IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v273y2023ics0360544223006163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emission reduction path for coal-based enterprises via carbon capture, geological utilization, and storage: China energy group

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Shengnan
  • Wei, Ning
  • Jiang, Dalin
  • Nie, Ligong
  • Cai, Bin
  • Tao, Yi
  • Li, Xiaochun

Abstract

The goal of carbon neutrality poses significant challenges and opportunities to traditional coal production, processing, and utilization enterprises. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a critical option to reduce carbon emissions for coal-based enterprises. Based on enterprise data and geological data, this study quantitatively evaluates the techno-economic feature and potential of CCUS in China Energy Group using systematical source-sink matching and carbon reduction contribution methods. With the current technical level and only considering the scenario of CO2-enhanced water recovery (CO2-EWR), an enterprise using CCUS to reduce CO2 is feasible. About 73% of the installed capacity of the enterprise is suitable for CCUS, and the cumulative CO2 emission reduction is more significant than 580 Mt/a with 135 g/kWh of the final CO2 emission intensity. Additionally, the emission reduction contribution of CCUS is predicted to be 10%–29.5% from 2020 to 2060. The cost of full-chain CCUS in the enterprise is controllable. The levelized avoidance cost (LAC) of coal chemical plants with a high concentration of CO2 is less than 23 USD/t, the average LAC of coal-fired power plants is 68.6 USD/t, and the average levelized additional cost of electricity is 52.9 USD/MWh. Taking the local feed-in tariff as a standard, the cost of EWR is more competitive than the cost of wind and solar power generation combined with energy storage technology. Considering technological advances and the CCUS hub, which uses common infrastructure to transport and store CO2, EWR costs for coal-fired power will be drastically reduced. Coal-based enterprises can prioritize deploying low-cost CO2-EWR demonstration projects, research and develop key technologies, and form full-chains integrated systems and the CCUS hub. This study provides a basis for coal-based enterprises to reduce large-scale emissions and develop low-carbon transformation through CCUS technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Shengnan & Wei, Ning & Jiang, Dalin & Nie, Ligong & Cai, Bin & Tao, Yi & Li, Xiaochun, 2023. "Emission reduction path for coal-based enterprises via carbon capture, geological utilization, and storage: China energy group," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:273:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223006163
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223006163
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Lin & Xu, Mao & Fan, Jingli & Liang, Xi & Zhang, Xian & Lv, Haodong & Wang, Dong, 2021. "Financing coal-fired power plant to demonstrate CCS (carbon capture and storage) through an innovative policy incentive in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. McCollum, David L & Ogden, Joan M, 2006. "Techno-Economic Models for Carbon Dioxide Compression, Transport, and Storage & Correlations for Estimating Carbon Dioxide Density and Viscosity," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1zg00532, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Yanbin & Sun, Yanting & Liu, Jiechao & Liu, Chang & Zhang, Feng, 2023. "A data driven robust optimization model for scheduling near-zero carbon emission power plant considering the wind power output uncertainties and electricity-carbon market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Chunhong Liu & Shisong Jiang & Hanfei Zhang & Ziyi Lu & Umberto Desideri, 2024. "China and Italy’s Energy Development Trajectories: Current Landscapes and Future Cooperation Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Verma, Aman & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 556-568.
    2. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    3. Wang, Delu & Gan, Jun & Mao, Jinqi & Chen, Fan & Yu, Lan, 2023. "Forecasting power demand in China with a CNN-LSTM model including multimodal information," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    4. Zheqi Yang & Xuming Dou & Yuqing Jiang & Pengfei Luo & Yu Ding & Baosheng Zhang & Xu Tang, 2022. "Tracking the CO 2 Emissions of China’s Coal Production via Global Supply Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-10, August.
    5. Eric Saffou & Arshad Raza & Raoof Gholami & Ciriako Aci & Jan van Bever Donker & Sofyan Salem & Udo Zimmermann & Mimonitu Opuwari & Leon Croukamp & Walter Romaric Elingou & Tapas Chatterjee & Musa S.D, 2022. "Full‐scale simulation of a nearly depleted gas field in South Africa for carbon utilisation and storage," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(4), pages 486-507, August.
    6. Zhang, Xinyue & Guo, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Xingping, 2023. "Assessing the policy synergy among power, carbon emissions trading and tradable green certificate market mechanisms on strategic GENCOs in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    7. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    8. Shalini Kumari & Sasadhar Bera, 2023. "Developing an emission risk control model in coal‐fired power plants for investigating CO2 reduction strategies for sustainable business development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 842-857, January.
    9. Edward H Owens & Samuel Chapman & Paul Allan, 2010. "The Impact of Carbon Capture and Storage on Coal Resource Depletion," Energy & Environment, , vol. 21(8), pages 925-936, December.
    10. Patange, Omkar S. & Garg, Amit & Jayaswal, Sachin, 2022. "An integrated bottom-up optimization to investigate the role of BECCS in transitioning towards a net-zero energy system: A case study from Gujarat, India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Zhang, Boling & Wang, Qian & Wang, Sixia & Tong, Ruipeng, 2023. "Coal power demand and paths to peak carbon emissions in China: A provincial scenario analysis oriented by CO2-related health co-benefits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Wang, Tao & Yu, Wei & Le Moullec, Yann & Liu, Fei & Xiong, Yili & He, Hui & Lu, Jiahui & Hsu, Emily & Fang, Mengxiang & Luo, Zhongyang, 2017. "Solvent regeneration by novel direct non-aqueous gas stripping process for post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 23-32.
    13. Zeng, Bingxin & Zhu, Lei & Yao, Xing, 2020. "Policy choice for end-of-pipe abatement technology adoption under technological uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 121-130.
    14. Suoton P. Peletiri & Nejat Rahmanian & Iqbal M. Mujtaba, 2018. "CO 2 Pipeline Design: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Shi, Xinjie & Cui, Liu & Huang, Zuhui & Zeng, Pei & Qiu, Tongwei & Fu, Linlin & Jiang, Qiang, 2023. "Impact of internal migration on household energy poverty: Empirical evidence from rural China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    16. Zhang, Xinyue & Guo, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Xingping, 2023. "Bidding modes for renewable energy considering electricity-carbon integrated market mechanism based on multi-agent hybrid game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    17. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    18. Yang, Yu & Liu, Jing & Shen, Weifeng & Li, Jie & Chien, I-Lung, 2018. "High-efficiency utilization of CO2 in the methanol production by a novel parallel-series system combining steam and dry methane reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 820-829.
    19. Yuan, Jia-Hai & Lyon, Thomas P., 2012. "Promoting global CCS RDD&D by stronger U.S.–China collaboration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(9), pages 6746-6769.
    20. Giulia Costa & Alessandra Polettini & Raffaella Pomi & Alessio Stramazzo & Daniela Zingaretti, 2017. "Energetic assessment of CO 2 sequestration through slurry carbonation of steel slag: a factorial study," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 530-541, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:273:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223006163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.