IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v158y2018icp820-829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High-efficiency utilization of CO2 in the methanol production by a novel parallel-series system combining steam and dry methane reforming

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Yu
  • Liu, Jing
  • Shen, Weifeng
  • Li, Jie
  • Chien, I-Lung

Abstract

Global warming caused by the accumulation of atmospheric CO2 has received widespread attention in recent years. The direct CO2 integration process in NG-based methanol (MeOH) synthesis plant is one of the predominant CO2 utilization technologies. However, a large amount of water produced in the MeOH reactor increasing the difficulty in the subsequent purification system and the high direct CO2 emissions are caused by the low CO2 conversion rate. In view of such issues, we propose an innovative MeOH production approach based on a parallel-series system combining steam methane reforming (SMR) and dry methane reforming (DMR) to achieve a high-efficiency utilization of CO2. In this approach, the CO2 from SMR and that from additional feeding are converted into CO with a proper amount in the DMR reformer, and thus the content of CO2 in the make-up gas becomes more appropriate than that of existing processes, and the conversion rate of CO2 to MeOH could be obviously increased, what is more, the corresponding direct emissions of CO2 could be significantly reduced. On the other hand, the carbon efficiency is introduced to evaluate the conversion efficiency of all raw material (i.e., CH4 and CO2) containing the carbon atoms. The comparative evaluations are carried out using Aspen Plus V8.4® and the proposed improved process is demonstrated to be more efficient than existing ones from views of technological, economic, and environmental metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Yu & Liu, Jing & Shen, Weifeng & Li, Jie & Chien, I-Lung, 2018. "High-efficiency utilization of CO2 in the methanol production by a novel parallel-series system combining steam and dry methane reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 820-829.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:158:y:2018:i:c:p:820-829
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218311265
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2017. "Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data of three sectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 772-787.
    2. Pellegrini, Laura A. & Soave, Giorgio & Gamba, Simone & Langè, Stefano, 2011. "Economic analysis of a combined energy–methanol production plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4891-4897.
    3. Lee, Woo-Sung & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Baek, Seung-Won & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2017. "Performance, economic and exergy analyses of carbon capture processes for a 300 MW class integrated gasification combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 731-742.
    4. McCollum, David L & Ogden, Joan M, 2006. "Techno-Economic Models for Carbon Dioxide Compression, Transport, and Storage & Correlations for Estimating Carbon Dioxide Density and Viscosity," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1zg00532, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Wu, Wei & Yang, Hsiao-Tung & Hwang, Jenn-Jiang, 2014. "Conceptual design of syngas production systems with almost net-zero carbon dioxide emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 753-761.
    6. Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Schöneberger, Jan C. & Boulamanti, Aikaterini & Tzimas, Evangelos, 2016. "Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 718-732.
    7. Trop, P. & Anicic, B. & Goricanec, D., 2014. "Production of methanol from a mixture of torrefied biomass and coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 125-132.
    8. Khalilpour, Rajab, 2014. "Multi-level investment planning and scheduling under electricity and carbon market dynamics: Retrofit of a power plant with PCC (post-combustion carbon capture) processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 172-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Pérez Sánchez, Jordán & Aguillón Martínez, Javier Eduardo & Mazur Czerwiec, Zdzislaw & Zavala Guzmán, Alan Martín, 2019. "Theoretical assessment of integration of CCS in the Mexican electrical sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 828-840.
    3. Yao, Ling & Wang, Feng & Wang, Long & Wang, Guoqiang, 2019. "Transport enhancement study on small-scale methanol steam reforming reactor with waste heat recovery for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 986-997.
    4. Kotowicz, Janusz & Węcel, Daniel & Brzęczek, Mateusz, 2021. "Analysis of the work of a “renewable” methanol production installation based ON H2 from electrolysis and CO2 from power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    5. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Techno-economic and climate impact analysis of carbon utilization process for methanol production from blast furnace gas over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Ray, Debjyoti & Nepak, Devadutta & Vinodkumar, T. & Subrahmanyam, Ch., 2019. "g-C3N4 promoted DBD plasma assisted dry reforming of methane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 630-638.
    7. Rosha, Pali & Mohapatra, Saroj Kumar & Mahla, Sunil Kumar & Dhir, Amit, 2019. "Hydrogen enrichment of biogas via dry and autothermal-dry reforming with pure nickel (Ni) nanoparticle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 733-739.
    8. Osat, Mohammad & Shojaati, Faryar & Osat, Mojtaba, 2023. "A solar-biomass system associated with CO2 capture, power generation and waste heat recovery for syngas production from rice straw and microalgae: Technological, energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and env," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    9. Ye, Run-Ping & Gong, Weibo & Sun, Zhao & Sheng, Qingtao & Shi, Xiufeng & Wang, Tongtong & Yao, Yi & Razink, Joshua J. & Lin, Ling & Zhou, Zhangfeng & Adidharma, Hertanto & Tang, Jinke & Fan, Maohong &, 2019. "Enhanced stability of Ni/SiO2 catalyst for CO2 methanation: Derived from nickel phyllosilicate with strong metal-support interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prapatsorn Borisut & Aroonsri Nuchitprasittichai, 2020. "Process Configuration Studies of Methanol Production via Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation: Process Simulation-Based Optimization Using Artificial Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Yifan Wang & Laurence A. Wright, 2021. "A Comparative Review of Alternative Fuels for the Maritime Sector: Economic, Technology, and Policy Challenges for Clean Energy Implementation," World, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Longfei He & Chenglin Hu & Daozhi Zhao & Haili Lu & Xiaoxi Fu & Yiyu Li, 2016. "Carbon emission mitigation through regulatory policies and operations adaptation in supply chains: theoretic developments and extensions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(1), pages 179-207, November.
    5. Kler, Aleksandr M. & Tyurina, Elina A. & Mednikov, Aleksandr S., 2018. "A plant for methanol and electricity production: Technical-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 890-899.
    6. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Patel, Sanjay K.S. & Selvaraj, Chandrabose & Mardina, Primata & Jeong, Jae-Hoon & Kalia, Vipin C. & Kang, Yun Chan & Lee, Jung-Kul, 2016. "Enhancement of methanol production from synthetic gas mixture by Methylosinus sporium through covalent immobilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 383-391.
    8. Li, Wenjia & Hao, Yong & Wang, Hongsheng & Liu, Hao & Sui, Jun, 2017. "Efficient and low-carbon heat and power cogeneration with photovoltaics and thermochemical storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1523-1531.
    9. Verma, Aman & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 556-568.
    10. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    11. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & González-Garay, Andrés & Bernardi, Andrea & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Dowell, Niall Mac & Chachuat, Benoit & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "Electricity grid decarbonisation or green methanol fuel? A life-cycle modelling and analysis of today′s transportation-power nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    12. Li, Shenghui & Sun, Xiaojing & Liu, Linlin & Du, Jian, 2023. "A full process optimization of methanol production integrated with co-generation based on the co-gasification of biomass and coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    13. Zhang, Xi & Geng, Yong & Shao, Shuai & Wilson, Jeffrey & Song, Xiaoqian & You, Wei, 2020. "China’s non-fossil energy development and its 2030 CO2 reduction targets: The role of urbanization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    14. Olimpia Neagu, 2019. "The Link between Economic Complexity and Carbon Emissions in the European Union Countries: A Model Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Sohail Abbas & Shazia Kousar & Amber Pervaiz, 2021. "Effects of energy consumption and ecological footprint on CO2 emissions: an empirical evidence from Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13364-13381, September.
    16. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2017. "Analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in China’s mining industry: Evidence and policy implications," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 77-87.
    17. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    18. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Lizhan Cao & Hui Wang, 2022. "The Slowdown in China’s Energy Consumption Growth in the “New Normal” Stage: From Both National and Regional Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:158:y:2018:i:c:p:820-829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.