IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v263y2023ipbs0360544222025099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective optimization of energy distribution in steel enterprises considering both exergy efficiency and energy cost

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Zhengbiao
  • He, Dongfeng
  • Zhao, Hongbo

Abstract

In integrated steel works, the core objective of system energy conservation techniques is to improve energy utilization and reduce energy costs. Currently, the research on energy distribution optimization of steel enterprises considers only the energy cost of the system and ignores the energy utilization efficiency. However, energy utilization efficiency and energy cost are equally important indicators. Therefore, in this study, a multi-objective optimization model for energy systems was established, which considered minimizing energy cost of the system and maximizing exergy efficiency as the objective functions. The case results indicate that after the optimization aiming at the minimum energy cost (Scheme A) and the maximum exergy efficiency (Scheme B), the energy cost of the two schemes reduced by 24.96% and 9.60%, respectively, and the exergy efficiency increased by 1.67% and 8.65%, respectively. Although Scheme A can significantly reduce the system energy cost, the increase of exergy efficiency is limited. Scheme B is opposite to Scheme A. However, after adopting multi-objective optimization, compared with previous optimization strategies, the energy cost reduced by 22.81%, the exergy efficiency increased by 7.71%, and the energy cost and exergy efficiency of the system were found to be in a better state.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Zhengbiao & He, Dongfeng & Zhao, Hongbo, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization of energy distribution in steel enterprises considering both exergy efficiency and energy cost," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pb:s0360544222025099
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222025099
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Xiancong & Bai, Hao & Lu, Xin & Shi, Qi & Han, Jiehai, 2015. "A MILP model concerning the optimisation of penalty factors for the short-term distribution of byproduct gases produced in the iron and steel making process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 142-158.
    2. Rocco, M.V. & Colombo, E. & Sciubba, E., 2014. "Advances in exergy analysis: a novel assessment of the Extended Exergy Accounting method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1405-1420.
    3. Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2018. "Recent developments and trends in optimization of energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1011-1020.
    4. He, Kun & Wang, Li, 2017. "A review of energy use and energy-efficient technologies for the iron and steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1022-1039.
    5. Na, Hongming & Sun, Jingchao & Qiu, Ziyang & He, Jianfei & Yuan, Yuxing & Yan, Tianyi & Du, Tao, 2021. "A novel evaluation method for energy efficiency of process industry — A case study of typical iron and steel manufacturing process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Song, Dan & Lin, Ling & Wu, Ye, 2019. "Extended exergy accounting for a typical cement industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 678-686.
    7. Hassan, Anas M. & Ayoub, M. & Eissa, M. & Musa, T. & Bruining, Hans & Farajzadeh, R., 2019. "Exergy return on exergy investment analysis of natural-polymer (Guar-Arabic gum) enhanced oil recovery process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 162-172.
    8. Luo, Xianglong & Hu, Jiahao & Zhao, Jun & Zhang, Bingjian & Chen, Ying & Mo, Songping, 2014. "Multi-objective optimization for the design and synthesis of utility systems with emission abatement technology concerns," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1110-1131.
    9. Zhang, Qi & Gao, Jintong & Wang, Yujie & Wang, Lin & Yu, Zaihai & Song, Dayong, 2019. "Exergy-based analysis combined with LCA for waste heat recovery in coal-fired CHP plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 247-262.
    10. Jiang, Sheng-Long & Peng, Gongzhuang & Bogle, I. David L. & Zheng, Zhong, 2022. "Two-stage robust optimization approach for flexible oxygen distribution under uncertainty in integrated iron and steel plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Peng & Hongjun Wu & Wenlong Cao & Qianjun Mao, 2023. "Exergy Analysis of a Shell and Tube Energy Storage Unit with Different Inclination Angles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hanxin & Sun, Wenqiang & Li, Weidong & Ma, Guangyu, 2022. "A carbon flow tracing and carbon accounting method for exploring CO2 emissions of the iron and steel industry: An integrated material–energy–carbon hub," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    2. Sun, Jingchao & Na, Hongming & Yan, Tianyi & Qiu, Ziyang & Yuan, Yuxing & He, Jianfei & Li, Yingnan & Wang, Yisong & Du, Tao, 2021. "A comprehensive assessment on material, exergy and emission networks for the integrated iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Jiang, Sheng-Long & Wang, Meihong & Bogle, I. David L., 2023. "Plant-wide byproduct gas distribution under uncertainty in iron and steel industry via quantile forecasting and robust optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    4. Sun, Jingchao & Na, Hongming & Yan, Tianyi & Che, Zichang & Qiu, Ziyang & Yuan, Yuxing & Li, Yingnan & Du, Tao & Song, Yanli & Fang, Xin, 2022. "Cost-benefit assessment of manufacturing system using comprehensive value flow analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    5. Ahmadi, Mohammad Mahdi & Keyhani, Alireza & Rosen, Marc A. & Lam, Su Shiung & Pan, Junting & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza, 2022. "Towards sustainable net-zero districts using the extended exergy accounting concept," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 747-764.
    6. Marcin Sajdak & Roksana Muzyka & Grzegorz Gałko & Ewelina Ksepko & Monika Zajemska & Szymon Sobek & Dariusz Tercki, 2022. "Actual Trends in the Usability of Biochar as a High-Value Product of Biomass Obtained through Pyrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-30, December.
    7. Llera, Rocio & Vigil, Miguel & Díaz-Díaz, Sara & Martínez Huerta, Gemma Marta, 2022. "Prospective environmental and techno-economic assessment of steam production by means of heat pipes in the steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    8. Shuangping Wu & Anjun Xu, 2021. "Calculation Method of Energy Saving in Process Engineering: A Case Study of Iron and Steel Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Xi, Han & Wu, Xiao & Chen, Xianhao & Sha, Peng, 2021. "Artificial intelligent based energy scheduling of steel mill gas utilization system towards carbon neutrality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    10. da Silva Neves, Marcus Vinicius & Szklo, Alexandre & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2023. "Fossil fuel facilities exergy return for a frontier of analysis incorporating CO2 capture: The case of a coal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    11. Alfonso Biondi & Enrico Sciubba, 2021. "Extended Exergy Analysis (EEA) of Italy, 2013–2017," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Pavelka, Michal & Klika, Václav & Vágner, Petr & Maršík, František, 2015. "Generalization of exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 158-172.
    13. Che, Gelegen & Zhang, Yanyan & Tang, Lixin & Zhao, Shengnan, 2023. "A deep reinforcement learning based multi-objective optimization for the scheduling of oxygen production system in integrated iron and steel plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    14. Al-Falahi, Monaaf D.A. & Jayasinghe, Shantha D.G. & Enshaei, Hossein, 2019. "Hybrid algorithm for optimal operation of hybrid energy systems in electric ferries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    15. Yuancheng Lin & Honghua Yang & Linwei Ma & Zheng Li & Weidou Ni, 2021. "Low-Carbon Development for the Iron and Steel Industry in China and the World: Status Quo, Future Vision, and Key Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-28, November.
    16. Colombo, Emanuela & Rocco, Matteo V. & Toro, Claudia & Sciubba, Enrico, 2015. "An exergy-based approach to the joint economic and environmental impact assessment of possible photovoltaic scenarios: A case study at a regional level in Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 64-74.
    17. Volkova, Anna & Krupenski, Igor & Ledvanov, Aleksandr & Hlebnikov, Aleksandr & Lepiksaar, Kertu & Latõšov, Eduard & Mašatin, Vladislav, 2020. "Energy cascade connection of a low-temperature district heating network to the return line of a high-temperature district heating network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    18. Fábio de Oliveira Neves & Henrique Ewbank & José Arnaldo Frutuoso Roveda & Andrea Trianni & Fernando Pinhabel Marafão & Sandra Regina Monteiro Masalskiene Roveda, 2022. "Economic and Production-Related Implications for Industrial Energy Efficiency: A Logistic Regression Analysis on Cross-Cutting Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Serrenho, André Cabrera & Warr, Benjamin & Sousa, Tânia & Ayres, Robert U. & Domingos, Tiago, 2016. "Structure and dynamics of useful work along the agriculture-industry-services transition: Portugal from 1856 to 2009," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pb:s0360544222025099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.