IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v201y2010i2p601-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using FSBT technique with Rough Set Theory for personal investment portfolio analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Shyng, Jhieh-Yu
  • Shieh, How-Ming
  • Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
  • Hsieh, Shu-Huei

Abstract

This study proposes a novel Forward Search and Backward Trace (FSBT) technique based on Rough Set Theory to improve data analysis and extend the scope of observations made from sample data to solve personal investment portfolio problems. Rough Set Theory mathematically classifies data into class sets. The class set with the most objects may generate one decision rule. The rules generated from RST are rough and fragmented, that are very difficult to interpret the information. An empirical case is used to generate more than 85 rules by the RST method in comparison with FSBT method which only generated 14 rules. This result can show our proposed method is better than traditional RST method based on class sets that contain the most objects. Much of human knowledge is described in natural language. It is a very important thing to convert information from computer databases into normal human language. Sample data taken from features with the same backgrounds are used to compile different portfolios that investment companies and investment advisors can employ to satisfy the investor' needs. The method not only can provide decision-making rules, but also can offer alternative strategies for better data analysis. We believe that the FSBT technique can be fully applied in research on investment marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Shyng, Jhieh-Yu & Shieh, How-Ming & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung & Hsieh, Shu-Huei, 2010. "Using FSBT technique with Rough Set Theory for personal investment portfolio analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 601-607, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:201:y:2010:i:2:p:601-607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(09)00199-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beynon, Malcolm J. & Peel, Michael J., 2001. "Variable precision rough set theory and data discretisation: an application to corporate failure prediction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 561-576, December.
    2. Pawlak, Zdzislaw, 2004. "Decisions rules and flow networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 184-190, April.
    3. Pawlak, Zdzislaw, 2002. "Rough sets, decision algorithms and Bayes' theorem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 181-189, January.
    4. Dimitras, A. I. & Slowinski, R. & Susmaga, R. & Zopounidis, C., 1999. "Business failure prediction using rough sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 263-280, April.
    5. Plath, D. Anthony & Stevenson, Thomas H., 2005. "Financial services consumption behavior across Hispanic American consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(8), pages 1089-1099, August.
    6. Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Slowinski, Roman, 2001. "Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 1-47, February.
    7. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 77-91, March.
    8. Azibi, R. & Vanderpooten, D., 2002. "Construction of rule-based assignment models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 274-293, April.
    9. Fan, Tuan-Fang & Liu, Duen-Ren & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2007. "Rough set-based logics for multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 340-355, October.
    10. Sawicki, Piotr & Zak, Jacek, 2009. "Technical diagnostic of a fleet of vehicles using rough set theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 891-903, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Chun-Che & Liang, Wen-Yau & Tseng, Tzu-Liang (Bill) & Wong, Ruo-Yin, 2015. "A rough set-based corporate memory for the case of ecotourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 22-33.
    2. Iftikhar Ul Haq & Tanzeela Shaheen & Wajid Ali & Hamza Toor & Tapan Senapati & Francesco Pilla & Sarbast Moslem, 2023. "Novel Fermatean Fuzzy Aczel–Alsina Model for Investment Strategy Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Chen, Yan & Wang, Xuancheng, 2015. "A hybrid stock trading system using genetic network programming and mean conditional value-at-risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 861-871.
    4. Nonna Kushnirovich, 2016. "Immigrant investors in financial markets: modes of financial behavior," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 992-1006, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sawicki, Piotr & Zak, Jacek, 2009. "Technical diagnostic of a fleet of vehicles using rough set theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 891-903, March.
    2. I Y-F Huang & W-W Wu & Y-T Lee, 2008. "Simplifying essential competencies for Taiwan civil servants using the rough set approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 259-265, February.
    3. Beynon, Malcolm J., 2005. "A novel technique of object ranking and classification under ignorance: An application to the corporate failure risk problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(2), pages 493-517, December.
    4. Azam, Nouman & Zhang, Yan & Yao, JingTao, 2017. "Evaluation functions and decision conditions of three-way decisions with game-theoretic rough sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 704-714.
    5. Salvatore Barbagallo & Simona Consoli & Nello Pappalardo & Salvatore Greco & Santo Zimbone, 2006. "Discovering Reservoir Operating Rules by a Rough Set Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(1), pages 19-36, February.
    6. Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 2002. "Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 229-246, April.
    7. Liao, Jui-Jung & Shih, Ching-Hui & Chen, Tai-Feng & Hsu, Ming-Fu, 2014. "An ensemble-based model for two-class imbalanced financial problem," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 175-183.
    8. Ooghe, H. & De Prijcker, S., 2006. "Failure processes and causes of company bankruptcy: a typology," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2006-21, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
    9. Chen, Yan & Wang, Xuancheng, 2015. "A hybrid stock trading system using genetic network programming and mean conditional value-at-risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 861-871.
    10. Du, Wen Sheng & Hu, Bao Qing, 2018. "A fast heuristic attribute reduction approach to ordered decision systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 440-452.
    11. Apostolos G. Christopoulos & Ioannis G. Dokas & Iraklis Kollias & John Leventides, 2019. "An implementation of Soft Set Theory in the Variables Selection Process for Corporate Failure Prediction Models. Evidence from NASDAQ Listed Firms," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20.
    12. Yuan Li & Xiuwu Liao & Wenhong Zhao, 2009. "A rough set approach to knowledge discovery in analyzing competitive advantages of firms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 205-223, April.
    13. Sanchis, A. & Segovia, M.J. & Gil, J.A. & Heras, A. & Vilar, J.L., 2007. "Rough Sets and the role of the monetary policy in financial stability (macroeconomic problem) and the prediction of insolvency in insurance sector (microeconomic problem)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1554-1573, September.
    14. Chen, Li-Fei & Tsai, Chih-Tsung, 2016. "Data mining framework based on rough set theory to improve location selection decisions: A case study of a restaurant chain," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 197-206.
    15. Salvatore Corrente & Salvatore Greco & Benedetto Matarazzo & Roman Słowiński, 2016. "Robust ordinal regression for decision under risk and uncertainty," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 55-83, January.
    16. Samaras, Georgios D. & Matsatsinis, Nikolaos F. & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2008. "A multicriteria DSS for stock evaluation using fundamental analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1380-1401, June.
    17. Du, Wen Sheng & Hu, Bao Qing, 2017. "Dominance-based rough fuzzy set approach and its application to rule induction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 690-703.
    18. Şaban Çelik, 2013. "Micro Credit Risk Metrics: A Comprehensive Review," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 233-272, October.
    19. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2004. "Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: Traces, Dominance, and Numerical Representations," Post-Print hal-00004104, HAL.
    20. Xie, Feng & Lin, Yi & Ren, Wenwei, 2011. "Optimizing model for land use/land cover retrieval from remote sensing imagery based on variable precision rough sets," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 232-240.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:201:y:2010:i:2:p:601-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.