IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v320y2025ics0360544225008989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation and scheme comparison of CNG transmission and uploading pipe network system in stranded gas fields

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Guannan
  • Zhang, Wanling
  • Long, Yaomei
  • Li, Chaoyue
  • Gao, Xiufeng
  • Li, Yun
  • Feng, Shiyu

Abstract

Natural gas, as a clean energy source, is gaining popularity in terms of production and consumption. Nevertheless, due to limited gas production, scattered distribution, and challenging topographical conditions in several gas fields, the typical costs associated with pipeline transportation are elevated and impossible to use effectively, leading to "stranded gas fields". To investigate the technological feasibility of uploading CNG to the transmission network, this study compares two uploading schemes: throttling compression upload system(TCUS) and direct compression upload system(DCUS). The simulation model of the CNG transmission and uploading network process was created using Matlab/Simulink software to investigate the effects of the switching pressure differential and regulating pressure on system parameters in the TCUS. Additionally, a comparison between TCUS and DCUS was conducted to analyze the differences in volume flow, unloading rate, energy consumption, and other relevant aspects. The results show that the unloading rate of the CNG uploading system with a compressor is nearly 30 % higher than that of the free unloading system. In the TCUS, the lower the regulating pressure, the faster the pressure drop of the tank, the higher the gas uploading rate, and the higher the total electrical power consumption of the system. The larger the switching pressure differential, the earlier the compressor intervenes, resulting in a faster gas uploading rate, however, this also increases the system's total energy consumption. The difference in gas uploading rates between the TCUS and DCUS is minimal, but the DCUS offers greater advantages in energy consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Guannan & Zhang, Wanling & Long, Yaomei & Li, Chaoyue & Gao, Xiufeng & Li, Yun & Feng, Shiyu, 2025. "Simulation and scheme comparison of CNG transmission and uploading pipe network system in stranded gas fields," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:320:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225008989
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225008989
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shivom Sharma & Iftekhar A. Karimi & Shamsuzzaman Farooq & Lakshminarayanan Samavedham & Rajagopalan Srinivasan, 2022. "Health Monitoring of Pressure Regulating Stations in Gas Distribution Networks Using Mathematical Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Tan, Siah Hong & Barton, Paul I., 2015. "Optimal dynamic allocation of mobile plants to monetize associated or stranded natural gas, part I: Bakken shale play case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1581-1594.
    3. Gulnur Zakirova & Evgeny Krapivsky & Anastasia Berezovskaya & Artem Borisov, 2023. "Storage of Compressed Natural Gases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Dragan Vašalić & Ivan Ivković & Dušan Mladenović & Dragan Sekulić & Dejan Miličević & Edin Suljovrujić, 2024. "Prediction of Fuel and Exhaust Emission Costs of Heavy-Duty Vehicles Intended for Gas Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Khalilpour, Rajab & Karimi, I.A., 2012. "Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 317-328.
    6. Adam Saferna & Piotr Saferna & Szymon Kuczyński & Mariusz Łaciak & Adam Szurlej & Tomasz Włodek, 2024. "Effects of Hydrogen, Methane, and Their Blends on Rapid-Filling Process of High-Pressure Composite Tank," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Xu, Jiuping & Tang, Min & Liu, Tingting & Fan, Lurong, 2024. "Technological paradigm-based development strategy towards natural gas hydrate technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    8. Katerina Shaton, Arild Hervik, and Harald M. Hjelle, 2020. "The Environmental Footprint of Natural Gas Transportation: LNG vs. Pipeline," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 223-242.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Juwon & Seo, Youngkyun & Chang, Daejun, 2016. "Economic evaluation of a new small-scale LNG supply chain using liquid nitrogen for natural-gas liquefaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 154-163.
    2. Eduardo Alarcon-Gerbier & Zarina Chokparova & Nassim Ghondaghsaz & Wanqi Zhao & Hani Shahmoradi-Moghadam & Uwe Aßmann & Orçun Oruç, 2022. "Software-Defined Mobile Supply Chains: Rebalancing Resilience and Efficiency in Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Guo, Yingjian & Hawkes, Adam, 2019. "The impact of demand uncertainties and China-US natural gas tariff on global gas trade," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 205-217.
    4. Brito, T.L.F. & Galvão, C. & Fonseca, A.F. & Costa, H.K.M. & Moutinho dos Santos, E., 2022. "A review of gas-to-wire (GtW) projects worldwide: State-of-art and developments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Liu, Jun & Lan, Jiang-Chen & Wang, Bei-Fu & Liang, Yan-Yan & Liang, De-Qing, 2025. "Research on the gas storage properties of ice and water conversion into methane hydrates in silica gel with various pore sizes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    6. Goodell, John W. & Kumar, Satish & Li, Xiao & Pattnaik, Debidutta & Sharma, Anuj, 2022. "Foundations and research clusters in investor attention: Evidence from bibliometric and topic modelling analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 511-529.
    7. Tan, Siah Hong & Barton, Paul I., 2017. "Optimal shale oil and gas investments in the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 398-422.
    8. Dzikri Firmansyah Hakam & Ayodele O. Asekomeh, 2018. "Gas Monetisation Intricacies: Evidence from Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 174-181.
    9. Hong, Bingyuan & Cui, Xuemeng & Wang, Bohong & Fan, Di & Li, Xiaoping & Gong, Jing, 2022. "Long-term dynamic allocation and maintenance planning of modular equipment to enhance gas field production flexibility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    10. Hong, Bingyuan & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Shangfei & Chen, Shilin & Zhao, Changlong & Gong, Jing, 2020. "Optimal planning and modular infrastructure dynamic allocation for shale gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    11. Misyura, S. Ya & Morozov, V.S. & Nagibin, P.S. & Podgornaya, E.R. & Shlegel, N.E. & Strizhak, P.A., 2025. "The effect of powder aggregates, carbon nanotubes and surfactants on the kinetics of synthesis and dissociation of gas hydrates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    12. Cruz, Matheus de Andrade & Brigagão, George Victor & de Medeiros, José Luiz & Musse, Ana Paula Santana & Kami, Eduardo & Freire, Ronaldo Lucas Alkmin & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes, 2023. "Decarbonization of energy supply to offshore oil & gas production with post-combustion capture: A simulation-based techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    13. Tan, Siah Hong & Barton, Paul I., 2016. "Optimal dynamic allocation of mobile plants to monetize associated or stranded natural gas, part II: Dealing with uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 461-467.
    14. Khan, Mohd Shariq & Lee, Moonyong, 2013. "Design optimization of single mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process using the particle swarm paradigm with nonlinear constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 146-155.
    15. Davor Dujak, 2017. "Mapping Of Natural Gas Supply Chains: Literature Review," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 17, pages 293-309.
    16. Khalilpour, Rajab, 2014. "Multi-level investment planning and scheduling under electricity and carbon market dynamics: Retrofit of a power plant with PCC (post-combustion carbon capture) processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 172-186.
    17. Crow, Daniel J.G. & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2018. "A dynamic model of global natural gas supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 452-469.
    18. Wen, Kai & Lu, Yangfan & Lu, Meitong & Zhang, Wenwei & Zhu, Ming & Qiao, Dan & Meng, Fanpeng & Zhang, Jing & Gong, Jing & Hong, Bingyuan, 2022. "Multi-period optimal infrastructure planning of natural gas pipeline network system integrating flowrate allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    19. Guo, Yingjian & Hawkes, Adam, 2019. "Asset stranding in natural gas export facilities: An agent-based simulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 132-155.
    20. Lawal, Mohammed S. & Fairweather, Michael & Gogolek, Peter & Ingham, Derek B. & Ma, Lin & Pourkashanian, Mohamed & Williams, Alan, 2013. "CFD predictions of wake-stabilised jet flames in a cross-flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 259-269.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:320:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225008989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.