IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v201y2010i2p390-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approach to find redundant objective function(s) and redundant constraint(s) in multi-objective nonlinear stochastic fractional programming problems

Author

Listed:
  • Charles, V.
  • Udhayakumar, A.
  • Rhymend Uthariaraj, V.

Abstract

Structural redundancies in mathematical programming models are nothing uncommon and nonlinear programming problems are no exception. Over the past few decades numerous papers have been written on redundancy. Redundancy in constraints and variables are usually studied in a class of mathematical programming problems. However, main emphasis has so far been given only to linear programming problems. In this paper, an algorithm that identifies redundant objective function(s) and redundant constraint(s) simultaneously in multi-objective nonlinear stochastic fractional programming problems is provided. A solution procedure is also illustrated with numerical examples. The proposed algorithm reduces the number of nonlinear fractional objective functions and constraints in cases where redundancy exists.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles, V. & Udhayakumar, A. & Rhymend Uthariaraj, V., 2010. "An approach to find redundant objective function(s) and redundant constraint(s) in multi-objective nonlinear stochastic fractional programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 390-398, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:201:y:2010:i:2:p:390-398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(09)00193-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mishra, Savita, 2007. "Weighting method for bi-level linear fractional programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 296-302, November.
    2. V. Charles & D. Dutta, 2006. "Identification Of Redundant Objective Functions In Multi-Objective Stochastic Fractional Programming Problems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 155-170.
    3. Hu, Chao-Fang & Teng, Chang-Jun & Li, Shao-Yuan, 2007. "A fuzzy goal programming approach to multi-objective optimization problem with priorities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1319-1333, February.
    4. Abbas, Moncef & Bellahcene, Fatima, 2006. "Cutting plane method for multiple objective stochastic integer linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(3), pages 967-984, February.
    5. Gal, Tomas & Leberling, Heiner, 1977. "Redundant objective functions in linear vector maximum problems and their determination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 176-184, May.
    6. V. Charles & D. Dutta, 2006. "Extremization of multi-objective stochastic fractional programming problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 297-304, March.
    7. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1954. "The Stepping Stone Method of Explaining Linear Programming Calculations in Transportation Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 49-69, October.
    8. DePaolo, Concetta A. & Rader, David Jr., 2007. "A heuristic algorithm for a chance constrained stochastic program," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 27-45, January.
    9. Biswal, M. P. & Biswal, N. P. & Li, Duan, 1998. "Probabilistic linear programming problems with exponential random variables: A technical note," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 589-597, December.
    10. Chen, Youhua Frank, 2005. "Fractional programming approach to two stochastic inventory problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(1), pages 63-71, January.
    11. Nykowski, Ireneusz & Zolkiewski, Zbigniew, 1985. "A compromise procedure for the multiple objective linear fractional programming problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 91-97, January.
    12. Stanley Zionts & Jyrki Wallenius, 1976. "An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 652-663, February.
    13. Dutta, D. & Rao, J. R. & Tiwari, R. N., 1993. "A restricted class of multiobjective linear fractional programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 352-355, August.
    14. Teghem, J. & Dufrane, D. & Thauvoye, M. & Kunsch, P., 1986. "Strange: An interactive method for multi-objective linear programming under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 65-82, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatima Bellahcene & Philippe Marthon, 2021. "A compromise solution method for the multiobjective minimum risk problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1913-1926, September.
    2. Lara, P. & Stancu-Minasian, I., 1999. "Fractional programming: a tool for the assessment of sustainability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 131-141, November.
    3. Metev, Boyan & Gueorguieva, Dessislava, 2000. "A simple method for obtaining weakly efficient points in multiobjective linear fractional programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 386-390, October.
    4. Gal, Tomas & Hanne, Thomas, 1999. "Consequences of dropping nonessential objectives for the application of MCDM methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 373-378, December.
    5. Fatima Bellahcene, 2019. "Decision maker's preferences modeling for multiple objective stochastic linear programming problems," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 29(3), pages 5-16.
    6. Tunjo Perić & Josip Matejaš & Zoran Babić, 2023. "Advantages, sensitivity and application efficiency of the new iterative method to solve multi-objective linear fractional programming problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(3), pages 751-767, September.
    7. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    8. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    9. Sumati Mahajan & S. K. Gupta, 2021. "On fully intuitionistic fuzzy multiobjective transportation problems using different membership functions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 211-241, January.
    10. Urli, Bruno & Nadeau, Raymond, 2004. "PROMISE/scenarios: An interactive method for multiobjective stochastic linear programming under partial uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 361-372, June.
    11. Torres-Rojo, J. M., 2001. "Risk management in the design of a feeding ration: a portfolio theory approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Glover, Fred & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 1-16, August.
    13. A. B. Malinowska & D. F. M. Torres, 2008. "Computational Approach to Essential and Nonessential Objective Functions in Linear Multicriteria Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 577-590, December.
    14. Nowak, Maciej, 2007. "Aspiration level approach in stochastic MCDM problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1626-1640, March.
    15. Gal, Tomas & Hanne, Thomas, 2006. "Nonessential objectives within network approaches for MCDM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 584-592, January.
    16. Navindran Davendralingam & Daniel. A. DeLaurentis, 2015. "A Robust Portfolio Optimization Approach to System of System Architectures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 269-283, May.
    17. P. Senthil Kumar, 2018. "Linear Programming Approach for Solving Balanced and Unbalanced Intuitionistic Fuzzy Transportation Problems," International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems (IJORIS), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 73-100, April.
    18. Andonegi, Aitor & Garmendia, Eneko & Aldezabal, Arantza, 2021. "Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    19. Tavana, Madjid & Ebrahimnejad, Ali & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. & Mansourzadeh, Seyed Mehdi & Matin, Reza Kazemi, 2018. "A hybrid DEA-MOLP model for public school assessment and closure decision in the City of Philadelphia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 70-89.
    20. Barbati, Maria & Greco, Salvatore & Lami, Isabella M., 2024. "The Deck-of-cards-based Ordinal Regression method and its application for the development of an ecovillage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 845-861.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:201:y:2010:i:2:p:390-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.