IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v295y2024ics0360544224008752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parameters analysis and techno-economic comparison of various ORCs and sCO2 cycles as the power cycle of Lead–Bismuth molten nuclear micro-reactor

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Shijie
  • Li, Liushuai
  • Huo, Erguang
  • Yu, Yujie
  • Huang, Rui
  • Wang, Shukun

Abstract

Organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and supercritical CO2 (sCO2) Brayton cycle are two key and competition technology routes as the power cycle of Lead–Bismuth micro-reactor (LBMR). However, few studies focus on the comparison of thermodynamic and economic performance between ORCs and sCO2 cycles in nuclear micro-reactor. The objectives in this study are to perform parameters analysis and techno-economic comparison in ORCs and sCO2 cycles with various configurations as the power cycle of LBMR, so as to provide the technical support for the selection of power cycle and its operating conditions in different scenarios. Several high/low-temperature working fluids are screened for ORCs in view to achieve high net efficiency (ηth) and low electricity production cost (EPC). Multi-objective optimization is performed to solve the trade-off between ηth and EPC, and then to compare the comprehensive performance of various cycles from thermodynamic, compact and economic aspects. Results show that, the ηth and EPC of ORCs are comparable or superior to that in sCO2 cycles when the two cycles have similar structures (simple/regenerative). Among the ORCs, the cascade ORC with two-side regeneration using N-Dodecane/Pentane as working fluid pair has the best performance. In all cycles, recompression sCO2 cycle performs best, but only when the heat source temperature is higher than 460 °C, the performance of the recompression sCO2 cycle are overall better than the cascade ORC.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Shijie & Li, Liushuai & Huo, Erguang & Yu, Yujie & Huang, Rui & Wang, Shukun, 2024. "Parameters analysis and techno-economic comparison of various ORCs and sCO2 cycles as the power cycle of Lead–Bismuth molten nuclear micro-reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:295:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224008752
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224008752
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:295:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224008752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.