IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v60y2013icp345-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of support schemes and barriers in Europe on the evolution of cogeneration

Author

Listed:
  • Moya, José Antonio

Abstract

This paper analyses the effectiveness of different support measures to promote cogeneration in the European Union. The analysis looks into the average progress of cogeneration between two different periods. The economic effect of the support measures in each country is quantified with the help of a cost–benefit analysis carried out by the Cogeneration Observatory and Dissemination Europe (CODE) project. The scope of this study is necessarily affected by the need to limit the number of projects and support measures. However, there is no evidence of a relationship between the economic advantage offered by support measures and the deployment of cogeneration in the Member States. The study considers the effect of different barriers (reported by the Member States) on the promotion of cogeneration. The individual analyses of the barriers differ widely in quality and depth. When some barriers are reported, there is an increase of the variability of the penetration of cogeneration. This counter-intuitive fact leads us to conclude that there is a lack of consistency in the barriers reported, and a clear need for consistent reporting on barriers. The possible effect of competition between measures supporting combined heat and power and renewable energy sources is also analysed.

Suggested Citation

  • Moya, José Antonio, 2013. "Impact of support schemes and barriers in Europe on the evolution of cogeneration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 345-355.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:60:y:2013:i:c:p:345-355
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421513003844
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pardo, Nicolás & Moya, José Antonio & Mercier, Arnaud, 2011. "Prospective on the energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the EU cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3244-3254.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giorgio Pagliarini & Sara Rainieri & Pamela Vocale, 2014. "Energy Efficiency of Existing Buildings: Optimization of Building Cooling, Heating and Power (BCHP) Systems," Energy & Environment, , vol. 25(8), pages 1423-1438, December.
    2. Franco, Alessandro & Versace, Michele, 2017. "Optimum sizing and operational strategy of CHP plant for district heating based on the use of composite indicators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 258-271.
    3. Kavvadias, K.C., 2016. "Energy price spread as a driving force for combined generation investments: A view on Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1632-1639.
    4. Comodi, Gabriele & Rossi, Mosè, 2016. "Energy versus economic effectiveness in CHP (combined heat and power) applications: Investigation on the critical role of commodities price, taxation and power grid mix efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 124-136.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Talaei, Alireza & Pier, David & Iyer, Aishwarya V. & Ahiduzzaman, Md & Kumar, Amit, 2019. "Assessment of long-term energy efficiency improvement and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation options for the cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1051-1066.
    2. Kermeli, Katerina & Edelenbosch, Oreane Y. & Crijns-Graus, Wina & van Ruijven, Bas J. & Mima, Silvana & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Worrell, Ernst, 2019. "The scope for better industry representation in long-term energy models: Modeling the cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 964-985.
    3. Nayeah Kim & Yun Seop Hwang & Mun Ho Hwang, 2019. "New projection of GHG reduction potentials for Korea’s cement industry and comparison with Roadmap 2030," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(3), pages 499-521, May.
    4. Gao, Tianming & Shen, Lei & Shen, Ming & Liu, Litao & Chen, Fengnan & Gao, Li, 2017. "Evolution and projection of CO2 emissions for China's cement industry from 1980 to 2020," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 522-537.
    5. Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Vujanović, Milan & Duić, Neven, 2013. "Reducing the CO2 emissions in Croatian cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 41-48.
    6. Dinga, Christian Doh & Wen, Zongguo, 2022. "China's green deal: Can China's cement industry achieve carbon neutral emissions by 2060?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Blanco, Christian C. & Caro, Felipe & Corbett, Charles J., 2020. "Do carbon abatement opportunities become less profitable over time? A global firm-level perspective using CDP data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Huh, Sung-Yoon & Lee, Hyejin & Shin, Jungwoo & Lee, Donghyun & Jang, Jinyoung, 2018. "Inter-fuel substitution path analysis of the korea cement industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 4091-4099.
    9. Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Vujanović, Milan & Fidaros, Dimitris K. & Priesching, Peter & Minić, Ivica & Tatschl, Reinhard & Duić, Neven & Stefanović, Gordana, 2012. "The application of CFD modelling to support the reduction of CO2 emissions in cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 464-473.
    10. Branger, Frédéric & Quirion, Philippe, 2015. "Reaping the carbon rent: Abatement and overallocation profits in the European cement industry, insights from an LMDI decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 189-205.
    11. Tesema, Gudise & Worrell, Ernst, 2015. "Energy efficiency improvement potentials for the cement industry in Ethiopia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2042-2052.
    12. Dong, Huijuan & Ohnishi, Satoshi & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Geng, Yong & Fujii, Minoru & Dong, Liang, 2014. "Achieving carbon emission reduction through industrial & urban symbiosis: A case of Kawasaki," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 277-286.
    13. Chen, Jing-Ming & Yu, Biying & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2018. "Energy technology roadmap for ethylene industry in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 160-174.
    14. Zuberi, M. Jibran S. & Bless, Frédéric & Chambers, Jonathan & Arpagaus, Cordin & Bertsch, Stefan S. & Patel, Martin K., 2018. "Excess heat recovery: An invisible energy resource for the Swiss industry sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 390-408.
    15. Yang Xi & Teng Fei & Wang Gehua, 2013. "Quantifying co-benefit potentials in the Chinese cement sector during 12th Five Year Plan: an analysis based on marginal abatement cost with monetized environmental effect," Post-Print hal-03501949, HAL.
    16. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2015. "How industrialization and urbanization process impacts on CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from nonparametric additive regression models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 188-202.
    17. Herrera, Bernardo & Amell, Andrés & Chejne, Farid & Cacua, Karen & Manrique, Raiza & Henao, Wilson & Vallejo, Gabriel, 2017. "Use of thermal energy and analysis of barriers to the implementation of thermal efficiency measures in cement production: Exploratory study in Colombia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1047-1058.
    18. Kong-Qing Li & Ran Lu & Rui-Wen Chu & Dou-Dou Ma & Li-Qun Zhu, 2018. "Trends and Driving Forces of Carbon Emissions from Energy Consumption: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    19. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat, 2020. "Carbon footprint of construction industry: A global review and supply chain analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    20. Cancio Díaz, Yudiesky & Sánchez Berriel, Sofia & Heierli, Urs & Favier, Aurélie R. & Sánchez Machado, Inocencio R. & Scrivener, Karen L. & Martirena Hernández, José Fernando & Habert, Guillaume, 2017. "Limestone calcined clay cement as a low-carbon solution to meet expanding cement demand in emerging economies," Development Engineering, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 82-91.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:60:y:2013:i:c:p:345-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.