IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v92y2018icp95-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of modified Organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) for internal combustion engine waste heat recovery (ICE-WHR)

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Lingfeng
  • Shu, Gequn
  • Tian, Hua
  • Deng, Shuai

Abstract

Organic Rankine cycle (ORC) is considered as a rational solution to convert thermal energy of low and moderate temperature heat sources into mechanical work, which currently attracts more and more attention as an effective way for internal combustion engine waste heat recovery (ICE-WHR). Traditional design methods for low-temperature ORCs do not adapt to ICE-WHR suitably due to the specific large-gradient temperature drop characteristics of engine waste heats, and corresponding low-temperature organic fluids meeting with thermal matching and thermal decomposition issues for high-temperature exhaust gas recovery. Hence, there have been a great amount of studies focusing on modified ORCs to achieve a better performance from the aspects of cycle and fluid during the past decade, mainly in 2010s. In this paper, relevant researches of these modified ORCs were reviewed and divided into four parts to approach the ideal cycle, which was defined as the best matching cycle to engine waste heats. From paths of fluid and cycle, high-temperature ORCs (HT-ORCs), mixture ORCs (M-ORCs), ORCs combining with extra loops and dual loop ORCs (DORCs) were summarized. The method of temperature-entropy (t-s) map was applied to provide the approaching degree from modified ORCs to the ideal cycle. The study provides valuable information for stakeholders interested in ORC technologies and gives policymakers perspectives regarding different ORC options for ICE-WHR.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Deng, Shuai, 2018. "A review of modified Organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) for internal combustion engine waste heat recovery (ICE-WHR)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 95-110.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:95-110
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118302338
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:95-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.