cost ratio of farms was 1.17. The highest energy cost items were labor, land renting, depreciation and fertilizers. Although intensive energy consumption in sugar beet production increased the yield, it also resulted in problems such as global warming, land degradation, nutrient loading and pesticide pollution. Therefore, there is a need to pursue a new policy to force producers to undertake energy-efficient practices to establish sustainable production systems without disrupting the natural resources. In addition, extension activities are needed to improve the efficiency of energy consumption and to sustain the natural resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Erdal, Gülistan & Esengün, Kemal & Erdal, Hilmi & Gündüz, Orhan, 2007. "Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 35-41.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:32:y:2007:i:1:p:35-41
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544206000181
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uhlin, Hans-Erik, 1998. "Why energy productivity is increasing: An I-O analysis of Swedish agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 443-465, April.
    2. Yilmaz, Ibrahim & Akcaoz, Handan & Ozkan, Burhan, 2005. "An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 145-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pahlavan, Reza & Omid, Mahmoud & Akram, Asadollah, 2011. "Energy use efficiency in greenhouse tomato production in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6714-6719.
    2. Pishgar-Komleh, Seyyed Hassan & Keyhani, Alireza & Mostofi-Sarkari, Mohammad Reza & Jafari, Ali, 2012. "Energy and economic analysis of different seed corn harvesting systems in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 469-476.
    3. Bozoğlu, Mehmet & Ceyhan, Vedat, 2009. "Energy conversion efficiency of trout and sea bass production in the Black Sea, Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 199-204.
    4. Burak Saltuk & Barbara Jagosz & Osman Gökdoğan & Roman Rolbiecki & Atılgan Atilgan & Stanisław Rolbiecki, 2022. "An Investigation on the Energy Balance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Orange Production in Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Pishgar Komleh, S.H. & Keyhani, A. & Rafiee, Sh. & Sefeedpary, P., 2011. "Energy use and economic analysis of corn silage production under three cultivated area levels in Tehran province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3335-3341.
    6. Stanisław Bielski & Renata Marks-Bielska & Paweł Wiśniewski, 2022. "Investigation of Energy and Economic Balance and GHG Emissions in the Production of Different Cultivars of Buckwheat ( Fagopyrum esculentum Moench): A Case Study in Northeastern Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Alhajj Ali, Salem & Tedone, Luigi & De Mastro, Giuseppe, 2013. "A comparison of the energy consumption of rainfed durum wheat under different management scenarios in southern Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 308-318.
    8. Zangeneh, Morteza & Omid, Mahmoud & Akram, Asadollah, 2010. "A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 2927-2933.
    9. Torki-Harchegani, Mehdi & Ebrahimi, Rahim & Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki, Mahmood, 2015. "Almond production in Iran: An analysis of energy use efficiency (2008–2011)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 217-224.
    10. Topak, Ramazan & Süheri, Sinan & Acar, Bilal, 2010. "Comparison of energy of irrigation regimes in sugar beet production in a semi-arid region," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5464-5471.
    11. Jekayinfa, S.O. & Adebayo, A.O. & Afolayan, S.O. & Daramola, E., 2013. "On-farm energetics of mango production in Nigeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 60-63.
    12. Salim Almaliki & Nasim Monjezi, 2021. "Using new computer based techniques to optimise energy consumption in agricultural land levelling," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 149-163.
    13. Behroozeh, Samira & Hayati, Dariush & Karami, Ezatollah, 2022. "Determining and validating criteria to measure energy consumption sustainability in agricultural greenhouses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    14. van der Werf, Hayo M. G. & Petit, Jean & Sanders, Joost, 2005. "The environmental impacts of the production of concentrated feed: the case of pig feed in Bretagne," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 153-177, February.
    15. Ghatrehsamani, Shirin & Ebrahimi, Rahim & Kazi, Salim Newaz & Badarudin Badry, Ahmad & Sadeghinezhad, Emad, 2016. "Optimization model of peach production relevant to input energies – Yield function in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province, Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 315-321.
    16. Caroline Ignell & Peter Davies & Cecilia Lundholm, 2013. "Swedish Upper Secondary School Students’ Conceptions of Negative Environmental Impact and Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Kaur, Navneet & Vashist, Krishan Kumar & Brar, A.S., 2021. "Energy and productivity analysis of maize based crop sequences compared to rice-wheat system under different moisture regimes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Barut, Zeliha Bereket & Ertekin, Can & Karaagac, Hasan Ali, 2011. "Tillage effects on energy use for corn silage in Mediterranean Coastal of Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 5466-5475.
    19. Unakıtan, Gökhan & Aydın, Başak, 2018. "A comparison of energy use efficiency and economic analysis of wheat and sunflower production in Turkey: A case study in Thrace Region," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 279-285.
    20. Jéssica Bárbara da Silva & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior & João Gabriel Távora Pedrosa & Aldo Torres Sales & Everardo Valadares de Sa Barretto Sampaio & Rômulo Simões Cezar Menezes & Emmanuel Damilano, 2022. "Energetic and Economic Analysis of Spineless Cactus Biomass Production in the Brazilian Semi-arid Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:32:y:2007:i:1:p:35-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.