IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v135y2017icp182-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical and economic evaluation of a solar thermal MgO electrolysis process for magnesium production

Author

Listed:
  • Korenko, M.
  • Larson, C.
  • Blood, K.
  • Palumbo, R.
  • Nudehi, S.
  • Diver, R.
  • Blood, D.
  • Šimko, F.
  • Venstrom, L.J.

Abstract

We present a techno-economic analysis of a 17,000–18,000 metric tons per year electrolytic process for producing Mg from MgO with and without out a concentrated solar thermal input. The solar thermal input is delivered via power tower technology and the evaporation and condensation of sodium. Energy requirements for the process at scale were based on thermodynamics and an extrapolation of laboratory measurements of the electrochemical kinetic and mass transport parameters via a finite-element numerical model. While technically possible, integrating a solar thermal input does not make economic sense without crediting avoided CO2 emissions. A solar thermal input reduces energy operational costs from $0.654/kg to as low as $ 0.481/kg, but it also lowers the Mg production rate of the electrolytic cells such that more cells are required to achieve production capacity, which, in turn, increases capital and maintenance costs. The net operational savings are negligible. The estimated operational costs to produce Mg are ∼$2.46/kg. At this cost, the process without a solar thermal input is economically tantalizing vis à vis the current commercial processes for producing Mg, and its CO2 emission level is 46% lower than that of the Pidgeon process, currently the predominant method for producing Mg.

Suggested Citation

  • Korenko, M. & Larson, C. & Blood, K. & Palumbo, R. & Nudehi, S. & Diver, R. & Blood, D. & Šimko, F. & Venstrom, L.J., 2017. "Technical and economic evaluation of a solar thermal MgO electrolysis process for magnesium production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 182-194.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:135:y:2017:i:c:p:182-194
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217310393
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Palumbo, R.D. & Fletcher, E.A., 1988. "High temperature solar electrothermal processing—III. Zinc from zinc oxide at 1200–1675K using a non-consumable anode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 319-332.
    2. Fletcher, Edward A. & Macdonald, Frank J. & Kunnerth, Dennis, 1985. "High temperature solar electrothermal processing—II. Zinc from zinc oxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 10(12), pages 1255-1272.
    3. Parks, Donald J. & Scholl, Kent L. & Fletcher, Edward A., 1988. "A study of the use of Y2O3 doped ZrO2 membranes for solar electrothermal and solarthermal separations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 121-136.
    4. Worrell, Ernst & Price, Lynn & Martin, Nathan, 2001. "Energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction opportunities in the US iron and steel sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 513-536.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheline, W. & Matthews, L. & Lindeke, N. & Duncan, S. & Palumbo, R., 2013. "An exploratory study of the solar thermal electrolytic production of Mg from MgO," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 163-170.
    2. Chen, Zhenling & Zhang, Xiaoling & Ni, Guohua, 2020. "Decomposing capacity utilization under carbon dioxide emissions reduction constraints in data envelopment analysis: An application to Chinese regions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Wang, Can & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Gao, Xue & Berrill, Peter, 2017. "Unexpected water impacts of energy-saving measures in the iron and steel sector: Tradeoffs or synergies?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1119-1127.
    4. Sato, S. & Grubb, M. & Cust, J. & Chan, K. & Korppoo, A. & Ceppi, P., 2007. "Differentiation and dynamics of competitiveness impacts from the EU ETS," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0712, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    5. Flues, Florens & Rübbelke, Dirk & Vögele, Stefan, 2013. "Energy Efficiency and Industrial Output: The Case of the Iron and Steel Industry," Energy: Resources and Markets 162379, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. Jou, Chih-Ju G. & Wu, Chung-Rung & Lee, Chien-Li, 2010. "Reduction of energy cost and CO2 emission for the furnace using energy recovered from waste tail-gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1232-1236.
    7. Chao-Qun Ma & Jiang-Long Liu & Yi-Shuai Ren & Yong Jiang, 2019. "The Impact of Economic Growth, FDI and Energy Intensity on China’s Manufacturing Industry’s CO 2 Emissions: An Empirical Study Based on the Fixed-Effect Panel Quantile Regression Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Yan, Xing L. & Kasahara, Seiji & Tachibana, Yukio & Kunitomi, Kazuhiko, 2012. "Study of a nuclear energy supplied steelmaking system for near-term application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 154-165.
    9. Johansson, Maria T. & Söderström, Mats, 2011. "Options for the Swedish steel industry – Energy efficiency measures and fuel conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 191-198.
    10. Fu, Yang & Zheng, Zeyu, 2020. "Volatility modeling and the asymmetric effect for China’s carbon trading pilot market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 542(C).
    11. Jing-Ming Chen & Biying Yu & Yi-Ming Wei, 2019. "CO2 emissions accounting for the chemical industry: an empirical analysis for China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(3), pages 1327-1343, December.
    12. Li, Yuan & Zhu, Lei, 2014. "Cost of energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction in China’s iron and steel sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 603-616.
    13. Long Li & Yinting Li, 2022. "The Spatial Relationship between CO 2 Emissions and Economic Growth in the Construction Industry: Based on the Tapio Decoupling Model and STIRPAT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Kim, Yeonbae & Worrell, Ernst, 2002. "International comparison of CO2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 827-838, August.
    15. Arens, Marlene & Worrell, Ernst & Schleich, Joachim, 2012. "Energy intensity development of the German iron and steel industry between 1991 and 2007," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 786-797.
    16. Yang, Lisha & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Carbon dioxide-emission in China׳s power industry: Evidence and policy implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 258-267.
    17. Chen, Hao & Kang, Jia-Ning & Liao, Hua & Tang, Bao-Jun & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Costs and potentials of energy conservation in China's coal-fired power industry: A bottom-up approach considering price uncertainties," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 23-32.
    18. Lin, Boqiang & Moubarak, Mohamed, 2014. "Mitigation potential of carbon dioxide emissions in the Chinese textile industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 781-787.
    19. Rodrigues da Silva, Rafael & Mathias, Flavio Roberto de Carvalho & Bajay, Sergio Valdir, 2018. "Potential energy efficiency improvements for the Brazilian iron and steel industry: Fuel and electricity conservation supply curves for integrated steel mills," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 816-824.
    20. Stefan Vögele & Dirk Rübbelke & Kristina Govorukha & Matthias Grajewski, 2020. "Socio-technical scenarios for energy-intensive industries: the future of steel production in Germany," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1763-1778, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:135:y:2017:i:c:p:182-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.