IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v249y2022ics0360544222006338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fusion DEMO sCO2 layout design with battery farm

Author

Listed:
  • Syblík, Jan
  • Entler, Slavomír
  • Veselý, Ladislav
  • Štěpánek, Jan
  • Dostál, Václav

Abstract

Nuclear fusion is a promising low-carbon and low-emission source of energy. One of the first fusion power plants will be the European Union's demonstration fusion power plant DEMO. Among the key attributes that influence the whole DEMO design is the fusion reactor pulse operation. Due to the power fluctuations of the power source, there will be a significant impact on the power plant technology, turbine, etc. Therefore, a power conversion system based on a supercritical CO2 capable of operating in two nominal power levels is proposed. The system operates in nominal parameters during the entire power cycle without the need for thermal power pulses balancing. Unlike other designs, instead of connecting the energy storage system directly to the heat transfer system, this article proposes a layout with an energy storage system behind the generator. Power pulses are balanced using a battery farm, compensating the fluctuations in the gross power and power plant self-consumption. Power conversion system is based on a sCO2 Brayton simple cycle with regeneration and includes technology for nominal operation at two levels of thermal power. Optimization of the proposed layout shows thermodynamic net efficiency of 24 %.

Suggested Citation

  • Syblík, Jan & Entler, Slavomír & Veselý, Ladislav & Štěpánek, Jan & Dostál, Václav, 2022. "Fusion DEMO sCO2 layout design with battery farm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:249:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222006338
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222006338
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guelpa, Elisa & Verda, Vittorio, 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis for the design improvement of supercritical CO2 cycle in concentrated solar plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Entler, Slavomir & Horacek, Jan & Dlouhy, Tomas & Dostal, Vaclav, 2018. "Approximation of the economy of fusion energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 489-497.
    4. Linares, José Ignacio & Cantizano, Alexis & Arenas, Eva & Moratilla, Beatriz Yolanda & Martín-Palacios, Víctor & Batet, Lluis, 2017. "Recuperated versus single-recuperator re-compressed supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycles for DEMO fusion reactor based on dual coolant lithium lead blanket," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 307-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aofang Yu & Wen Su & Li Zhao & Xinxing Lin & Naijun Zhou, 2020. "New Knowledge on the Performance of Supercritical Brayton Cycle with CO 2 -Based Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Kravanja, Gregor & Zajc, Gašper & Knez, Željko & Škerget, Mojca & Marčič, Simon & Knez, Maša H., 2018. "Heat transfer performance of CO2, ethane and their azeotropic mixture under supercritical conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 190-201.
    3. Čábelková, Inna & Strielkowski, Wadim & Streimikiene, Dalia & Cavallaro, Fausto & Streimikis, Justas, 2021. "The social acceptance of nuclear fusion for decision making towards carbon free circular economy: Evidence from Czech Republic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Manzoni, Matteo & Patti, Alberto & Maccarini, Simone & Traverso, Alberto, 2022. "Analysis and comparison of innovative large scale thermo-mechanical closed cycle energy storages," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Fernández-Torrijos, M. & González-Gómez, P.A. & Sobrino, C. & Santana, D., 2021. "Economic and thermo-mechanical design of tubular sCO2 central-receivers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1087-1101.
    6. Banacloche, Santacruz & Gamarra, Ana R. & Lechon, Yolanda & Bustreo, Chiara, 2020. "Socioeconomic and environmental impacts of bringing the sun to earth: A sustainability analysis of a fusion power plant deployment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    7. Marco Bicchi & Michele Marconcini & Ernani Fulvio Bellobuono & Elisabetta Belardini & Lorenzo Toni & Andrea Arnone, 2023. "Multi-Point Surrogate-Based Approach for Assessing Impacts of Geometric Variations on Centrifugal Compressor Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    9. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Liu, Peng & Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Optimization of CO2 Transcritical Power Cycle (CTPC) for engine waste heat recovery based on split concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Tong, Yongjing & Duan, Liqiang & Yang, Ming & Pang, Liping, 2022. "Design optimization of a new supercritical CO2 single reheat coal-fired power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    11. Xia, Jiaxi & Wang, Jiangfeng & Lou, Juwei & Hu, Jianjun & Yao, Sen, 2023. "Thermodynamic, economic, environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel combined cooling and power system for cascade utilization of engine waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    12. Zaharil, Hafiz Aman, 2021. "An investigation on the usage of different supercritical fluids in parabolic trough solar collector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 676-691.
    13. Qin, Lei & Xie, Gongnan & Ma, Yuan & Li, Shulei, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a waste heat recovery system with a combined supercritical/transcritical CO2 cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    14. Rafał Kowalski & Szymon Kuczyński & Mariusz Łaciak & Adam Szurlej & Tomasz Włodek, 2020. "A Case Study of the Supercritical CO 2 -Brayton Cycle at a Natural Gas Compression Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Andrés Meana-Fernández & Juan M. González-Caballín & Roberto Martínez-Pérez & Francisco J. Rubio-Serrano & Antonio J. Gutiérrez-Trashorras, 2022. "Power Plant Cycles: Evolution towards More Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Son, Seongmin & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2018. "Application of adjoint sensitivity analysis method to supercritical CO2 power cycle optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1153-1164.
    17. Yang, Yiping & Huang, Yulei & Jiang, Peixue & Zhu, Yinhai, 2020. "Multi-objective optimization of combined cooling, heating, and power systems with supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    18. Ma, Xiaofeng & Jiang, Peixue & Zhu, Yinhai, 2022. "Dynamic simulation model with virtual interfaces of supercritical working fluid heat exchanger based on moving boundary method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    19. Lindley, Ben & Roulstone, Tony & Locatelli, Giorgio & Rooney, Matt, 2023. "Can fusion energy be cost-competitive and commercially viable? An analysis of magnetically confined reactors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    20. Alharbi, Sattam & Elsayed, Mohamed L. & Chow, Louis C., 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of an integrated system of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle and multi-effect desalination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:249:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222006338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.