IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v311y2023i3p816-832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intelligent optimization under the makespan constraint: Rapid evaluation mechanisms based on the critical machine for the distributed flowshop group scheduling problem

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yuhang
  • Han, Yuyan
  • Wang, Yuting
  • Tasgetiren, M. Fatih
  • Li, Junqing
  • Gao, Kaizhou

Abstract

In the flowshop scheduling literature, the insertion-based neighborhood search method is often considered to obtain high-quality solutions. It will lead to expending extensive computational effort when evaluating the objective function. Rapid evaluation methods based on Taillard's acceleration can reduce the time complexity of function evaluation. However, existing rapid evaluation methods cannot be applied directly to the distributed flowshop group scheduling problem (DFGSP), especially to minimize the total tardiness time objective. Thus, we first proposed two theorems and their proofs based on the critical machine. Then, two rapid evaluation methods based on these theorems are proposed to accelerate the evaluation of the objective. Considering the multiple coupled sub-problems in the DFGSP, we proposed a cooperative iterated greedy algorithm (CIG) combining two rapid evaluation methods, in which inter-group and intra-group neighborhood search strategies are proposed to enhance the search depth and breadth. Comprehensive statistical experiments show that computational effort is extensively decreased in the calculation of total tardiness time, and the CIG algorithm significantly outperforms the eight compared algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yuhang & Han, Yuyan & Wang, Yuting & Tasgetiren, M. Fatih & Li, Junqing & Gao, Kaizhou, 2023. "Intelligent optimization under the makespan constraint: Rapid evaluation mechanisms based on the critical machine for the distributed flowshop group scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 816-832.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:311:y:2023:i:3:p:816-832
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.05.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723003740
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.05.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taillard, E., 1990. "Some efficient heuristic methods for the flow shop sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 65-74, July.
    2. Ruiz, Ruben & Stutzle, Thomas, 2007. "A simple and effective iterated greedy algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 2033-2049, March.
    3. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Molina-Pariente, Jose M. & Framinan, Jose M., 2020. "Generalised accelerations for insertion-based heuristics in permutation flowshop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 858-872.
    4. Taha Keshavarz & Nasser Salmasi & Mohsen Varmazyar, 2019. "Flowshop sequence-dependent group scheduling with minimisation of weighted earliness and tardiness," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 54-80.
    5. Allahverdi, Ali & Aydilek, Harun & Aydilek, Asiye, 2018. "No-wait flowshop scheduling problem with two criteria; total tardiness and makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 590-601.
    6. Ruiz, Rubén & Pan, Quan-Ke & Naderi, Bahman, 2019. "Iterated Greedy methods for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 213-222.
    7. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-50.
    8. Shuaipeng Yuan & Tieke Li & Bailin Wang, 2021. "A discrete differential evolution algorithm for flow shop group scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup and transportation times," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 427-439, February.
    9. Allahverdi, Ali & Aydilek, Harun & Aydilek, Asiye, 2020. "No-wait flowshop scheduling problem with separate setup times to minimize total tardiness subject to makespan," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    10. Schaller, Jeffrey E. & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Vakharia, Asoo J., 2000. "Scheduling a flowline manufacturing cell with sequence dependent family setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 324-339, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2024. "A review and classification on distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 1-21.
    2. Libralesso, Luc & Focke, Pablo Andres & Secardin, Aurélien & Jost, Vincent, 2022. "Iterative beam search algorithms for the permutation flowshop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 217-234.
    3. Chenyao Zhang & Yuyan Han & Yuting Wang & Junqing Li & Kaizhou Gao, 2023. "A Distributed Blocking Flowshop Scheduling with Setup Times Using Multi-Factory Collaboration Iterated Greedy Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, January.
    4. He, Xuan & Pan, Quan-Ke & Gao, Liang & Neufeld, Janis S., 2023. "An asymmetric traveling salesman problem based matheuristic algorithm for flowshop group scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 597-610.
    5. Said Aqil & Karam Allali, 2021. "On a bi-criteria flow shop scheduling problem under constraints of blocking and sequence dependent setup time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 615-637, January.
    6. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Talens, Carla & Framinan, Jose M., 2022. "Assembly flowshop scheduling problem: Speed-up procedure and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 869-882.
    7. Victor Fernandez-Viagas & Luis Sanchez-Mediano & Alvaro Angulo-Cortes & David Gomez-Medina & Jose Manuel Molina-Pariente, 2022. "The Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with Human Resources: MILP Models, Decoding Procedures, NEH-Based Heuristics, and an Iterated Greedy Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-32, September.
    8. Yong Wang & Yuting Wang & Yuyan Han, 2023. "A Variant Iterated Greedy Algorithm Integrating Multiple Decoding Rules for Hybrid Blocking Flow Shop Scheduling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Ruiz, Rubén & Pan, Quan-Ke & Naderi, Bahman, 2019. "Iterated Greedy methods for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 213-222.
    10. Karimi-Mamaghan, Maryam & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Pasdeloup, Bastien & Meyer, Patrick, 2023. "Learning to select operators in meta-heuristics: An integration of Q-learning into the iterated greedy algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1296-1330.
    11. Kuo-Ching Ying & Yi-Ju Tsai, 2017. "Minimising total cost for training and assigning multiskilled workers in production systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(10), pages 2978-2989, May.
    12. Pan, Quan-Ke & Gao, Liang & Li, Xin-Yu & Gao, Kai-Zhou, 2017. "Effective metaheuristics for scheduling a hybrid flowshop with sequence-dependent setup times," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 303(C), pages 89-112.
    13. Yepes-Borrero, Juan C. & Perea, Federico & Ruiz, Rubén & Villa, Fulgencia, 2021. "Bi-objective parallel machine scheduling with additional resources during setups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 443-455.
    14. Pagnozzi, Federico & Stützle, Thomas, 2019. "Automatic design of hybrid stochastic local search algorithms for permutation flowshop problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 409-421.
    15. Hatami, Sara & Ruiz, Rubén & Andrés-Romano, Carlos, 2015. "Heuristics and metaheuristics for the distributed assembly permutation flowshop scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 76-88.
    16. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2017. "A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 707-721.
    17. Kalczynski, Pawel J. & Kamburowski, Jerzy, 2009. "An empirical analysis of the optimality rate of flow shop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 93-101, October.
    18. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-50.
    19. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2012. "An estimation of distribution algorithm for lot-streaming flow shop problems with setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 166-180, April.
    20. Wang, Chuyang & Li, Xiaoping & Wang, Qian, 2010. "Accelerated tabu search for no-wait flowshop scheduling problem with maximum lateness criterion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 64-72, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:311:y:2023:i:3:p:816-832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.