IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/econom/v147y2008i2p225-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chamberlin's strategy of multiple working hypotheses and a relative frequency theory of market demand

Author

Listed:
  • Basmann, R.L.

Abstract

The neoclassical theory of demand based on fixed indifference map hypotheses has not yet become significantly assertible in the sense of modern logic. That is because of the great difficulty encountered in empirical confirmation of its presuppositions and antecedent hypotheses, which is essential to its significant assertibility. Full confirmation of antecedent conditions is impossible with market equilibrium data alone. That puts a considerable premium on approaching any investigation in econometric demand analysis with several mutually testable hypotheses that are already well-explored and thought through. Preparation is necessary to recognize when otherwise interesting mutually testable economic hypotheses cannot be tested because the nature of the data required has not yet been adequately discerned. ...it becomes clear that hypotheses always remain hypotheses, that is, suppositions to the complete certainty of which we can never attain. [Kant, Immanuel, 1988. Logic. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY, Translation of Kant's Logik: Ein Handbuch zu Vorlesungen (1800), by Robert S. Hartman and Wolfgang Schwarz]. The effort is to bring up into view every rational explanation of new phenomena, and to develop every tenable hypothesis respecting their cause and history. [Chamberlin, T.C., 1890. The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science (Old series) 15. Reprinted in 1965 in Science 148, 754-759].

Suggested Citation

  • Basmann, R.L., 2008. "Chamberlin's strategy of multiple working hypotheses and a relative frequency theory of market demand," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 225-231, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:econom:v:147:y:2008:i:2:p:225-231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304-4076(08)00138-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basmann, R. L., 1988. "Causality tests and observationally equivalent representations of econometric models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1-2), pages 69-104.
    2. Wulwick, Nancy J., 1992. "The Folklore of H. L. Moore on the Demand for Pig Iron," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 168-188, October.
    3. R.L. Basmann & R.C. Battalio & J.H. Kagel, 1976. "An Experimental Test of a Simple Theory of Aggregate Per-capita Demand Functions," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 112(II), pages 153-173, June.
    4. Basmann, R L & Molina, D J & Slottje, D J, 1983. "Budget Constraint Prices as Preference Changing Parameters of Generalized Fechner-Thurstone Direct Utility Functions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(3), pages 411-413, June.
    5. Slottje, D J, 1987. "Relative Price Changes and Inequality in the Size Distribution of Various Components of Income: A Multidemensional Approach," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 5(1), pages 19-26, January.
    6. Wagner, Alfred, 1891. "Marshall's Principles of Economics," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 5, pages 319-338.
    7. L. R. Klein & H. Rubin, 1947. "A Constant-Utility Index of the Cost of Living," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 15(2), pages 84-87.
    8. E. J. Working, 1927. "What Do Statistical "Demand Curves" Show?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 41(2), pages 212-235.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arthur Lewbel, 2019. "The Identification Zoo: Meanings of Identification in Econometrics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 57(4), pages 835-903, December.
    2. David F. Hendry, 2020. "A Short History of Macro-econometric Modelling," Economics Papers 2020-W01, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    3. Yariv, Leeat & Jackson, Matthew O., 2018. "The Non-Existence of Representative Agents," CEPR Discussion Papers 13397, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. SAITO Yukiko, 2013. "Role of Hub Firms in Geographical Transaction Network," Discussion papers 13080, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    5. P.A.V.B. Swamy & I-Lok Chang & Jatinder S. Mehta & William H. Greene & Stephen G. Hall & George S. Tavlas, 2016. "Removing Specification Errors from the Usual Formulation of Binary Choice Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.
    7. Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci & Stefano Usai, 2013. "Productivity Growth In The Old And New Europe: The Role Of Agglomeration Externalities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 418-442, August.
    8. Kristien Werck & Bruno Heyndels & Benny Geys, 2008. "The impact of ‘central places’ on spatial spending patterns: evidence from Flemish local government cultural expenditures," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(1), pages 35-58, March.
    9. Giulia Faggio & Olmo Silva & William C Strange, 2020. "Tales of the city: what do agglomeration cases tell us about agglomeration in general? [The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation ," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 1117-1143.
    10. Paola Tubaro, 2009. "Is individual rationality essential to market price formation? The contribution of zero-intelligence agent trading models," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19.
    11. H. W. Arndt, 1984. "Political Economy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 60(3), pages 266-273, September.
    12. Roberto Ganau & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2022. "Does urban concentration matter for changes in country economic performance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1275-1299, May.
    13. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire & Antoine Ly, 2017. "Econom\'etrie et Machine Learning," Papers 1708.06992, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    14. Amy Glasmeier, 2007. "Book Reviews," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 867-870.
    15. Han, Feng & Ke, Shanzi, 2016. "The effects of factor proximity and market potential on urban manufacturing output," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 31-45.
    16. Duranton, Gilles & Puga, Diego, 2014. "The Growth of Cities," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 5, pages 781-853, Elsevier.
    17. Otsuka, Akihiro, 2023. "Industrial electricity consumption efficiency and energy policy in Japan," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Martin, Philippe & Mayer, Thierry & Mayneris, Florian, 2011. "Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 182-195, March.
    19. Yener Altunbaş & Edward Jones & John Thornton, 2013. "Knowledge spillovers and the growth of British cities," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 162-166, February.
    20. Markus Bugge, 2011. "Creative Distraction: Lack of Collective Learning in Adapting to Online Advertising in Oslo, Norway," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 227-248.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:econom:v:147:y:2008:i:2:p:225-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jeconom .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.