IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v295y2021i1p374-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A one-sided Vysochanskii-Petunin inequality with financial applications

Author

Listed:
  • Mercadier, Mathieu
  • Strobel, Frank

Abstract

We derive a one-sided Vysochanskii-Petunin inequality, providing probability bounds for random variables analogous to those given by Cantelli’s inequality under the additional assumption of unimodality, potentially relevant for applied statistical practice across a wide range of disciplines. As a possible application of this inequality in a financial context, we examine refined bounds for the individual risk measure of Value-at-Risk, providing a potentially useful alternative benchmark with interesting regulatory implications for the Basel multiplier.

Suggested Citation

  • Mercadier, Mathieu & Strobel, Frank, 2021. "A one-sided Vysochanskii-Petunin inequality with financial applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 374-377.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:295:y:2021:i:1:p:374-377
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.02.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221721001545
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.02.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babat, Onur & Vera, Juan C. & Zuluaga, Luis F., 2018. "Computing near-optimal Value-at-Risk portfolios using integer programming techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 304-315.
    2. Leung, Melvern & Li, Youwei & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Vigne, Samuel A., 2021. "Bayesian Value-at-Risk backtesting: The case of annuity pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 786-801.
    3. Mercadier, Mathieu & Lardy, Jean-Pierre, 2019. "Credit spread approximation and improvement using random forest regression," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 351-365.
    4. Staino, Alessandro & Russo, Emilio, 2020. "Nested Conditional Value-at-Risk portfolio selection: A model with temporal dependence driven by market-index volatility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(2), pages 741-753.
    5. Jeremy Berkowitz & Peter Christoffersen & Denis Pelletier, 2011. "Evaluating Value-at-Risk Models with Desk-Level Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(12), pages 2213-2227, December.
    6. Markus Leippold & Nikola Vasiljević, 2020. "Option-Implied Intrahorizon Value at Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 397-414, January.
    7. Meng, Xiaochun & Taylor, James W., 2020. "Estimating Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall using the intraday low and range data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(1), pages 191-202.
    8. James W. Taylor, 2019. "Forecasting Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Using a Semiparametric Approach Based on the Asymmetric Laplace Distribution," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 121-133, January.
    9. P. M. Hartigan, 1985. "Computation of the Dip Statistic to Test for Unimodality," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 34(3), pages 320-325, November.
    10. Barrieu, Pauline & Scandolo, Giacomo, 2015. "Assessing financial model risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 546-556.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lazar, Emese & Wang, Shixuan & Xue, Xiaohan, 2023. "Loss function-based change point detection in risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 415-431.
    2. Taras Bodnar & Mathias Lindholm & Vilhelm Niklasson & Erik Thors'en, 2020. "Bayesian Quantile-Based Portfolio Selection," Papers 2012.01819, arXiv.org.
    3. Zhimin Wu & Guanghui Cai, 2024. "Can intraday data improve the joint estimation and prediction of risk measures? Evidence from a variety of realized measures," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1956-1974, September.
    4. Mitrodima, Gelly & Oberoi, Jaideep, 2024. "CAViaR models for Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall with long range dependency features," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120880, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Vincenzo Candila & Giampiero M. Gallo & Lea Petrella, 2020. "Mixed--frequency quantile regressions to forecast Value--at--Risk and Expected Shortfall," Papers 2011.00552, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    6. Fiszeder, Piotr & Małecka, Marta & Molnár, Peter, 2024. "Robust estimation of the range-based GARCH model: Forecasting volatility, value at risk and expected shortfall of cryptocurrencies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Gao, Lingbo & Ye, Wuyi & Guo, Ranran, 2022. "Jointly forecasting the value-at-risk and expected shortfall of Bitcoin with a regime-switching CAViaR model," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    8. Radu Tunaru, 2015. "Model Risk in Financial Markets:From Financial Engineering to Risk Management," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 9524.
    9. Lazar, Emese & Qi, Shuyuan, 2022. "Model risk in the over-the-counter market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 769-784.
    10. Le-Yu Chen & Yu-Min Yen, 2025. "Estimation of the Local Conditional Tail Average Treatment Effect," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 241-255, January.
    11. Timo Dimitriadis & Tobias Fissler & Johanna Ziegel, 2020. "The Efficiency Gap," Papers 2010.14146, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    12. Luigi Aldieri & Alessandra Amendola & Vincenzo Candila, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Scores on Risk Market Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Lyócsa, Štefan & Plíhal, Tomáš & Výrost, Tomáš, 2024. "Forecasting day-ahead expected shortfall on the EUR/USD exchange rate: The (I)relevance of implied volatility," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 1275-1301.
    14. James Ming Chen, 2018. "On Exactitude in Financial Regulation: Value-at-Risk, Expected Shortfall, and Expectiles," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, June.
    15. Le, Trung H., 2020. "Forecasting value at risk and expected shortfall with mixed data sampling," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1362-1379.
    16. Yan Fang & Jian Li & Yinglin Liu & Yunfan Zhao, 2023. "Semiparametric estimation of expected shortfall and its application in finance," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 835-851, July.
    17. Ning Zhang & Yujing Gong & Xiaohan Xue, 2023. "Less disagreement, better forecasts: Adjusted risk measures in the energy futures market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(10), pages 1332-1372, October.
    18. Md Akhtaruzzaman & Ramzi Benkraiem & Sabri Boubaker & Constantin Zopounidis, 2022. "COVID‐19 crisis and risk spillovers to developing economies: Evidence from Africa," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 898-918, May.
    19. Lara Martínez del Pino & Ana Arana & Leopoldo Alfonso & José Antonio Mendizábal & Beatriz Soret, 2017. "Adiposity and adipogenic gene expression in four different muscles in beef cattle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Evangelos Vasileiou, 2022. "Inaccurate Value at Risk Estimations: Bad Modeling or Inappropriate Data?," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 1155-1171, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:295:y:2021:i:1:p:374-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.