IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v244y2022ipbs0360544222000664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal design of non-isothermal supercritical water gasification reactor: From biomass to hydrogen

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Jialing
  • Rong, Siqi
  • Sun, Jingli
  • Peng, Zhiyong
  • Jin, Hui
  • Guo, Liejin
  • Zhang, Xiang
  • Zhou, Teng

Abstract

Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of biomass is a promising technology for large-scale hydrogen production and its success is greatly affected by the performance of SCWG reactor. In this work, a novel mathematical modeling and optimization approach is applied to design optimal tubular reactor for the SCWG of biomass. The tubular reactor is first discretized into cells. Then, detailed mathematical models are developed to represent the reactions occurring in each cell and the mass balances among the cells. By integrating all the models along the reactor, the reactor design problem is formulated as a nonlinear optimization problem. The objective is to maximize the hydrogen yield and multiple constraints have to be fulfilled. After solving the problem, the optimal reactor design (e.g., reactor length, diameter, and axial fluid temperature profile) can be obtained. To demonstrate the applicability of our approach, two design scenarios are studied. The results show that non-isothermal reactors with three-stage zigzag-like temperature profiles are preferred for hydrogen production, instead of traditional isothermal reactors. Compared with isothermal reactors, the optimal non-isothermal ones can increase hydrogen yield up to 25.06% (i.e., 16.67 vs 13.33 mol/kg glycerol). The results provide useful insights on industrial SCWG reactor design for achieving efficient hydrogen production.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Jialing & Rong, Siqi & Sun, Jingli & Peng, Zhiyong & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin & Zhang, Xiang & Zhou, Teng, 2022. "Optimal design of non-isothermal supercritical water gasification reactor: From biomass to hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:244:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544222000664
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222000664
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hrnčič, Maša Knez & Kravanja, Gregor & Knez, Željko, 2016. "Hydrothermal treatment of biomass for energy and chemicals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P2), pages 1312-1322.
    2. Gutiérrez Ortiz, F.J. & Serrera, A. & Galera, S. & Ollero, P., 2013. "Experimental study of the supercritical water reforming of glycerol without the addition of a catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 193-206.
    3. Wang, Cui & Li, Linfeng & Chen, Yunan & Ge, Zhiwei & Jin, Hui, 2021. "Supercritical water gasification of wheat straw: Composition of reaction products and kinetic study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    4. Kuo, Po-Chih & Illathukandy, Biju & Wu, Wei & Chang, Jo-Shu, 2021. "Energy, exergy, and environmental analyses of renewable hydrogen production through plasma gasification of microalgal biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    5. Gutiérrez Ortiz, F.J. & Campanario, F.J. & Aguilera, P.G. & Ollero, P., 2015. "Hydrogen production from supercritical water reforming of glycerol over Ni/Al2O3–SiO2 catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 634-642.
    6. Li, Guoxuan & Wang, Shuai & Zhao, Jiangang & Qi, Huaqing & Ma, Zhaoyuan & Cui, Peizhe & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Gao, Jun & Wang, Yinglong, 2020. "Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen production with methane tri-reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. Chen, Zhewen & Zhang, Xiaosong & Han, Wei & Gao, Lin & Li, Sheng, 2018. "A power generation system with integrated supercritical water gasification of coal and CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 723-730.
    8. Chen, Yunan & Yi, Lei & Wei, Wenwen & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin, 2022. "Hydrogen production by sewage sludge gasification in supercritical water with high heating rate batch reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    9. Macrì, Domenico & Catizzone, Enrico & Molino, Antonio & Migliori, Massimo, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of biomass and agro-food residues: Energy assessment from modelling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 624-636.
    10. Knez, Ž. & Markočič, E. & Leitgeb, M. & Primožič, M. & Knez Hrnčič, M. & Škerget, M., 2014. "Industrial applications of supercritical fluids: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 235-243.
    11. Liu, Jia & Hu, Nan & Fan, Li-Wu, 2022. "Optimal design and thermodynamic analysis on the hydrogen oxidation reactor in a combined hydrogen production and power generation system based on coal gasification in supercritical water," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    12. Hu, Yulin & Gong, Mengyue & Xing, Xuelian & Wang, Haoyu & Zeng, Yimin & Xu, Chunbao Charles, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of biomass model compounds: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    13. Chen, Zhewen & Gao, Lin & Zhang, Xiaosong & Han, Wei & Li, Sheng, 2018. "High-efficiency power generation system with integrated supercritical water gasification of coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 810-816.
    14. Cao, Changqing & Guo, Liejin & Jin, Hui & Cao, Wen & Jia, Yi & Yao, Xiangdong, 2017. "System analysis of pulping process coupled with supercritical water gasification of black liquor for combined hydrogen, heat and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 238-247.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verma, Shivpal & Dregulo, Andrei Mikhailovich & Kumar, Vinay & Bhargava, Preeti Chaturvedi & Khan, Nawaz & Singh, Anuradha & Sun, Xinwei & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Zhang, Zengqiang &, 2023. "Reaction engineering during biomass gasification and conversion to energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Peng, Zhiyong & Xu, Jialing & Rong, Siqi & Luo, Kui & Lu, Libo & Jin, Hui & Zhao, Qiuyang & Guo, Liejin, 2023. "Thermodynamic and environmental analysis for multi-component supercritical thermal fluid generation by supercritical water gasification of oilfield wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Liu, Chenglin & Zhao, Lei & Zhu, Shun & Shen, Yuefeng & Yu, Jianhua & Yang, Qingchun, 2023. "Advanced exergy analysis and optimization of a coal to ethylene glycol (CtEG) process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Junhao & Sun, Shichang & Cui, Chongwei & Ma, Rui & Fang, Lin & Zhang, Peixin & Quan, Zonggang & Song, Xin & Yan, Jianglong & Luo, Juan, 2019. "Hydrogen-rich bio-gas generation and optimization in relation to heavy metals immobilization during Pd-catalyzed supercritical water gasification of sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Guo, Shenghui & Meng, Fanrui & Peng, Pai & Xu, Jialing & Jin, Hui & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of the superiority of the direct mass transfer design in the supercritical water gasification system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    3. Liu, Shanke & Yang, Yan & Yu, Lijun & Cao, Yu & Liu, Xinyi & Yao, Anqi & Cao, Yaping, 2023. "Self-heating optimization of integrated system of supercritical water gasification of biomass for power generation using artificial neural network combined with process simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    4. Benim, Ali Cemal & Pfeiffelmann, Björn & Ocłoń, Paweł & Taler, Jan, 2019. "Computational investigation of a lifted hydrogen flame with LES and FGM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1172-1181.
    5. Kravanja, Gregor & Zajc, Gašper & Knez, Željko & Škerget, Mojca & Marčič, Simon & Knez, Maša H., 2018. "Heat transfer performance of CO2, ethane and their azeotropic mixture under supercritical conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 190-201.
    6. Xue, Xiaodong & Liu, Changchun & Han, Wei & Wang, Zefeng & Zhang, Na & Jin, Hongguang & Wang, Xiaodong, 2023. "Proposal and investigation of a high-efficiency coal-fired power generation system enabled by chemical recuperative supercritical water coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    7. Su, Hongcai & Yan, Mi & Wang, Shurong, 2022. "Recent advances in supercritical water gasification of biowaste catalyzed by transition metal-based catalysts for hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Gomes, J.G. & Mitoura, J. & Guirardello, R., 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis for hydrogen production from the reaction of subcritical and supercritical gasification of the C. Vulgaris microalgae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Cheng, Shulei & Wu, Yinyin & Chen, Hua & Chen, Jiandong & Song, Malin & Hou, Wenxuan, 2019. "Determinants of changes in electricity generation intensity among different power sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 389-408.
    10. Qi, Xingang & Li, Xujun & Liu, Fan & Lu, Libo & Jin, Hui & Wei, Wenwen & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2023. "Hydrogen production by kraft black liquor supercritical water gasification: Reaction pathway and kinetic," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    11. Lu, Junhui & Cao, Haishan & Li, JunMing, 2020. "Energy and cost estimates for separating and capturing CO2 from CO2/H2O using condensation coupled with pressure/vacuum swing adsorption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    12. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hidayat, Arif & Hossain, Mohammad M. & Muraza, Oki, 2021. "Transformation of low-rank coal to clean syngas and power via thermochemical route," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    13. Mohsin Raza & Abrar Inayat & Basim Abu-Jdayil, 2021. "Crude Glycerol as a Potential Feedstock for Future Energy via Thermochemical Conversion Processes: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    14. Fózer, Dániel & Volanti, Mirco & Passarini, Fabrizio & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Mizsey, Péter, 2020. "Bioenergy with carbon emissions capture and utilisation towards GHG neutrality: Power-to-Gas storage via hydrothermal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    15. Ramin Azargohar & Sonil Nanda & He Cheng & Ajay K. Dalai, 2022. "Potential Application of Canola Hull Fuel Pellets for the Production of Synthesis Gas and Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Liu, Jia & Hu, Nan & Fan, Li-Wu, 2022. "Optimal design and thermodynamic analysis on the hydrogen oxidation reactor in a combined hydrogen production and power generation system based on coal gasification in supercritical water," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    17. Schwengber, Carine Aline & Alves, Helton José & Schaffner, Rodolfo Andrade & da Silva, Fernando Alves & Sequinel, Rodrigo & Bach, Vanessa Rossato & Ferracin, Ricardo José, 2016. "Overview of glycerol reforming for hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 259-266.
    18. Wang, Yanhong & Cao, Lihua & Li, Xingcan & Wang, Jiaxing & Hu, Pengfei & Li, Bo & Li, Yong, 2020. "A novel thermodynamic method and insight of heat transfer characteristics on economizer for supercritical thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Gutiérrez Ortiz, F.J. & Campanario, F.J. & Aguilera, P.G. & Ollero, P., 2016. "Supercritical water reforming of glycerol: Performance of Ru and Ni catalysts on Al2O3 support," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 561-568.
    20. Setyawan, Hendrix Y. & Zhu, Mingming & Zhang, Zhezi & Zhang, Dongke, 2016. "Ignition and combustion characteristics of single droplets of a crude glycerol in comparison with pure glycerol, petroleum diesel, biodiesel and ethanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 153-159.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:244:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544222000664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.