IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v295y2021i2p718-732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal insurance contract specification in the upstream sector of the oil and gas industry

Author

Listed:
  • Torraca, Ana Patrícia
  • Fanzeres, Bruno

Abstract

The upstream sector of the Oil and Gas (O&G) industry is recognized by its capital-intensive projects and complex and hazardous associated recovery and production processes, thus susceptible for large and financially damaging accidents. In this context, to avoid the risk and impact of high expenses, O&G companies usually acquire insurance contracts. In practice, although the contract format is typically pre-specified, its parameter magnitudes can be adjusted aiming at maximizing the company total wealth. Therefore, this work proposes a holistic methodology to assess the optimal parameter specification of an insurance contract in the upstream sector of the O&G industry. A non-convex stochastic optimization problem is constructed aiming at maximizing a risk-adjusted measure of the policyholder total wealth. The modeling takes into account the uncertainty on the financial loss of an accident by making use of the safety barriers and precursor information framework. The non-convex optimization problem is cast as an equivalent mixed-integer linear programming problem by combining the scenario-based representation approach with a set of binary reformulation procedures. We illustrate the applicability of the proposed methodology with a set of numerical experiments. In a nutshell, we found that the proposed parameter specification methodology resulted in greater predictability when compared to two quantile-based specification policies and an uninsured company. In fact, the second best policy presented a standard deviation 103% higher than the proposed methodology. Furthermore, the model also provided greater protection against extreme events, since the second best policy presented a Conditional Value-at-Risk 41% higher than the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Torraca, Ana Patrícia & Fanzeres, Bruno, 2021. "Optimal insurance contract specification in the upstream sector of the oil and gas industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 718-732.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:295:y:2021:i:2:p:718-732
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.03.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221721002010
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.03.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Ying & Li, Xiaozhong & Liu, Yinli, 2015. "The bounds of premium and optimality of stop loss insurance under uncertain random environments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 273-278.
    2. J. David Cummins & Olivier Mahul, 2004. "The Demand for Insurance With an Upper Limit on Coverage," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 71(2), pages 253-264, June.
    3. Sun, Haoze & Weng, Chengguo & Zhang, Yi, 2017. "Optimal multivariate quota-share reinsurance: A nonparametric mean-CVaR framework," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 197-214.
    4. Carole Bernard & Xuedong He & Jia-An Yan & Xun Yu Zhou, 2015. "Optimal Insurance Design Under Rank-Dependent Expected Utility," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 154-186, January.
    5. Jost, Peter-J., 2016. "Competitive insurance pricing with complete information, loss-averse utility and finitely many policies," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 11-21.
    6. Carole Bernard & Shaolin Ji & Weidong Tian, 2013. "An optimal insurance design problem under Knightian uncertainty," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 36(2), pages 99-124, November.
    7. Schütz, Peter & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Ahmed, Shabbir, 2009. "Supply chain design under uncertainty using sample average approximation and dual decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 409-419, December.
    8. Gutierrez, Tomás & Pagnoncelli, Bernardo & Valladão, Davi & Cifuentes, Arturo, 2019. "Can asset allocation limits determine portfolio risk–return profiles in DC pension schemes?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 134-144.
    9. Emelogu, Adindu & Chowdhury, Sudipta & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan & Eksioglu, Burak, 2016. "An enhanced sample average approximation method for stochastic optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 230-252.
    10. J. David Cummins & Olivier Mahul, 2004. "The demand for insurance with an upper limit on coverage," Post-Print hal-01952122, HAL.
    11. F. W. Meng & J. Sun & M. Goh, 2010. "Stochastic Optimization Problems with CVaR Risk Measure and Their Sample Average Approximation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 399-418, August.
    12. Blazenko, George, 1985. "The Design of an Optimal Insurance Policy: Note," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 253-255, March.
    13. Ramsay, Colin M. & Oguledo, Victor I., 2012. "Insurance pricing with complete information, state-dependent utility, and production costs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 462-469.
    14. Alexandre Street, 2010. "On the Conditional Value-at-Risk probability-dependent utility function," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 49-68, February.
    15. Santoso, Tjendera & Ahmed, Shabbir & Goetschalckx, Marc & Shapiro, Alexander, 2005. "A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 96-115, November.
    16. Raviv, Artur, 1979. "The Design of an Optimal Insurance Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(1), pages 84-96, March.
    17. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    18. Fanzeres, Bruno & Ahmed, Shabbir & Street, Alexandre, 2019. "Robust strategic bidding in auction-based markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1158-1172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boonen, Tim J. & Ghossoub, Mario, 2023. "Bowley vs. Pareto optima in reinsurance contracting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 382-391.
    2. Gehad Mohammed Ahmed Naji & Ahmad Shahrul Nizam Isha & Abdulsamad Alazzani & Paula Brough & Muhammad Shoaib Saleem & Mysara Eissa Mohyaldinn & Mohammed Alzoraiki, 2022. "Do Leadership, Organizational Communication, and Work Environment Impact Employees’ Psychosocial Hazards in the Oil and Gas Industry?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chi, Yichun & Zhuang, Sheng Chao, 2022. "Regret-based optimal insurance design," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 22-41.
    2. Yichun Chi & Xun Yu Zhou & Sheng Chao Zhuang, 2020. "Variance Contracts," Papers 2008.07103, arXiv.org.
    3. Chi, Yichun, 2018. "Insurance choice under third degree stochastic dominance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 198-205.
    4. Corina Birghila & Tim J. Boonen & Mario Ghossoub, 2020. "Optimal Insurance under Maxmin Expected Utility," Papers 2010.07383, arXiv.org.
    5. Birghila, Corina & Pflug, Georg Ch., 2019. "Optimal XL-insurance under Wasserstein-type ambiguity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 30-43.
    6. Lu, ZhiYi & Meng, LiLi & Wang, Yujin & Shen, Qingjie, 2016. "Optimal reinsurance under VaR and TVaR risk measures in the presence of reinsurer’s risk limit," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 92-100.
    7. Neil A. Doherty & Christian Laux & Alexander Muermann, 2015. "Insuring Nonverifiable Losses," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 19(1), pages 283-316.
    8. Christopher Gaffney & Adi Ben-Israel, 2016. "A simple insurance model: optimal coverage and deductible," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 263-279, February.
    9. Sahling, Florian & Kayser, Ariane, 2016. "Strategic supply network planning with vendor selection under consideration of risk and demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 201-214.
    10. Sung, K.C.J. & Yam, S.C.P. & Yung, S.P. & Zhou, J.H., 2011. "Behavioral optimal insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 418-428.
    11. Govindan, Kannan & Fattahi, Mohammad, 2017. "Investigating risk and robustness measures for supply chain network design under demand uncertainty: A case study of glass supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 680-699.
    12. Zhou, Chunyang & Wu, Wenfeng & Wu, Chongfeng, 2010. "Optimal insurance in the presence of insurer's loss limit," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 300-307, April.
    13. Wang, Qiuqi & Wang, Ruodu & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2022. "Risk measures induced by efficient insurance contracts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 56-65.
    14. Carole Bernard & Weidong Tian, 2010. "Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 35(1), pages 47-80, June.
    15. Carole Bernard & Weidong Tian, 2009. "Optimal Reinsurance Arrangements Under Tail Risk Measures," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 76(3), pages 709-725, September.
    16. Asimit, Vali & Boonen, Tim J., 2018. "Insurance with multiple insurers: A game-theoretic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 778-790.
    17. Christopher Gaffney & Adi Ben-Israel, 2016. "A simple insurance model: optimal coverage and deductible," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 263-279, February.
    18. Boonen, Tim J. & Liu, Fangda, 2022. "Insurance with heterogeneous preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    19. Quddus, Md Abdul & Shahvari, Omid & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Ekşioğlu, Sandra D. & Castillo-Villar, Krystel K., 2021. "Designing a reliable electric vehicle charging station expansion under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    20. Emelogu, Adindu & Chowdhury, Sudipta & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan & Eksioglu, Burak, 2016. "An enhanced sample average approximation method for stochastic optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 230-252.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:295:y:2021:i:2:p:718-732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.