IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v222y2021ics0360544221002024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vacuum promoted methane decomposition for hydrogen production with carbon separation: Parameter optimization and economic assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Zong
  • Zhang, Rongjun
  • Xia, Guofu
  • Wu, Yu
  • Li, Hongwei
  • Sun, Zhao
  • Sun, Zhiqiang

Abstract

Catalytic methane decomposition (CMD) is a promising method for directly extracting hydrogen from methane. Nevertheless, relatively low methane conversion and carbon deposition on the catalyst are two main shortcomings to be resolved. A new process, vacuum promoted methane decomposition with carbon separation (VPMDCS), is proposed and simulated by Aspen Plus. The VPMDCS system is comprised of two reactors, a methane decomposition reactor (MDR) and a carbon separation reactor (CSR), which continuously generates hydrogen in the MDR and converts carbon into CO basically in the CSR based on Le Chatelier’s principle. The effects of methane decomposition temperature and pressure, gasifying agent concentration, CO2/C molar ratio, carbon separation temperature and pressure were comprehensively investigated and optimized. Besides, an economic analysis was conducted compared with that of steam methane reforming, evaluating the competitiveness of VPMDCS. Results reveal that VPMDCS can produce high-purity H2 and CO in the MDR and CSR, respectively, obtaining CH4 conversion of 99.18%, and H2 and CO concentrations of both 99.59 vol%. Economic analysis indicates that the cost to produce hydrogen in the VPMDCS process is 5.40 €/kg, which is somewhat competitive compared to hydrogen produced by small-scale SRM (4.55 €/kg).

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Zong & Zhang, Rongjun & Xia, Guofu & Wu, Yu & Li, Hongwei & Sun, Zhao & Sun, Zhiqiang, 2021. "Vacuum promoted methane decomposition for hydrogen production with carbon separation: Parameter optimization and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:222:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221002024
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221002024
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luo, Ming & Yi, Yang & Wang, Shuzhong & Wang, Zhuliang & Du, Min & Pan, Jianfeng & Wang, Qian, 2018. "Review of hydrogen production using chemical-looping technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3186-3214.
    2. Keipi, Tiina & Li, Tian & Løvås, Terese & Tolvanen, Henrik & Konttinen, Jukka, 2017. "Methane thermal decomposition in regenerative heat exchanger reactor: Experimental and modeling study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 823-832.
    3. Cai, Lei & He, Tianzhi & Xiang, Yanlei & Guan, Yanwen, 2020. "Study on the reaction pathways of steam methane reforming for H2 production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    4. Zhang, Xiang & Kätelhön, Arne & Sorda, Giovanni & Helmin, Marta & Rose, Marcus & Bardow, André & Madlener, Reinhard & Palkovits, Regina & Mitsos, Alexander, 2018. "CO2 mitigation costs of catalytic methane decomposition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 826-838.
    5. Yamani, Noureddine & Khellaf, Abdallah & Mohammedi, Kamal & Behar, Omar, 2017. "Assessment of solar thermal tower technology under Algerian climate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 444-460.
    6. Martínez, I. & Romano, M.C. & Fernández, J.R. & Chiesa, P. & Murillo, R. & Abanades, J.C., 2014. "Process design of a hydrogen production plant from natural gas with CO2 capture based on a novel Ca/Cu chemical loop," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 192-208.
    7. Boyano, A. & Blanco-Marigorta, A.M. & Morosuk, T. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2011. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2202-2214.
    8. Lee, Boreum & Kim, Hyunwoo & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Won, Wangyun & Lim, Hankwon, 2020. "Technical and economic feasibility under uncertainty for methane dry reforming of coke oven gas as simultaneous H2 production and CO2 utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Abánades, A. & Rubbia, C. & Salmieri, D., 2012. "Technological challenges for industrial development of hydrogen production based on methane cracking," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 359-363.
    10. Sun, Zhao & Russell, Christopher K. & Fan, Maohong, 2021. "Effect of calcium ferrites on carbon dioxide gasification reactivity and kinetics of pine wood derived char," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 445-452.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seunghyun Cheon & Manhee Byun & Dongjun Lim & Hyunjun Lee & Hankwon Lim, 2021. "Parametric Study for Thermal and Catalytic Methane Pyrolysis for Hydrogen Production: Techno-Economic and Scenario Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seunghyun Cheon & Manhee Byun & Dongjun Lim & Hyunjun Lee & Hankwon Lim, 2021. "Parametric Study for Thermal and Catalytic Methane Pyrolysis for Hydrogen Production: Techno-Economic and Scenario Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Qingling & Ji, Na & Kansha, Yasuki & Tsutsumi, Atsushi, 2015. "Optimization of steam methane reforming coupled with pressure swing adsorption hydrogen production process by heat integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 392-401.
    3. Chisalita, Dora-Andreea & Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2019. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production processes based on various natural gas chemical looping systems with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 331-344.
    4. Antzaras, Andy N. & Lemonidou, Angeliki A., 2022. "Recent advances on materials and processes for intensified production of blue hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    5. Msheik, Malek & Rodat, Sylvain & Abanades, Stéphane, 2022. "Experimental comparison of solar methane pyrolysis in gas-phase and molten-tin bubbling tubular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Qin, Changlei & Yin, Junjun & Feng, Bo & Ran, Jingyu & Zhang, Li & Manovic, Vasilije, 2016. "Modelling of the calcination behaviour of a uniformly-distributed CuO/CaCO3 particle in Ca–Cu chemical looping," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 400-410.
    7. Alves, Luís & Pereira, Vítor & Lagarteira, Tiago & Mendes, Adélio, 2021. "Catalytic methane decomposition to boost the energy transition: Scientific and technological advancements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Bermúdez, Vicente & Luján, José Manuel & Piqueras, Pedro & Campos, Daniel, 2014. "Pollutants emission and particle behavior in a pre-turbo aftertreatment light-duty diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 509-522.
    9. Konrad, Kai A. & Lommerud, Kjell Erik, 2021. "Effective climate policy needs non-combustion uses for hydrocarbons," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Gürbüz, Emine Yağız & Güler, Onur Vahip & Keçebaş, Ali, 2022. "Environmental impact assessment of a real geothermal driven power plant with two-stage ORC using enhanced exergo-environmental analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1110-1123.
    11. Fernández, J.R. & Abanades, J.C., 2014. "Conceptual design of a Ni-based chemical looping combustion process using fixed-beds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-319.
    12. Yousef, Samy & Eimontas, Justas & Striūgas, Nerijus & Abdelnaby, Mohammed Ali, 2022. "Gasification kinetics of char derived from metallised food packaging plastics waste pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    13. Balli, Ozgur & Kale, Utku & Rohács, Dániel & Hikmet Karakoc, T., 2022. "Environmental damage cost and exergoenvironmental evaluations of piston prop aviation engines for the landing and take-off flight phases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    14. Burak Atakan, 2019. "Compression–Expansion Processes for Chemical Energy Storage: Thermodynamic Optimization for Methane, Ethane and Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Wang, Xun & Fu, Genshen & Xiao, Bo & Xu, Tingting, 2022. "Optimization of nickel-iron bimetallic oxides for coproduction of hydrogen and syngas in chemical looping reforming with water splitting process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    17. Nhuchhen, Daya R. & Sit, Song P. & Layzell, David B., 2022. "Towards net-zero emission cement and power production using Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    18. Amani, Madjid & Ghenaiet, Adel, 2020. "Novel hybridization of solar central receiver system with combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    19. Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M. & Masi, Marco & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2014. "Exergo-environmental analysis of a reverse osmosis desalination plant in Gran Canaria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 223-232.
    20. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:222:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221002024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.