IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v295y2024ics0360544224007412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting the volatility of crude oil basis: Univariate models versus multivariate models

Author

Listed:
  • Geng, Qianjie
  • Wang, Yudong

Abstract

The studies on investigating and forecasting crude oil volatility primarily focus on oil price volatility. This research aims to forecast the volatility of the oil futures basis using generalized auto regressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) and its extended models. Specifically, this study compares the forecasting performance of nine econometric models, including two univariate and seven multivariate models. The empirical results show that simple univariate models outperform the multivariate models in forecasting basis volatility, as indicated by the model confidence set (MCS). Moreover, from an economic perspective, the empirical results also demonstrate that the univariate models generate higher Sharpe ratios than the multivariate ones, consistent with the statistical evaluation results on forecasting accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Geng, Qianjie & Wang, Yudong, 2024. "Forecasting the volatility of crude oil basis: Univariate models versus multivariate models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:295:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224007412
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224007412
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:295:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224007412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.