IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v29y2018ipcp415-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Handling a messy world: Lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational

Author

Listed:
  • Jax, Kurt
  • Furman, Eeva
  • Saarikoski, Heli
  • Barton, David N.
  • Delbaere, Ben
  • Dick, Jan
  • Duke, Guy
  • Görg, Christoph
  • Gómez-Baggethun, Erik
  • Harrison, Paula A.
  • Maes, Joachim
  • Pérez-Soba, Marta
  • Saarela, Sanna-Riikka
  • Turkelboom, Francis
  • van Dijk, Jiska
  • Watt, Allan D.

Abstract

The concept of ecosystem services is widely used in the scientific literature and increasingly also in policy and practice. Nevertheless, operationalising the concept, i.e. putting it into practice, is still a challenge. We describe the approach of the EU-project OpenNESS (Operationalisation of Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital), which was created in response to this challenge to critically evaluate the concept when applied to real world problems at different scales and in different policy sectors. General requirements for operationalization, the relevance of conceptual frameworks and lessons learnt from 27 case study applications are synthesized in a set of guiding principles. We also briefly describe some integrative tools as developed in OpenNESS which support the implementation of the principles. The guiding principles are grouped under three major headlines: “Defining the problem and opening up the problem space†, “Considering ethical issues†and “Assessing alternative methods, tools and actions†. Real world problems are often “wicked†problems, which at first are seldom clear-cut and well-defined, but often rather complex and subject to differing interpretations and interests. We take account of that complexity and emphasise that there is not one simple and straightforward way to approach real world problems involving ecosystem services. The principles and tools presented are meant to provide some guidance for tackling this complexity by means of a transdisciplinary methodology that facilitates the operationalisation of the ecosystem services concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Jax, Kurt & Furman, Eeva & Saarikoski, Heli & Barton, David N. & Delbaere, Ben & Dick, Jan & Duke, Guy & Görg, Christoph & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & Harrison, Paula A. & Maes, Joachim & Pérez-Soba, M, 2018. "Handling a messy world: Lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PC), pages 415-427.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:415-427
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617300177
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:542-551 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:eee:ecoser:v:14:y:2015:i:c:p:144-157 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:515-528 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Reyes-García, Victoria & Menendez-Baceta, Gorka & Aceituno-Mata, Laura & Acosta-Naranjo, Rufino & Calvet-Mir, Laura & Domínguez, Pablo & Garnatje, Teresa & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & Molina-Bustamante, M, 2015. "From famine foods to delicatessen: Interpreting trends in the use of wild edible plants through cultural ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 303-311.
    5. Rode, Julian & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & Krause, Torsten, 2015. "Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 270-282.
    6. Davidson, Marc D., 2013. "On the relation between ecosystem services, intrinsic value, existence value and economic valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 171-177.
    7. repec:eee:ecoser:v:12:y:2015:i:c:p:117-127 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:599-607 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:eee:ecoser:v:16:y:2015:i:c:p:158-166 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:579-598 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Norton, Bryan G. & Noonan, Douglas, 2007. "Ecology and valuation: Big changes needed," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 664-675, September.
    12. repec:eee:ecoser:v:22:y:2016:i:pb:p:213-220 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Jax, Kurt & Barton, David N. & Chan, Kai M.A. & de Groot, Rudolf & Doyle, Ulrike & Eser, Uta & Görg, Christoph & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & Griewald, Yuliana & Haber, Wolfgang & Haines-Young, Roy & Heink, 2013. "Ecosystem services and ethics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 260-268.
    14. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:566-578 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & Barton, David N., 2013. "Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 235-245.
    16. Salomaa, Anna & Paloniemi, Riikka & Hujala, Teppo & Rantala, Salla & Arponen, Anni & Niemelä, Jari, 2016. "The use of knowledge in evidence-informed voluntary conservation of Finnish forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 90-98.
    17. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:452-464 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Abson, D.J. & von Wehrden, H. & Baumgärtner, S. & Fischer, J. & Hanspach, J. & Härdtle, W. & Heinrichs, H. & Klein, A.M. & Lang, D.J. & Martens, P. & Walmsley, D., 2014. "Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 29-37.
    19. Funtowicz, Silvio O. & Ravetz, Jerome R., 1994. "The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 197-207, August.
    20. repec:eee:ecoser:v:16:y:2015:i:c:p:201-211 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:481-498 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:552-565 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Ulrich Heink & Elisabeth Marquard & Katja Heubach & Kurt Jax & Carolin Kugel & Carsten Neßhöver & Rosmarie K. Neumann & Axel Paulsch & Sebastian Tilch & Johannes Timaeus & Marie Vandewalle, 2015. "Conceptualizing credibility, relevance and legitimacy for evaluating the effectiveness of science–policy interfaces: Challenges and opportunities," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(5), pages 676-689.
    24. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:428-440 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. repec:eee:ecoser:v:16:y:2015:i:c:p:174-181 is not listed on IDEAS
    26. repec:eee:ecoser:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:85-92 is not listed on IDEAS
    27. Ruckelshaus, Mary & McKenzie, Emily & Tallis, Heather & Guerry, Anne & Daily, Gretchen & Kareiva, Peter & Polasky, Stephen & Ricketts, Taylor & Bhagabati, Nirmal & Wood, Spencer A. & Bernhardt, Joanna, 2015. "Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 11-21.
    28. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:499-514 is not listed on IDEAS
    29. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:441-451 is not listed on IDEAS
    30. repec:eee:ecoser:v:26:y:2017:i:pb:p:306-315 is not listed on IDEAS
    31. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:465-480 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:552-565 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:481-498 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:599-607 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:eee:ecoser:v:31:y:2018:i:pa:p:93-101 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:566-578 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:579-598 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:eee:ecoser:v:35:y:2019:i:c:p:280-293 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:415-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.